G
gai_saber
Iron
- Joined
- May 26, 2020
- Posts
- 202
- Reputation
- 250
In social situations, people will prima facie perceive a taller person as more dominant; however, is it possible that through wit with a tinge of arrogance that a noticeably shorter person could claim dominance over this taller person?
Let us imagine this scenario, and let us make it extreme: we have A who is 6'6 and B who is 5'5 but is, by a good degree, more socially intelligent than A. These two are together and presenting something -- say a school project or something.
Now again, A is likely to be perceived as more dominant by virtue of height. But after the presentation has been rolling for some time, it becomes clear to most that B is more socially intelligent, and in fact, B has been subtly been mocking A in a funny way, to which A is mostly oblivious, making the observers laugh. Could this display of intellectual dominance elevate B to a level roughly equal to, or even above A?
Another possible reaction I envision is that observers could reckon B a bully, or insecure, "short man syndrome", etc.
Let us imagine this scenario, and let us make it extreme: we have A who is 6'6 and B who is 5'5 but is, by a good degree, more socially intelligent than A. These two are together and presenting something -- say a school project or something.
Now again, A is likely to be perceived as more dominant by virtue of height. But after the presentation has been rolling for some time, it becomes clear to most that B is more socially intelligent, and in fact, B has been subtly been mocking A in a funny way, to which A is mostly oblivious, making the observers laugh. Could this display of intellectual dominance elevate B to a level roughly equal to, or even above A?
Another possible reaction I envision is that observers could reckon B a bully, or insecure, "short man syndrome", etc.