woman’s are responsible for picking bad man. Prove me wrong [PURE INCEL RAGE]

iblamealek

iblamealek

Samson’s descendant
Joined
Sep 23, 2024
Posts
576
Reputation
658
For most people, physical attraction is a prerequisite, with personality serving as an enhancer. For example, a guy with a great personality who isn't physically attractive enough will often get friend-zoned, while a good-looking guy with a terrible personality can still secure at least
some kind of non-platonic relationship with women. Even if that relationship doesn't last long because of his personality, he's still able to get into a relationship with women in at least some way. The bad-looking guy with a great personality is never able to get into even a short-term relationship with women, because they aren't attracted to him in the first place.
This is relevant because most women are physically attractive enough to most men.
That means the baseline filter that men face, whether a woman is attracted to them at all, is much less strict for women. If a woman finds a man's personality appealing, she can usually act on that because odds are that the man already finds her physically attractive. This creates a big asymmetry. Women can select the guy with the personality they desire, and since their physical attractiveness already guarantees them options, they have the freedom to prioritize whichever personality traits they like best.
Men don't have that freedom. Most women are not attracted to most men, which severely limits the pool available to them. A guy can't simply pick a woman with the personality he likes best, because if she isn't into him physically, her personality doesn't matter, she's never an option
It's not that personality doesn't matter to men; it's that the women whose personalities they'd actually like often don't find them attractive in the first place.
Women often complain about men "objectifying" them or not appreciating their personalities, but their situation is the opposite, since almost any guy they're into personality-wise will already be attracted to them; they can prioritize compatibility and filter out men who just want them for looks. They can afford to be pickier about personality because their pool is so wide. The only time women end up feeling like there are "no good guys" is when they themselves narrow their definition of "physically attractive enough" so much that they shrink their own pool. In other words, if they can't find compatible men, it's usually because they've excluded too many options, not because men are inherently unwilling to care about their personalities.



IDC IF YOU RESPOND DNR JUST PUT A THUMB UP CUZ THIS IS FR Y’ALL LIVES :lul::bigbrain:

HIG IQ THREAD :feelsuhh::feelswhy::feelshah::blackpill:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Chadeep, kisuke, 59H390 and 4 others
For most people, physical attraction is a prerequisite, with personality serving as an enhancer. For example, a guy with a great personality who isn't physically attractive enough will often get friend-zoned, while a good-looking guy with a terrible personality can still secure at least
some kind of non-platonic relationship with women. Even if that relationship doesn't last long because of his personality, he's still able to get into a relationship with women in at least some way. The bad-looking guy with a great personality is never able to get into even a short-term relationship with women, because they aren't attracted to him in the first place.
This is relevant because most women are physically attractive enough to most men.
That means the baseline filter that men face, whether a woman is attracted to them at all, is much less strict for women. If a woman finds a man's personality appealing, she can usually act on that because odds are that the man already finds her physically attractive. This creates a big asymmetry. Women can select the guy with the personality they desire, and since their physical attractiveness already guarantees them options, they have the freedom to prioritize whichever personality traits they like best.
Men don't have that freedom. Most women are not attracted to most men, which severely limits the pool available to them. A guy can't simply pick a woman with the personality he likes best, because if she isn't into him physically, her personality doesn't matter, she's never an option
It's not that personality doesn't matter to men; it's that the women whose personalities they'd actually like often don't find them attractive in the first place.
Women often complain about men "objectifying" them or not appreciating their personalities, but their situation is the opposite, since almost any guy they're into personality-wise will already be attracted to them; they can prioritize compatibility and filter out men who just want them for looks. They can afford to be pickier about personality because their pool is so wide. The only time women end up feeling like there are "no good guys" is when they themselves narrow their definition of "physically attractive enough" so much that they shrink their own pool. In other words, if they can't find compatible men, it's usually because they've excluded too many options, not because men are inherently unwilling to care about their personalities.



IDC IF YOU RESPOND DNR JUST PUT A THUMB UP CUZ THIS IS FR Y’ALL LIVES :lul::bigbrain:

HIG IQ THREAD :feelsuhh::feelswhy::feelshah::blackpill:
water thread
 
personality detector when it comes to sniffing out a poster on an obscure internet forum vs. personality detector when it comes to identifying a rapist, serial killer, gang member
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: eyewideshut and iblamealek
cmon make a tldr:feelsrope:
 
  • +1
Reactions: 59H390
You didnt have to put the incel rage part its just facts not any rage rant
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamealek
For most people, physical attraction is a prerequisite, with personality serving as an enhancer. For example, a guy with a great personality who isn't physically attractive enough will often get friend-zoned, while a good-looking guy with a terrible personality can still secure at least
some kind of non-platonic relationship with women. Even if that relationship doesn't last long because of his personality, he's still able to get into a relationship with women in at least some way. The bad-looking guy with a great personality is never able to get into even a short-term relationship with women, because they aren't attracted to him in the first place.
This is relevant because most women are physically attractive enough to most men.
That means the baseline filter that men face, whether a woman is attracted to them at all, is much less strict for women. If a woman finds a man's personality appealing, she can usually act on that because odds are that the man already finds her physically attractive. This creates a big asymmetry. Women can select the guy with the personality they desire, and since their physical attractiveness already guarantees them options, they have the freedom to prioritize whichever personality traits they like best.
Men don't have that freedom. Most women are not attracted to most men, which severely limits the pool available to them. A guy can't simply pick a woman with the personality he likes best, because if she isn't into him physically, her personality doesn't matter, she's never an option
It's not that personality doesn't matter to men; it's that the women whose personalities they'd actually like often don't find them attractive in the first place.
Women often complain about men "objectifying" them or not appreciating their personalities, but their situation is the opposite, since almost any guy they're into personality-wise will already be attracted to them; they can prioritize compatibility and filter out men who just want them for looks. They can afford to be pickier about personality because their pool is so wide. The only time women end up feeling like there are "no good guys" is when they themselves narrow their definition of "physically attractive enough" so much that they shrink their own pool. In other words, if they can't find compatible men, it's usually because they've excluded too many options, not because men are inherently unwilling to care about their personalities.



IDC IF YOU RESPOND DNR JUST PUT A THUMB UP CUZ THIS IS FR Y’ALL LIVES :lul::bigbrain:

HIG IQ THREAD :feelsuhh::feelswhy::feelshah::blackpill:
water but explained well , physical attraction will always triumph because it's the only factor of attraction that genuinely sends a message to a woman's body , no amount of personality can defeat that so this issue is unsolvable
 
  • +1
Reactions: iblamealek
A summary of a terrible personality usually comes with Machiavellianism, an idea of a terrible personality is a defined 'label' that you see fit in YOUR head. A personality a girl finds attractive can differ if you are thinking about it logically. I know MTN's that have a 'shit personality' but they have traits you only notice if you are with them 24/7, like confidence, dominance, or social pull. They make it work behind the scenes. Ofc a good looking guy with a genuinely shit personality will find themselves with women but it's the fact that you don't date to dump, (unless you are slaying.) You date to possibly commit for the rest of your life. Are those guy's winning in that aspect? no.

But your story just further proves points of blackpill we know. No shit a good looking dude is going to do better then some genuine, grounded, ugly guy.
 

Similar threads

got.daim
Replies
35
Views
527
ijustwannaascendlol
ijustwannaascendlol
_MVP_
Replies
3
Views
28
whiteegyptian
whiteegyptian
BWC_virgin
Replies
28
Views
917
Primalsplit
Primalsplit
ScienceCel
Replies
16
Views
283
ScienceCel
ScienceCel

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top