Women's features don't age equally

uksucks

uksucks

Mistral
Joined
Sep 10, 2024
Posts
2,021
Reputation
2,620
Yeah go for JBs but if you want a family, ultimately the JB mother will grow old. You want her looking attractive at 40 still.

So you want good enough bones in a woman but also the body is important.

Ages well: long legs, big nice shaped tits, good hip to waste ratio.

Ages badly: a big ass or a nice ass.

Saggy tits is cope. A 40yr old with nice milkers is hot whereas most asses look disgusting when pushing 40-50
 
  • +1
Reactions: VV62
Women with a robust bone structure can look fine due to youthfulness offering some softness to the face.

Most of them, however, look like trannies in their 40s.
Best example is your all beloved Brooke Shields, who descended rapidly after her teens.
 
  • +1
Reactions: uksucks
Yeah go for JBs but if you want a family, ultimately the JB mother will grow old. You want her looking attractive at 40 still.

So you want good enough bones in a woman but also the body is important.

Ages well: long legs, big nice shaped tits, good hip to waste ratio.

Ages badly: a big ass or a nice ass.

Saggy tits is cope. A 40yr old with nice milkers is hot whereas most asses look disgusting when pushing 40-50
But you’re almost never going to be having sex at 40+ so what’s the point?
 

Similar threads

SavyTerri
Replies
6
Views
646
Deleted member 107111
D
EverythingMattersCel
Replies
24
Views
2K
Ultimate Subhuman™
Ultimate Subhuman™
grungymallard97
Replies
63
Views
4K
diditeverbegin
diditeverbegin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top