woman’s are responsible for picking bad man. Prove me wrong [PURE INCEL RAGE]

[iblamealek]

For most people, physical attraction is a prerequisite, with personality serving as an enhancer. For example, a guy with a great personality who isn't physically attractive enough will often get friend-zoned, while a good-looking guy with a terrible personality can still secure at least
some kind of non-platonic relationship with women. Even if that relationship doesn't last long because of his personality, he's still able to get into a relationship with women in at least some way. The bad-looking guy with a great personality is never able to get into even a short-term relationship with women, because they aren't attracted to him in the first place.
This is relevant because most women are physically attractive enough to most men.
That means the baseline filter that men face, whether a woman is attracted to them at all, is much less strict for women. If a woman finds a man's personality appealing, she can usually act on that because odds are that the man already finds her physically attractive. This creates a big asymmetry. Women can select the guy with the personality they desire, and since their physical attractiveness already guarantees them options, they have the freedom to prioritize whichever personality traits they like best.
Men don't have that freedom. Most women are not attracted to most men, which severely limits the pool available to them. A guy can't simply pick a woman with the personality he likes best, because if she isn't into him physically, her personality doesn't matter, she's never an option
It's not that personality doesn't matter to men; it's that the women whose personalities they'd actually like often don't find them attractive in the first place.
Women often complain about men "objectifying" them or not appreciating their personalities, but their situation is the opposite, since almost any guy they're into personality-wise will already be attracted to them; they can prioritize compatibility and filter out men who just want them for looks. They can afford to be pickier about personality because their pool is so wide. The only time women end up feeling like there are "no good guys" is when they themselves narrow their definition of "physically attractive enough" so much that they shrink their own pool. In other words, if they can't find compatible men, it's usually because they've excluded too many options, not because men are inherently unwilling to care about their personalities.



IDC IF YOU RESPOND DNR JUST PUT A THUMB UP CUZ THIS IS FR Y’ALL LIVES

HIG IQ THREAD

 

[iblamealek]

Bump

 

[sillybilly]

For most people, physical attraction is a prerequisite, with personality serving as an enhancer. For example, a guy with a great personality who isn't physically attractive enough will often get friend-zoned, while a good-looking guy with a terrible personality can still secure at least
some kind of non-platonic relationship with women. Even if that relationship doesn't last long because of his personality, he's still able to get into a relationship with women in at least some way. The bad-looking guy with a great personality is never able to get into even a short-term relationship with women, because they aren't attracted to him in the first place.
This is relevant because most women are physically attractive enough to most men.
That means the baseline filter that men face, whether a woman is attracted to them at all, is much less strict for women. If a woman finds a man's personality appealing, she can usually act on that because odds are that the man already finds her physically attractive. This creates a big asymmetry. Women can select the guy with the personality they desire, and since their physical attractiveness already guarantees them options, they have the freedom to prioritize whichever personality traits they like best.
Men don't have that freedom. Most women are not attracted to most men, which severely limits the pool available to them. A guy can't simply pick a woman with the personality he likes best, because if she isn't into him physically, her personality doesn't matter, she's never an option
It's not that personality doesn't matter to men; it's that the women whose personalities they'd actually like often don't find them attractive in the first place.
Women often complain about men "objectifying" them or not appreciating their personalities, but their situation is the opposite, since almost any guy they're into personality-wise will already be attracted to them; they can prioritize compatibility and filter out men who just want them for looks. They can afford to be pickier about personality because their pool is so wide. The only time women end up feeling like there are "no good guys" is when they themselves narrow their definition of "physically attractive enough" so much that they shrink their own pool. In other words, if they can't find compatible men, it's usually because they've excluded too many options, not because men are inherently unwilling to care about their personalities.



IDC IF YOU RESPOND DNR JUST PUT A THUMB UP CUZ THIS IS FR Y’ALL LIVES

HIG IQ THREAD

water thread

 

[silently_said]

personality detector when it comes to sniffing out a poster on an obscure internet forum vs. personality detector when it comes to identifying a rapist, serial killer, gang member

 

[eon]

cmon make a tldr

 

[iblamealek]

Bump

 

[NotaChadyet]

You didnt have to put the incel rage part its just facts not any rage rant

 

[kisuke]

For most people, physical attraction is a prerequisite, with personality serving as an enhancer. For example, a guy with a great personality who isn't physically attractive enough will often get friend-zoned, while a good-looking guy with a terrible personality can still secure at least
some kind of non-platonic relationship with women. Even if that relationship doesn't last long because of his personality, he's still able to get into a relationship with women in at least some way. The bad-looking guy with a great personality is never able to get into even a short-term relationship with women, because they aren't attracted to him in the first place.
This is relevant because most women are physically attractive enough to most men.
That means the baseline filter that men face, whether a woman is attracted to them at all, is much less strict for women. If a woman finds a man's personality appealing, she can usually act on that because odds are that the man already finds her physically attractive. This creates a big asymmetry. Women can select the guy with the personality they desire, and since their physical attractiveness already guarantees them options, they have the freedom to prioritize whichever personality traits they like best.
Men don't have that freedom. Most women are not attracted to most men, which severely limits the pool available to them. A guy can't simply pick a woman with the personality he likes best, because if she isn't into him physically, her personality doesn't matter, she's never an option
It's not that personality doesn't matter to men; it's that the women whose personalities they'd actually like often don't find them attractive in the first place.
Women often complain about men "objectifying" them or not appreciating their personalities, but their situation is the opposite, since almost any guy they're into personality-wise will already be attracted to them; they can prioritize compatibility and filter out men who just want them for looks. They can afford to be pickier about personality because their pool is so wide. The only time women end up feeling like there are "no good guys" is when they themselves narrow their definition of "physically attractive enough" so much that they shrink their own pool. In other words, if they can't find compatible men, it's usually because they've excluded too many options, not because men are inherently unwilling to care about their personalities.



IDC IF YOU RESPOND DNR JUST PUT A THUMB UP CUZ THIS IS FR Y’ALL LIVES

HIG IQ THREAD

water but explained well , physical attraction will always triumph because it's the only factor of attraction that genuinely sends a message to a woman's body , no amount of personality can defeat that so this issue is unsolvable

 

[iblamealek]

You didnt have to put the incel rage part its just facts not any rage rant

Ik ik just wanted more attention

 

[eyewideshut]

A summary of a terrible personality usually comes with Machiavellianism, an idea of a terrible personality is a defined 'label' that you see fit in YOUR head. A personality a girl finds attractive can differ if you are thinking about it logically. I know MTN's that have a 'shit personality' but they have traits you only notice if you are with them 24/7, like confidence, dominance, or social pull. They make it work behind the scenes. Ofc a good looking guy with a genuinely shit personality will find themselves with women but it's the fact that you don't date to dump, (unless you are slaying.) You date to possibly commit for the rest of your life. Are those guy's winning in that aspect? no.

But your story just further proves points of blackpill we know. No shit a good looking dude is going to do better then some genuine, grounded, ugly guy.

 

[SA7]

Not a single word

 

[CorinthianLOX]

Water

 

[mrdouchebag]

Can you measure a good personality? No. What is a good personality? Noone can come up with a consistent answer.
Personality is just ugly and broke people's cope. You only need some balls, some social fluency and charisma, and to socialize enough and play the numbers game, with dating apps as supplementary. What I mean by this is: don't be timid, don't be socially awkward, go out and socialize. After that, it's just the purely superficial stuff that matter. Looks(most important), money and status. That's it.

Also, men heavily prioritize looks when it comes to committing, putting max effort and investing fully in a woman. They'll go for the hottest woman they can get and they'll cash almost all their chips in looks. Whether that's a 3, a 5 or an 8, it depends on the man. For some men the best they can get with max investment is a 3, for others it's a 9.

I am so tired of people, both blackpillers and redpillers, parroting this same complete "men find most women attractive" bullshit, bruv. It should be changed to "men have a lower disgust factor and are willing to fuck a larger percentage of women, but only if it takes little to no effort, investment and commitment". When men are going to go all in in a woman, they go for the hottest woman they can get at that point in time. Men that have considerably above average social status, money, network and are living in a favorable usually date women hotter than them, unless they had gotten with the bitch when they were brokies. You might claim those women don't truly "desire" them, which might be the case, but it matters little. It's all about securing top tier genes, and money is a small price to pay generally, as long as the bare minimum and your basic needs are secured. Hoarding money is pointless, since you can't take it with you to the afterlife. Plus if you have huuuuuge amounts of money, there are trusts and prenups to protect most of it, or just never get married and have a financial arrangement with the woman without involving the government if that's what you fear.

Last but not least, the notion that a man, any man, is as attracted to some random average becky as he is to someone like Adriana Lima is ridiculous and completely retarded. IT. IS. NOT. EVEN. CLOSE.
There is no fucking threshold and there are no diminishing returns when it comes to physical attractiveness until you get to the elite tiers like 8+/10.
Give the average joe 10 billion dollars and he'll start dating and fucking supermodels. Ain't no way he is staying with his mid girlfriend.

 

[stamaster21]

For most people, physical attraction is a prerequisite, with personality serving as an enhancer. For example, a guy with a great personality who isn't physically attractive enough will often get friend-zoned, while a good-looking guy with a terrible personality can still secure at least
some kind of non-platonic relationship with women. Even if that relationship doesn't last long because of his personality, he's still able to get into a relationship with women in at least some way. The bad-looking guy with a great personality is never able to get into even a short-term relationship with women, because they aren't attracted to him in the first place.
This is relevant because most women are physically attractive enough to most men.
That means the baseline filter that men face, whether a woman is attracted to them at all, is much less strict for women. If a woman finds a man's personality appealing, she can usually act on that because odds are that the man already finds her physically attractive. This creates a big asymmetry. Women can select the guy with the personality they desire, and since their physical attractiveness already guarantees them options, they have the freedom to prioritize whichever personality traits they like best.
Men don't have that freedom. Most women are not attracted to most men, which severely limits the pool available to them. A guy can't simply pick a woman with the personality he likes best, because if she isn't into him physically, her personality doesn't matter, she's never an option
It's not that personality doesn't matter to men; it's that the women whose personalities they'd actually like often don't find them attractive in the first place.
Women often complain about men "objectifying" them or not appreciating their personalities, but their situation is the opposite, since almost any guy they're into personality-wise will already be attracted to them; they can prioritize compatibility and filter out men who just want them for looks. They can afford to be pickier about personality because their pool is so wide. The only time women end up feeling like there are "no good guys" is when they themselves narrow their definition of "physically attractive enough" so much that they shrink their own pool. In other words, if they can't find compatible men, it's usually because they've excluded too many options, not because men are inherently unwilling to care about their personalities.



IDC IF YOU RESPOND DNR JUST PUT A THUMB UP CUZ THIS IS FR Y’ALL LIVES

HIG IQ THREAD

Interesting read
we already have dating app data, men swipe yes on 51 percent of women and women swipes yes only on 12 percent of men.
When women say men only care about looks, its a mating tactic one its a way for men to lower their physical standards, second this is a signal mostly to the top 1-30 percent of men. Regardless of age and class and economic rank it will always be a small pool of desired men banging a much larger pool of women. Women standards in men is much higher then mens standards in women, women already know this, when they say men only care about looks its a defensive way to shame the men their not attracted to into going after lower ranking women.

One tactic women will do is try to convince the other 75-70 percent of men on shaming or excluding the top 1-30 percent of men socially, for not practicing mating norms or tactics that benefit women. They will bring up how its morally wrong for those top men to treat women this way and if the other 70-75 men dont shame said top men there just as bad. They will bring up society and small children etc, but it never works in mass because those 70-75 percent of men don't get sexual access or benefit, it does work only a small percentage of say 1-3 percent of simp men. So you will have women complain to this small group of men, and those men will think if i just show her how good of a guy iam she will give me sexual access and ill bad mouth those evil men.

This leads to a decline in society along with mens decline to protect women and children, all this moral talk doesnt matter. Its do the men benefit from sexual access and or their own children. Moral shame and talk about duty is not gonna make men protect all the women and children if they get no benefit. You end up with women and children less protected and a more unstable society. The women will bring up what if it was your mother or children, but guess what ITS NOT. Women are physically weaker so they try to get other men into shaming other men into protecting all the women and children, guess what it never works unless you can do it by force and that never happens. Thats why you see a rise in violent crimes agaisnt women and children in public. And men respond by saying wdf would i risk my life or well being to help a random women/children, those arnt my CHILDREN and said women is not giving me sexual access, the men of her family or the men shes having sexual relations with should help her NOT ME. This is a problem for society as when women have sexual relations with a much smaller pool of desired men, those men cannot be around all the time to protect the women and children. Women in turn try to turn these issues into a MEN problem and bring up talks about community and society and children. Biology and human nature doesnt care about community , society and children. Wanna know go ask the women of afgahnistand , the usa government stop sending checks in for the afghan army men, and all the men walked in and turned in the guns and uniform and went home Men mainly for for protection of their own women and children/family or for sexual access and resources.

 

[EvilSatanArseRapist]

For most people, physical attraction is a prerequisite, with personality serving as an enhancer. For example, a guy with a great personality who isn't physically attractive enough will often get friend-zoned, while a good-looking guy with a terrible personality can still secure at least
some kind of non-platonic relationship with women. Even if that relationship doesn't last long because of his personality, he's still able to get into a relationship with women in at least some way. The bad-looking guy with a great personality is never able to get into even a short-term relationship with women, because they aren't attracted to him in the first place.
This is relevant because most women are physically attractive enough to most men.
That means the baseline filter that men face, whether a woman is attracted to them at all, is much less strict for women. If a woman finds a man's personality appealing, she can usually act on that because odds are that the man already finds her physically attractive. This creates a big asymmetry. Women can select the guy with the personality they desire, and since their physical attractiveness already guarantees them options, they have the freedom to prioritize whichever personality traits they like best.
Men don't have that freedom. Most women are not attracted to most men, which severely limits the pool available to them. A guy can't simply pick a woman with the personality he likes best, because if she isn't into him physically, her personality doesn't matter, she's never an option
It's not that personality doesn't matter to men; it's that the women whose personalities they'd actually like often don't find them attractive in the first place.
Women often complain about men "objectifying" them or not appreciating their personalities, but their situation is the opposite, since almost any guy they're into personality-wise will already be attracted to them; they can prioritize compatibility and filter out men who just want them for looks. They can afford to be pickier about personality because their pool is so wide. The only time women end up feeling like there are "no good guys" is when they themselves narrow their definition of "physically attractive enough" so much that they shrink their own pool. In other words, if they can't find compatible men, it's usually because they've excluded too many options, not because men are inherently unwilling to care about their personalities.



IDC IF YOU RESPOND DNR JUST PUT A THUMB UP CUZ THIS IS FR Y’ALL LIVES

HIG IQ THREAD

Dnr. Prolly just a basic biochemistry pill. Still mirin effort

 

[auitistsurvior]

HEY SOME GUY NAMED NECROMANCER ON TİKTOK STOLE YOUR THREAD

 

[auitistsurvior]

maybe you are the guy since you have verified badge tho im fucking reatarded rn jfl

 

[disillusioned]

Can you measure a good personality? No. What is a good personality? Noone can come up with a consistent answer.
Personality is just ugly and broke people's cope. You only need some balls, some social fluency and charisma, and to socialize enough and play the numbers game, with dating apps as supplementary. What I mean by this is: don't be timid, don't be socially awkward, go out and socialize. After that, it's just the purely superficial stuff that matter. Looks(most important), money and status. That's it.

THIS.

FUCKING THIS.

I've said this so many times. 'Good personality' isn't actually a thing that exists. Most 'good' personality traits ultimately just come down to not being retarded and stupid. Yet shockingly, even that probably puts you ahead of the curve considering that most normies are in fact retarded and stupid

 

[davidlaidisme67]

For most people, physical attraction is a prerequisite, with personality serving as an enhancer. For example, a guy with a great personality who isn't physically attractive enough will often get friend-zoned, while a good-looking guy with a terrible personality can still secure at least
some kind of non-platonic relationship with women. Even if that relationship doesn't last long because of his personality, he's still able to get into a relationship with women in at least some way. The bad-looking guy with a great personality is never able to get into even a short-term relationship with women, because they aren't attracted to him in the first place.
This is relevant because most women are physically attractive enough to most men.
That means the baseline filter that men face, whether a woman is attracted to them at all, is much less strict for women. If a woman finds a man's personality appealing, she can usually act on that because odds are that the man already finds her physically attractive. This creates a big asymmetry. Women can select the guy with the personality they desire, and since their physical attractiveness already guarantees them options, they have the freedom to prioritize whichever personality traits they like best.
Men don't have that freedom. Most women are not attracted to most men, which severely limits the pool available to them. A guy can't simply pick a woman with the personality he likes best, because if she isn't into him physically, her personality doesn't matter, she's never an option
It's not that personality doesn't matter to men; it's that the women whose personalities they'd actually like often don't find them attractive in the first place.
Women often complain about men "objectifying" them or not appreciating their personalities, but their situation is the opposite, since almost any guy they're into personality-wise will already be attracted to them; they can prioritize compatibility and filter out men who just want them for looks. They can afford to be pickier about personality because their pool is so wide. The only time women end up feeling like there are "no good guys" is when they themselves narrow their definition of "physically attractive enough" so much that they shrink their own pool. In other words, if they can't find compatible men, it's usually because they've excluded too many options, not because men are inherently unwilling to care about their personalities.



IDC IF YOU RESPOND DNR JUST PUT A THUMB UP CUZ THIS IS FR Y’ALL LIVES

HIG IQ THREAD

I hate my face fuckkkk