Women perceive subsequent sexual partners with increasing inferiority (especially right after their first)

Reckless Turtle

Reckless Turtle

Kraken
Joined
Jul 29, 2021
Posts
17,143
Reputation
23,782
Assuming that women are incentivized to reproduce using the best genes:

If a man knows that a woman has had previous sexual partners, yet proceeds to have sex with her (worse; provides for her) then he is inferior for knowingly engaging in a situation with reduced paternity certainty.

If a man doesn't know that a woman has had previous sexual partners, yet proceeds to have sex with her (worse; provides for her) then he is inferior for being deceived or negligent about his paternity certainty.

Either scenario reveals reduced genetic quality.
 
  • +1
Reactions: aBetterMii, Chadeep and WhiteGoodman
Paternity certainty doesn't matter today, and women can sleep with a better looking guy than the guy before and know that he has better genes.
 
  • +1
Reactions: fogdart and ifyouwannabemylover
brutal for yerger that inferior cuck
 
Assuming that women are incentivized to reproduce using the best genes:

If a man knows that a woman has had previous sexual partners, yet proceeds to have sex with her (worse; provides for her) then he is inferior for knowingly engaging in a situation with reduced paternity certainty.

If a man doesn't know that a woman has had previous sexual partners, yet proceeds to have sex with her (worse; provides for her) then he is inferior for being deceived or negligent about his paternity certainty.

Either scenario reveals reduced genetic quality.
low iq yet again. Men have very little to lose when reproducing, thus it is no issue for them to fuck whores. Only when investing resources do these men lose out
 
  • +1
Reactions: fogdart and Prettyboy
Humans didn't evolve today.
It could only have mattered when there was nuclear family + no contraception, so probably from the Neolithic to modern times.

Before that, men just fucked women and left, they didn't stay around to provide, so they weren't perceived as inferior when they slept with them.
 
Michael Yerger? He's obviously using Daisy Keech for clout, so that situation has an extra layer.
he's gonna breed her tho? obviously if it comes to that he lost in this situation
 
low iq yet again. Men have very little to lose when reproducing, thus it is no issue for them to fuck whores. Only when investing resources do these men lose out
Low IQ reading comprehension.
 
men investing = bad
Men fucking = nothing
It isn't "nothing" because men still have a refractory period and sex has an inherent cost, even for men with otherwise superior genes, but your low IQ reading comprehension is due to the fact that I explicitly mentioned the significantly increased detriment for investment.
 
It isn't "nothing" because men still have a refractory period and sex has an inherent cost, even for men with otherwise superior genes, but your low IQ reading comprehension is due to the fact that I explicitly mentioned the significantly increased detriment for investment.
You're an idiot. The male refractory period is minutes/hours. Sex has no cost for men, it's only costly for women. Go pick up a biology textbook idiot.
>t.studying biology at uni
 
  • +1
Reactions: fogdart and Deleted member 16801
You're an idiot. The male refractory period is minutes/hours.
You're an idiot. The relevant refractory period also involves the amount of ejaculate and sperm released.
Sex has no cost for men,
Just completely ignore male intrasexual competition and STDs.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14905
You're an idiot. The relevant refractory period also involves the amount of ejaculate and sperm released.

Just completely ignore male intrasexual competition and STDs.
The amount of sperm you need to impregnate one woman is one cell. Men impregnate women with fucking precum jfl

What are you on about? A man's biological urge is to literally fuck as many women as possible jfl
 
The amount of sperm you need to impregnate one woman is one cell. Men impregnate women with fucking precum jfl
Yes, but an individual sperm has a low likelihood of surviving to reach the egg, which is why millions are ejaculated. Pregnancy rates are substantially less from precum than full ejaculate, for that exact reason.
What are you on about? A man's biological urge is to literally fuck as many fertile women as possible jfl
 
Yes, but an individual sperm has a low likelihood of surviving to reach the egg, which is why millions are ejaculated. Pregnancy rates are substantially less from precum than full ejaculate, for that exact reason.
Yes ofc, but point being within 24 hours a man will be quite fertile. Mens fertility doesn't decrease everytime they cum
 
Yes ofc, but point being within 24 hours a man will be quite fertile. Mens fertility doesn't decrease everytime they cum
yes it does. have u tried abstaining for more than a week or 2 then blowing a load? the difference in the amount of shooting and cum quality is nowhere near compared when it's a daily thing, that's my experience tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14905
aka monkey branching
 
yes it does. have u tried abstaining for more than a week or 2 then blowing a load? the difference in the amount of shooting and cum quality is nowhere near compared when it's a daily thing, that's my experience tho
your quality of sperm =/= quantity
 
if you're not the best she's ever had then you're automatically in a really cucked situation

you need to mog everyone that came before you
 
quality and quantity, it's all enhanced 100x when u abstain for a while
Quantity, sure.
Quality I'm not too sure, abstaining for super long times will cause some sperm cells to be defective since it's been stored for so long
 
Quantity, sure.
Quality I'm not too sure, abstaining for super long times will cause some sperm cells to be defective since it's been stored for so long
lol that's cope, where did u hear that from where sperm goes bad when u don't use it for too long:ROFLMAO:
 
lol that's cope, where did u hear that from where sperm goes bad when u don't use it for too long:ROFLMAO:

Anymore?
 
so if 6'2 chad comes after 5'7 normie then who mogs?
The subsequent partner cannot mog the prior in all aspects because the latter had statistically reduced paternity certainty (at least transitioning from the cherry popper to the second partner).
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ifyouwannabemylover
The subsequent partner cannot mog the prior in all aspects because the latter had statistically reduced paternity certainty (at least transitioning from the cherry popper to the second partner).
that is mindblowing
 

Anymore?
dn rd, i don't need studies or bs articles to tell me how unhealthy sperm can get when i can literally observe the drastic difference with my own experience
 

Anymore?
You linked an article supporting my point that you called me an idiot for.

Motility barely decreases after 7 days, yet sperm count more than doubles. The motility only starts to significantly decline after a week.
4d5aQIE.png
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: thickdickdaddy27
dn rd, i don't need studies or bs articles to tell me how unhealthy sperm can get when i can literally observe the drastic difference with my own experience
you're an idiot, quanity =/= quality. Unless you have a microscope and can see the morphology of your sperm and measure the motility, you can't tell shit about the quality
 
You linked an article supporting my point that you called me an idiot for.

Motility barely decreases after 7 days, yet sperm count more than doubles.
4d5aQIE.png
sperm morpholgy drops though
 
you're an idiot, quanity =/= quality. Unless you have a microscope and can see the morphology of your sperm and measure the motility, you can't tell shit about the quality
lol if it helps u sleep at night, go ahead jack off and drift to sleep peacefully:feelsyay:
 
lol if it helps u sleep at night, go ahead jack off and drift to sleep peacefully:feelsyay:
If I was trying to have kids, I'd be regularly fucking my wife and not doing this stupid semen retention shit
 
If I was trying to have kids, I'd be regularly fucking my wife and not doing this stupid semen retention shit
by all means necessary when all it takes for chad is one night of a healthy load seeded deep inside
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 14905
If I was trying to have kids, I'd be regularly fucking my wife and not doing this stupid semen retention shit
You'd be an idiot because your wife would only be fertile for a few days per month, and your load would be less immediately effective during that window.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 14905
Only significantly after a week.
Okay let's be clear about what we are debating. We are debating sperm quality here. Not quantity.

The quality lowers during abstinence which you agree with too.
You say the quantity compensates for it, making you more fertile.

But think about this for 1 second.

In the space of 2 days if you cum inside a girl twice, you pump 130.6mx2 sperm + higher quality sperm, whereas if you abstained for a day, and only cummed once. You cum 140m sperm and lower quality.

Thus for the sake of breeding and quality cumming inside everyday is superior
 
low iq yet again. Men have very little to lose when reproducing, thus it is no issue for them to fuck whores. Only when investing resources do these men lose out
Yes I think this is closer to the truth. You’re only losing if you are spending resources on them. If you just breed her and go on it doesn’t matter how many guys she previously had, your biological goal has been fulfilled with minimal effort
 
  • +1
Reactions: FailedNormieManlet
The quality lowers during abstinence which you agree with too.
Only significantly after a week... You don't even read what you respond to, nor the articles that you link, yet have the audacity to call others idiots. Good luck with theorycrafting passing on your idiot genes.
 
Only after a week... You don't even read what you respond to, nor the articles that you link, yet have the audacity to call others idiots. Good luck with theorycrafting passing on your idiot genes.
Sperm morphology literally lessened by 0.6% in the table.....
 
low iq thread. this doesnt really matter since from an evolutionary standpoint males are supposed to spread their seed among as many women as possible
 
Assuming that women are incentivized to reproduce using the best genes:

If a man knows that a woman has had previous sexual partners, yet proceeds to have sex with her (worse; provides for her) then he is inferior for knowingly engaging in a situation with reduced paternity certainty.

If a man doesn't know that a woman has had previous sexual partners, yet proceeds to have sex with her (worse; provides for her) then he is inferior for being deceived or negligent about his paternity certainty.

Either scenario reveals reduced genetic quality.
Useless theory. So many women lose their virginities to subhumans/normies when they're young but later realize their worth and become "Chad only" hence the theory "just be first". So many attractive women realize their true SMV when they get older (by older I mean in their 20s)
 
low iq thread. this doesnt really matter since from an evolutionary standpoint males are supposed to spread their seed among as many women as possible
Low IQ comment. Those women actually have to be fertile.
 
Useless theory. So many women lose their virginities to subhumans/normies when they're young but later realize their worth and become "Chad only" hence the theory "just be first". So many attractive women realize their true SMV when they get older (by older I mean in their 20s)
Nothing you wrote made this theory useless. Frankly, it seems like this thread has triggered slut fuckers who can't apply enough common sense to realize that, all other factors controlled for, virgin women are statistically more likely to be fertile than women who are already sexually active.
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: fogdart

Similar threads

vratisevojvodo
Blackpill Mutual Attraction
Replies
32
Views
2K
LVZZO
LVZZO
Zenis
Replies
87
Views
10K
crushing sluts@100%
crushing sluts@100%
LegitUser
Replies
95
Views
10K
Samiscool234
Samiscool234
chief detectiveman
Replies
12
Views
6K
slavicpsycho
slavicpsycho
BucketCrab
Replies
69
Views
10K
nordic_ascender
N

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top