Would John Krasinski theoretically benefit from bimax?

[Deleted member 24208]

He is just an actor with downward growth. I would imagine, that if he were to post on here, people would suggest bimax. Would that actually be beneficial?

 

[Deleted member 16280]

Doesn’t look like he needs it. Man’s already a chadlite facially + his 6’3 height pretty much makes him a gigachad.

 

[Deleted member 24208]

Doesn’t look like he needs it. Man’s already a chadlite facially + his 6’3 height pretty much makes him a gigachad.

Yeah, I don’t think he needs it either, but he’s vertically grown. Forward growth is pushed more nowadays, so I was wondering.

 

[Deleted member 16280]

Yeah, I don’t think he needs it either, but he’s vertically grown. Forward growth is pushed more nowadays, so I was wondering.

He looks fine to me. Regardless he’s very good looking as it is, so it wouldn’t be worth the risks, time, pain, money, and years in braces.

 

[MadTwatter]

He's not recessed and doesn't have malocclusion. He just has a fat face.

 

[VenatorLuparius]

He's not recessed and doesn't have malocclusion. He just has a fat face.

Bunch of morons in here prescribing bimax left and right like pills : they know nothing.

 

[Deleted member 24208]

Bunch of morons in here prescribing bimax left and right like pills : they know nothing.

I am trying to decide what to do about my lower third. How do you decide which surgical option you choose, if you don't have bite issues (in horizontal plane).

 

[Deleted member 18361]

Doesn’t look like he needs it. Man’s already a chadlite facially + his 6’3 height pretty much makes him a gigachad.

yeah hes on the same level as chico bro

 

[Danish_Retard]

Doesn't look like he has any recession, he just doesn't have great foward growth

 

[Deleted member 24208]

Doesn't look like he has any recession, he just doesn't have great foward growth

I agree, it's just that many people here think that forward growth=life and that gonial angle has to be in certain range, but this guy, for example, contradicts it. I was just asking, if someone were to change his gonial angle to be smaller, if it would make any difference, either positive or even negative given that his midface is longer.

 

[Deleted member 2729]

Doesn’t look like he needs it. Man’s already a chadlite facially + his 6’3 height pretty much makes him a gigachad.

thats not a chadlite lmao

 

[Whatashame]

Yeah, I don’t think he needs it either, but he’s vertically grown. Forward growth is pushed more nowadays, so I was wondering.

Nowadays?? Tf is nowadays? Nowadays do u mean the last million years?

 

[Tylermax]

Ugly

 

[Whatashame]

I agree, it's just that many people here think that forward growth=life and that gonial angle has to be in certain range, but this guy, for example, contradicts it. I was just asking, if someone were to change his gonial angle to be smaller, if it would make any difference, either positive or even negative given that his midface is longer.

First he doesnt have a long face, its longish with sround 0.95, even 0.97 midface ratio, still in the ideal range. Of course he would look better with 1.0 midface ratio byt this isnt possible and bimax has nothing to do with. Gonial angle is not forward growth... u serm pretty lost if u have a doubt feel free to ask