Wide zygos=weak undereye support?

toptearmm

toptearmm

JB pussy slayer
Joined
Jul 18, 2019
Posts
781
Reputation
624
Screenshot 20200305 153010 Chrome

Ive seen that alot, peaple with wide zygos lack good undereye support or amI wrong?
Because I have wide zygos but my undereye support is weak.
 
  • +1
Reactions: rydofx
this guy has both good under eye support and wide zygos
I wouldnt consider this good under eye support.

This is what I would consider good under eye support
30256 908 2011912170397


No eyebags or eveb dark under eyes
 
you could find a bad pic of any male model and say this about them
 
  • +1
Reactions: je3oe and buflek
Not necessarily, I mean, Barrett has wide zygos and good undereye support, a lot of other people do.
 
D30C00A3 7025 469E 98DF 005581597365
 
  • +1
Reactions: sloopnoob and Vidyacoper
I have wide zygos and poor umdereye support.
 
lateral growth and frontal growth are different. poor eye support=bad forward growth
 
  • +1
Reactions: Vidyacoper
i have the same issue
 
I have the same thing but I doubt there’s correlation
 
I wouldnt consider this good under eye support.

This is what I would consider good under eye supportView attachment 295528

No eyebags or eveb dark under eyes
it still gets much better than that, this is actually good undereye support:
42649949121 3c28299450 b
Person images MAXHENHAPPEL 5ad9a2f0442e2800168afc71


also my avi but its quite hard to find good pictures of him:
Michael and matthew resized
920x920
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hades, rydofx and Deleted member 2227
no
 
  • +1
Reactions: Effortless
ABSOLUTELY FUCKTARD BRAINLET NONEXISTENT IQ GREYCEL TIER THREAD, I LOST HALF MY BRAIN FUNCTIONALITY READING THIS SHIT, HELP HUMANITY STARTING WITH THIS AROUND YOUR NECK

IMG 20200124 171045 317
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: rydofx and Deleted member 5204
lateral growth and frontal growth are different. poor eye support=bad forward growth

Does this mean forward growth is not everything? Taylor Hill has bad under eye support and still gorgeous
 
Does this mean forward growth is not everything? Taylor Hill has bad under eye support and still gorgeous
I'm not good at telling if someone has good forward growth, but I'd like to think she has good forward growth and yet somehow she doesn't have good eye support. Maybe you could measure her forward growth. She's gl yes, her ipd is ideal, nice cheekbones, compact mid face, really good nose so not really sure if she's recessed.
 
This guy looks like a boner
 

Attachments

  • D95205E4-1470-4734-A354-E92C04138E3A.jpeg
    D95205E4-1470-4734-A354-E92C04138E3A.jpeg
    21.1 KB · Views: 48
Be af
this gook's recessed and yet has good enough eye support, could be a number of thing
 
I'm not good at telling if someone has good forward growth, but I'd like to think she has good forward growth and yet somehow she doesn't have good eye support. Maybe you could measure her forward growth. She's gl yes, her ipd is ideal, nice cheekbones, compact mid face, really good nose so not really sure if she's recessed.

So now the question is that foward growth doesn't always = good under eye support?
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Effortless

Similar threads

PolishLooksMaxxer
Replies
2
Views
109
Madridista
Madridista
zxim
Replies
3
Views
147
ADOLESCENTCEL
ADOLESCENTCEL
stress
Replies
2
Views
171
97baHater
97baHater
D
Replies
31
Views
1K
PatrickBasedman
P

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top