TalesFromTheSlums
I'm better.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2025
- Posts
- 556
- Reputation
- 989
Many here are WAY too sure in what they think a vague rating means from girls.
In reality girls rate not on some "objective" scale, i.e., when a girl sees a guy & gives him a rating AT THAT VERY TIME this is not a fuck note. This does not mean this guy is "her type" even.
The simple truth is a girl, like anyone, will rate a picture/video of someone BASED ON HOW THEY FEEL AT THAT VERY MOMENT. There is no "blackpill compass" built in to women -- only dwellers think that shit. They don't ONLY rate based on horniness/lustfulness/fuck appeal.
Women will rate a man based on VARIOUS factors as well, all of which are not pure sex appeal.
For example, someone shows you a semi-cute girl. You rate her 6 or 7. Does this mean you will lustfully chase her down and try to fuck her? Does this mean you will even GIVE A SHIT if you saw her IRL? She can rate a dude in a pic 10/10 & never try talking to him & even reject him IRL. Why somehow do you tards not realize this & think vague ratings are so useful?!
Girls see and are asked and EVEN FOR FUN will rate dudes, girls, even your sister's cat pics (the kind with four legs retard). What does this all mean? Basically, NOTHING. People rate based on VARIED circumstances at the time -- how they feel, how good the particular picture shown is appearing to them, what type of exact particular features they like, how horny they are, their upbringing/preferences, what the guy in the pic wearing, HOW GOOD THE PIC IS (frauded), etc.
Bottom line is girls rate a picture not based on fuck appeal alone as many here think they do.
They DO NOT. Girls will rate a dude an 8/10 easily, then NEVER, EVER give an IOI to said guy if they see him IRL. They may think, "Oh shit, is that guy look familiar?" And then go about their day. Just because they saw "8/10" in a pic DOESN'T MEAN THEY WANNA FUCK HIM.
JFL many here think women make a 'Chad wank bank' of every 7/10+ guy they see. No, they will see him, move on, forget him, and they will never see him IRL. Even if they did, they may still not try to fuck him. They may then go & try to fuck a 5/10 because he's "her type."
On the flipside, she may see a realistically obtainable dude somewhere in her social proximity with decent enough looks (who may not be ANYWHERE near what you autists call a 7/10 or PSL 5+ even) and approach him, or give him an IOI. The SAME GIRL WHO CALLS SOME RANDO GUY A 7/10 ON A PICTURE OR EVEN AN 8/10 MAY VERY WELL IGNORE THE SAME GUY IRL AND PURSUE/GIVE IOIs TO A DUDE SEVERAL POINTS LOWER. YES, THIS DOES HAPPEN.
The difference is in the IDEALITY vs. REALITY. In a pic she's rating for fuck all purpose -- just on a pic. She can see a nice looking dude in a pic, yes. MUCH nicer looking than you. That DOES NOT MEAN she wants to instantly fuck him. DOES NOT MEAN she will even make AN EFFORT WHATSOEVER to deliberately try to get his attention. Meanwhile, some "appeal" dude LOWER THAN HIM ON A LOOKS SCALE will get pussy because SHE WILL ACTUALLY APPROACH HIM rather than just RATE HIM IN A PIC. You have to realize the DYNAMICS at play here.
I don't know why this is so complicated for most of you autists on here. MANY girls rate random "cute guys" high -- the same guys they will NEVER try and fuck. Meanwhile, often times the lot of dudes they try and fuck ARE NOT some 10/10 guys ALMOST NEVER. It's always a guy somewhat ABOVE HER LEAGUE USUALLY but almost NEVER will it be those "perfect" dudes they give high ratings to in photos -- those of which the SPECIFIC MEANING BEHIND NUMERICAL RATING RANDOMLY OVER A PIC ESSENTIALLY SUMMARIZE TO NOTHING AS MANY TIMES THEY WILL NOT MAKE ANY EFFORT TO REALLY BE WITH THESE GUYS IN REAL LIFE. Rating a pic & choosing who you fuck ARE NOT 1:1! Their ratings DO NOT ALWAYS MEAN WHAT YOU THINK.
So bottom line to TL;DR -- girls can rate guys SUPER HIGH and make no interest in fucking them. Girls also can try and fuck guys who'd NEVER photograph as appealing as the other guys they may rate higher YET NOT TRY AND BE WITH IF THEY SEE IRL. Girls don't have a "fixed fuck threshold" -- that of which any dude they give "higher than 'X'" number/point they will ABSOLUTELY fuck him; and those of which are under they absolutely will never. This is NOT how they work in most cases. There is no numerical "fine line" that's always objective/never subjected to how they feel at the time or other circumstances. There's no exact "fuck zone."
It's not because you're necessarily a "sub 8" that no girl will fuck you (because as stated girls will wildly rate dudes across the board in an almost MEANINGLESS threshold of variances/purposes/intents) -- it's just because you're not good enough for ANY at the time and presence around them. This has to do with looks, but it's NOT DOWN TO ANY FIXED, OBJECTIVE NUMBER WHICH ALWAYS SPECIFICALLY AMOUNTS TO A SEXUAL PURSUING OUTCOME. NO. Once you realize this then you'll realize "what a girl rates a dude" is essentially fucking meaningless for how US GUYS HERE use per judgement of definitive sexual appeal or the choices a girl will make when rating a guy (which are often NONE as in most cases the situations don't call for it, or the rating cannot be stabilized to have any objective meaning). They rate DYNAMICALLY/VARIABLY too, not like actual robots you virgins.
In reality girls rate not on some "objective" scale, i.e., when a girl sees a guy & gives him a rating AT THAT VERY TIME this is not a fuck note. This does not mean this guy is "her type" even.
The simple truth is a girl, like anyone, will rate a picture/video of someone BASED ON HOW THEY FEEL AT THAT VERY MOMENT. There is no "blackpill compass" built in to women -- only dwellers think that shit. They don't ONLY rate based on horniness/lustfulness/fuck appeal.
Women will rate a man based on VARIOUS factors as well, all of which are not pure sex appeal.
For example, someone shows you a semi-cute girl. You rate her 6 or 7. Does this mean you will lustfully chase her down and try to fuck her? Does this mean you will even GIVE A SHIT if you saw her IRL? She can rate a dude in a pic 10/10 & never try talking to him & even reject him IRL. Why somehow do you tards not realize this & think vague ratings are so useful?!
Girls see and are asked and EVEN FOR FUN will rate dudes, girls, even your sister's cat pics (the kind with four legs retard). What does this all mean? Basically, NOTHING. People rate based on VARIED circumstances at the time -- how they feel, how good the particular picture shown is appearing to them, what type of exact particular features they like, how horny they are, their upbringing/preferences, what the guy in the pic wearing, HOW GOOD THE PIC IS (frauded), etc.
Bottom line is girls rate a picture not based on fuck appeal alone as many here think they do.
They DO NOT. Girls will rate a dude an 8/10 easily, then NEVER, EVER give an IOI to said guy if they see him IRL. They may think, "Oh shit, is that guy look familiar?" And then go about their day. Just because they saw "8/10" in a pic DOESN'T MEAN THEY WANNA FUCK HIM.
JFL many here think women make a 'Chad wank bank' of every 7/10+ guy they see. No, they will see him, move on, forget him, and they will never see him IRL. Even if they did, they may still not try to fuck him. They may then go & try to fuck a 5/10 because he's "her type."
On the flipside, she may see a realistically obtainable dude somewhere in her social proximity with decent enough looks (who may not be ANYWHERE near what you autists call a 7/10 or PSL 5+ even) and approach him, or give him an IOI. The SAME GIRL WHO CALLS SOME RANDO GUY A 7/10 ON A PICTURE OR EVEN AN 8/10 MAY VERY WELL IGNORE THE SAME GUY IRL AND PURSUE/GIVE IOIs TO A DUDE SEVERAL POINTS LOWER. YES, THIS DOES HAPPEN.
The difference is in the IDEALITY vs. REALITY. In a pic she's rating for fuck all purpose -- just on a pic. She can see a nice looking dude in a pic, yes. MUCH nicer looking than you. That DOES NOT MEAN she wants to instantly fuck him. DOES NOT MEAN she will even make AN EFFORT WHATSOEVER to deliberately try to get his attention. Meanwhile, some "appeal" dude LOWER THAN HIM ON A LOOKS SCALE will get pussy because SHE WILL ACTUALLY APPROACH HIM rather than just RATE HIM IN A PIC. You have to realize the DYNAMICS at play here.
I don't know why this is so complicated for most of you autists on here. MANY girls rate random "cute guys" high -- the same guys they will NEVER try and fuck. Meanwhile, often times the lot of dudes they try and fuck ARE NOT some 10/10 guys ALMOST NEVER. It's always a guy somewhat ABOVE HER LEAGUE USUALLY but almost NEVER will it be those "perfect" dudes they give high ratings to in photos -- those of which the SPECIFIC MEANING BEHIND NUMERICAL RATING RANDOMLY OVER A PIC ESSENTIALLY SUMMARIZE TO NOTHING AS MANY TIMES THEY WILL NOT MAKE ANY EFFORT TO REALLY BE WITH THESE GUYS IN REAL LIFE. Rating a pic & choosing who you fuck ARE NOT 1:1! Their ratings DO NOT ALWAYS MEAN WHAT YOU THINK.
So bottom line to TL;DR -- girls can rate guys SUPER HIGH and make no interest in fucking them. Girls also can try and fuck guys who'd NEVER photograph as appealing as the other guys they may rate higher YET NOT TRY AND BE WITH IF THEY SEE IRL. Girls don't have a "fixed fuck threshold" -- that of which any dude they give "higher than 'X'" number/point they will ABSOLUTELY fuck him; and those of which are under they absolutely will never. This is NOT how they work in most cases. There is no numerical "fine line" that's always objective/never subjected to how they feel at the time or other circumstances. There's no exact "fuck zone."
It's not because you're necessarily a "sub 8" that no girl will fuck you (because as stated girls will wildly rate dudes across the board in an almost MEANINGLESS threshold of variances/purposes/intents) -- it's just because you're not good enough for ANY at the time and presence around them. This has to do with looks, but it's NOT DOWN TO ANY FIXED, OBJECTIVE NUMBER WHICH ALWAYS SPECIFICALLY AMOUNTS TO A SEXUAL PURSUING OUTCOME. NO. Once you realize this then you'll realize "what a girl rates a dude" is essentially fucking meaningless for how US GUYS HERE use per judgement of definitive sexual appeal or the choices a girl will make when rating a guy (which are often NONE as in most cases the situations don't call for it, or the rating cannot be stabilized to have any objective meaning). They rate DYNAMICALLY/VARIABLY too, not like actual robots you virgins.
Last edited:
