Women want to be seen as high status

D

Dbeyduvudhs

Kraken
Joined
May 30, 2020
Posts
3,729
Reputation
1,891
They will pick a guy who has tattoos blonde colored mgk hair earrings and current stylish clothing over a out of the loop male model any day.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: thecel and Copeful
They’ll only choose an uglier male over a good looking male if he has gigachad status. Aside from this, they’ll choose the better looking guy in 99% of cases
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5891, Gaia262, Deleted member 6128 and 5 others
FASHIONMAX
BE NICE TO WOMEN
SMILE MORE BRO



ITcel spotted
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6128, Fear, Deleted member 245 and 1 other person
Posts133 Reputation52
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 5349
They will pick a guy who has tattoos blonde colored mgk hair earrings and current stylish clothing over a out of the loop male model any day.
Maybe to betabuxx, chad can wear a potato sack, dad glasses, be bald and still get her pussy wet
Keep coping though I’m sure it makes you happy
Also even if she betabuxxed the statusmax she’s fucking potato sack chad on the side
 
They’ll only choose an uglier male over a good looking male if he has gigachad status. Aside from this, they’ll choose the better looking guy in 99% of cases
Most women don’t even know what really constitutes an attractive face.
They look for cues(most are social) to determine if a male is one of the attractive ones.
It’s similar to how the Mandela effect works. Our brains fill in gaps to save time and analysis.
 
Maybe to betabuxx, chad can wear a potato sack, dad glasses, be bald and still get her pussy wet
Keep coping though I’m sure it makes you happy
Also even if she betabuxxed the statusmax she’s fucking potato sack chad on the side
I’m open to the idea that this is right. However I have massive extensive real life experience to back up what I am saying.
 
The people I will defer to are those who have done a lot of tinder experiments. Since those allow for huge sample sizes in short order.
 
Most women don’t even know what really constitutes an attractive face.
They look for cues(most are social) to determine if a male is one of the attractive ones.
It’s similar to how the Mandela effect works. Our brains fill in gaps to save time and analysis.
What are the cues?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Copeful
What are the cues?
I just told you... earrings tattoos. Jaws/chins... whatever the current hairstyle/color is

keep in mind there is very little objectivity to looks as in some cultures it’s hot to be a fat man or a man with hugely stretched out ear lobes.

in each of these instances women are using societal cues to denote what is attractive.
 
I just told you... earrings tattoos. Jaws/chins... whatever the current hairstyle/color is

keep in mind there is very little objectivity to looks as in some cultures it’s hot to be a fat man or a man with hugely stretched out ear lobes.

in each of these instances women are using societal cues to denote what is attractive.

in certain cultures

blackpill is based off biological science
 
Most women don’t even know what really constitutes an attractive face.
They look for cues(most are social) to determine if a male is one of the attractive ones.
It’s similar to how the Mandela effect works. Our brains fill in gaps to save time and analysis.

they can easily tell an ugly from an attractive male as you can with an ugly and fine female
 
  • +1
Reactions: softlysoftly
You are right that they want to be high status. But a male model who is socially inept has a higher social status and sexual market value than an unattractive man who is socially aware and wears current fashion, had tattoos, etc., just like the man you described.

A woman would have a superior social status with a male model, because an attractive man has an incredible social value regardless of his behavior or “personality”. This is why attractive men can act in many different ways but they are still always considered socially desirable.

The evidence does not lie. Looks are the important variable, not fashion or behavior or social status. That doesnt mean those things are irrelevant but the evidence shows that they are nowhere near as important as looks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 245 and Deleted member 6403
I just told you... earrings tattoos. Jaws/chins... whatever the current hairstyle/color is

keep in mind there is very little objectivity to looks as in some cultures it’s hot to be a fat man or a man with hugely stretched out ear lobes.

in each of these instances women are using societal cues to denote what is attractive.
So earrings make you more attractive?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 6403
they can easily tell an ugly from an attractive male as you can with an ugly and fine female
Ugly and attractive are too big of a discrepancy. I can assure top tier club promoters who are not good looking have way more abundance than an average male model.
 
So earrings make you more attractive?
They signal that you’re one of the attractive ones. Yes.
 
Ugly and attractive are too big of a discrepancy. I can assure top tier club promoters who are not good looking have way more abundance than an average male model.

nope, remember that we’re animals and our goal is to survive and reproduce,

if your idea of an average model is psl6 then a female is always going to choose the model since the offspring will have a higher chance of survival

unless the club promoter has extremely high status, looks beat status
 
They signal that you’re one of the attractive ones. Yes.

you linked a nigga that’s attractive due to his status not his “earrings”
 
They signal that you’re one of the attractive ones. Yes.
Damn really why is that? Why do they signal your one of the attractive ones? I’ve seen plenty of good looking dudes without either
 
E9D67827 E02A 4ED5 824E 1CAF0515397F
D4C5B452 B871 44FC ADC0 78B0BB22EBA2

So your saying the guy on the right is more attractive?

both have status so you can’t use that as an excuse now
 
nope, remember that we’re animals and our goal is to survive and reproduce,

if your idea of an average model is psl6 then a female is always going to choose the model since the offspring will have a higher chance of survival

unless the club promoter has extremely high status, looks beat status

looks have almost to baring on survival. Resources do. evo psych doesn’t do a good job of explaining the importance of male beauty.
 
Damn really why is that? Why do they signal your one of the attractive ones? I’ve seen plenty of good looking dudes without either
I’m telling you how females judge a man. The way you judge a man is not the same. You are using your recollection of what females liked in your past to make an assumption on who they may like
 
The guy on the left has 80 times the status as the guy on the right. You need to post a hot poorly dressed guy vs an average socially adjusted male



read the comments, thats all the proof u need
 
I’m telling you how females judge a man. The way you judge a man is not the same. You are using your recollection of what females liked in your past to make an assumption on who they may like
Dude the best looking chad I’ve seen always has girls with him has neither. Same with this male model that goes to my gym he has neither and has a fine ass girl with him. If your a chad you don’t need tattoos or earrings.
 


read the comments, thats all the proof u need

Ok so you just made a point that looks are a form of survival then reinforced that point by showing a gl guy who has 0 survival skill

any way his face symbolizes status. Because male models are on billboards in North America seeing a face that resembles one is a signal of status.
Please read up I included facial features as a means of signaling status.
 
Ok so you just made a point that looks are a form of survival then reinforced that point by showing a gl guy who has 0 survival skill

any way his face symbolizes status. Because male models are on billboards in North America seeing a face that resembles one is a signal of status.
Please read up I included facial features as a means of signaling status.

I’m done, Keep coping
 
I’m open to the idea that this is right. However I have massive extensive real life experience to back up what I am saying.
if your goal is JUST to have an ltr or JUST to have a ons then yeah status works
however if you want her to like you for YOU, the only way to do that is to get really lucky or be good looking (aka get lucky at birth)
also the kind of women that are fucking statusmaxxed guys are snakelike gold diggers that want to take advantage of you at every opportunity, not worth it
 
if your goal is JUST to have an ltr or JUST to have a ons then yeah status works
however if you want her to like you for YOU, the only way to do that is to get really lucky or be good looking (aka get lucky at birth)
also the kind of women that are fucking statusmaxxed guys are snakelike gold diggers that want to take advantage of you at every opportunity, not worth it

I’m arguing that good looks are a form of high status.

I gave examples of cultures where high status aka good looks are fat males, or males with overly stretched ears
 
I’m arguing that good looks are a form of high status.

I gave examples of cultures where high status aka good looks are fat males, or males with overly stretched ears
lots of fat old disgusting and/or autistic looking millionaires and billionaires out there. Yet somehow Bill Gates isn't the new beauty standard.
 
lots of fat old disgusting and/or autistic looking millionaires and billionaires out there. Yet somehow Bill Gates isn't the new beauty standard.
That’s not high status. Being old and fat and ugly is low status.
 
They will pick a guy who has tattoos blonde colored mgk hair earrings and current stylish clothing over a out of the loop male model any day.
1597044775819

:p
 
Being old and fat and ugly is low status.
A lot of old fat boomers are rich and do actually have high social status. There are many cases of old boomers stealing agematched looksmatched women from young truecels. The only rebuttal to this is "MUH BETABUX".
 
That’s not high status. Being old and fat and ugly is low status.

Status = fame
Generally the disgusting looking billionaires are also famous, to pretend they don’t have status just to try to prove your point is asinine.

Anyway what makes someone attractive is dimorphic traits and traits that show healthy development and good genes. These are constant and people will ALWAYS be attracted to them.

The only looks related thing that status can change is which hairstyles are popular, which clothes are popular, which niche is popular etc. Always remember that when a girl says she likes nerds that means chad with glasses, goths means chad with dyed black hair etc

Michael Cera has status, he’s a famous actor, girls still aren’t getting wet for michael cera looking guys
 
Status = fame
Generally the disgusting looking billionaires are also famous, to pretend they don’t have status just to try to prove your point is asinine.

Anyway what makes someone attractive is dimorphic traits and traits that show healthy development and good genes. These are constant and people will ALWAYS be attracted to them.

The only looks related thing that status can change is which hairstyles are popular, which clothes are popular, which niche is popular etc. Always remember that when a girl says she likes nerds that means chad with glasses, goths means chad with dyed black hair etc

Michael Cera has status, he’s a famous actor, girls still aren’t getting wet for michael cera looking guys

No status is an evolutionary attraction trigger. Fame is fairly modern and due to television and other forms of mass media.

Before fame there was still status.

Another very easy way to dismiss the status = fame argument is a hated famous man.
Harvey Weinstein is very famous but for negative (Socially ugly) reasons, therefore he has low status.

Micheal cera could status max like the Instagram guy I posted. Muscles aren’t attractive for some evolutionary bullshit reason, they’re attractive because of the connotation between them and status (athletics, models,) think media.

the evolutionary arguments for looks are shoddy at best. For the majority of evolution we walked around as smelly hairy beasts with big beards (concealing the lower third)

caveman were doing tattoo type things though to denote high status tribal men. These were cues to who was cool and who wasn’t.

There are baseline indicators of health such as skin coloring hair thickness. And indicators of age and indicators of maxilla facial development but as you can see even the top models like Barrett didn’t have perfect development (wisdom teeth removed)
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top