Wikipedia on looks

.👽.

.👽.

everyone can get a GF except me💔
Joined
Jan 17, 2020
Posts
19,743
Reputation
33,776
"Women, regardless of sexual orientation, tend to be less interested in a partner’s physical attractiveness than men"

Looks arent everything ma boys. Dont rope if you look normal.

If you are a women and ugly, insta rope. For men lools are everything.

Opinions?
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: BeestungLipsTheory and Deleted member 616
Anyone can edit wikipedia.
nuf said jfl
WhatsApp Image 2019 12 27 at 82951 PM


avg article editor tbhql
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4577, Chadelite, Deleted member 616 and 7 others
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA ITS ALL SBOUT YOUR PERSONALITY BROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO :feelswhy: :feelswhy: :feelswhy: :feelswhy::feelswhy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 4209
True for LTRs, but the exact opposite for hookups.
 
You nigga now that wikipedia uses legit sources like scientific papers?
no. tbh idgaf i'm low iq. can shove their papers up their scientific ass if they put bluepill shit like that on the front page
 
"When participants learned that a person had positive personality characteristics (e.g., smart, funny, kind), that person was seen as more physically attractive.[294] Conversely, a person with negative personality characteristics (e.g., materialistic, rude, untrustworthy) was seen as less physically attractive".

What you niggas say about this. Real life experiment in 2007
no. tbh idgaf i'm low iq. can shove their papers up their scientific ass if they put bluepill shit like that on the front page
😂 you are like a climate change denier. Scientists are wrong but a nigga without an degree knows everything
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 4577
It's totally true. Everyone knows Wikipedia knows all. Especially about dating and looks
 
It's totally true. Everyone knows Wikipedia knows all. Especially about dating and looks
They cite legit sources. Swallow this pill son
 
They cite legit sources. Swallow this pill son
Remember this is just about women(gettimg a LTR).
Good looks still gives you better life, jobs etc. If you want 100 ONS you need the looks. All written in the article
 
When you're ugly your personality won't make you attractive just less ugly
 
When you're ugly your personality won't make you attractive just less ugly
Yea but i said this if for normal looking people only.
And yes, personality gives you a boost or can downgrade you. If you are a 10/10 chad with a bad personality can make you an 8/10 ( for example)
 
Yea but i said this if for normal looking people only.
And yes, personality gives you a boost or can downgrade you. If you are a 10/10 chad a bad personality can make you an 8/10 ( for example)
:feelsree::feelsree::feelsree:
 
  • JFL
Reactions: I'mme
They go still for look first.
 
Shekel backed thread tbh
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Fear
They cite legit sources. Swallow this pill son
You can literally go out with a good looking friend irl if your ugly or go online as a good looking to catfish then use a ugly guys and see the difference in how they respond to you.

Wikipedia isn’t allowed when writing papers or scientific work for a reason
 
You can literally go out with a good looking friend irl if your ugly or go online as a good looking to catfish then use a ugly guys and see the difference. Wikipedia isn’t allowed when writing papers or scientific work for a reason
Nigga read the thread before commenting. This is for normal guys. If you are an 2/10 a good personality can make you a 4/10. Still ugly
 
Nigga read the thread before commenting. This is for normal guys. If you are an 2/10 a good personality can make you a 4/10. Still ugly

I’m one of the few who preach nt theory on here don’t come at me like that bruh

I’m just saying whoever wrote that article is retarded.

and use your brain you won’t be able to show your personality if a girl sees you in the first few seconds at a party or on the street and her brain judges you or online when you message a Girl then she sees your 2/10 face and ghosts you. Jfl
 
Wikipedia isn’t allowed when writing papers or scientific work for a reason
Wikipedia directly isnt allowed, yes, but tje resources from which wikipedia cites are allowed. Those are mostly scientific papers and you cant say shit against them
 
  • +1
Reactions: vHenri
Wikipedia directly isnt allowed, yes, but tje resources from which wikipedia cites are allowed. Those are mostly scientific papers and you cant say shit against them
What about the scientific papers which directly argue against those papers?

we can have this argument if you want bro your choice
 
I’m one of the few who preach nt theory on here don’t come at me like that bruh

I’m just saying whoever wrote that article is retarded.

and use your brain you won’t be able to show your personality if a girl sees you in the first few seconds at a party or on the street and her brain judges you or online when you message a Girl then she sees your 2/10 face and ghosts you. Jfl
Fak off man. Read thread before commenting
What about the scientific papers which directly argue against those papers?

we can have this argument if you want bro your choice
Show me bro
 
Compared to men, women are indeed less interested in attractiveness relative to their other criteria, but the cost of reproduction is so much higher for them to that are much more choosier than men overall, looks included. Like, a large slice of a very large pie is bigger than a very large slice of a small pie.
 
  • +1
Reactions: hebbewem
Lol this funny af

Literally just google it

hypergamy, are looks important in dating, how people in better looking are treated in society or the halo effect
Thats why i said read comments, because i alread wrote that. GL ppl are treated better etc, getting more ONS. But for a LTR is not THAT important, your personality can boost you
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Ogmanman
"Women, regardless of sexual orientation, tend to be less interested in a partner’s physical attractiveness than men"

Opinions?
Wrong statement.
I recall reading this study. That tracked for both men and women: what they said they found important (most studies stop there) AND what their behaviour was.

Conclusion of the study/research:
women understate how important they find looks in a mal, there was a bof gap/discrapency there. And, women found looks only slightly (almost error margin) less important then men find it.
And we all know how important men find looks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Ogmanman, Deleted member 4054 and hebbewem
PSL worldview relies on many cherry-picked things, nothing new
 

Similar threads

pandamonium
Replies
9
Views
311
actualunderstander
actualunderstander
M
Replies
16
Views
725
castizo_ascender
castizo_ascender
IntelligentCel
Replies
5
Views
327
merpXD
merpXD

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top