Wondering about divisive 'unsolvable' topic of tinder photos...

[White_Bwoi]

RedPillers(copers) would make 1000 rules about how NT your photos must be, that there must be "5" of them, showing different facets of your life (lol) official/party/withadog/travels/sports/whatever. Even reasonably GL guys like (yes) Clavicular make threads how to maxx out your stats with nt photos..

Pure Blackpillers would say just take 2 selfies in a mirror and fuck off. For Chad that's enough.

My take is - you should not be like everyone else there, the more you TRYHARD the more cringe it is, I would rather have 3 cool photos only, than 7 to show off god knows what.
I will make an experiment with minimal numer of photos and vague, and I'm 100% sure I will have more matches then year ago when I had (maxed out photo slots) - one difference will be lean face vs bloated than


Kinda inpired by this ancient comment, Lord @Gandy if you're still here tell me if something changed...

ALL OF YOUR TINDER PHOTOS MUST BE GOOD

I recently downloaded tinder this week and got well over 50+ matches from high tier becky’s to stacylites. The first picture matters THE MOST. But it doesn’t mean that the rest don’t matter. My other 3 photos were mediocre, not showing great angles and bad lighting. I didn’t really care too...

looksmax.org

 

[White_Bwoi]

bump niggers

 

[White_Bwoi]

Comment in question. I would argue that's true, not the tryhard method of tindermaxxing (that's for normie looking garbage)