![Deleted member 13970](/data/avatars/l/13/13970.jpg?1621629334)
Deleted member 13970
Iron
- Joined
- May 16, 2021
- Posts
- 71
- Reputation
- 150
titels
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
5’7 because to save on house costs making taller dar frames bigger bes ects the shekels need to be savedtitels
Ur retardee if u wouldnt choose 7ft. 5'7 copers are just people who are already small. They cant relate to being tall@GODmaxxing @Madhate the reason I asked this is because in another obscure forum the consensus by large seemed to be skewed to the latter option.
Wanted to know what this forum thought if proportions weren't a factor, think more Oliver Richters than Kareem Abdul Jabbar. The answer isn't that obvious apparently.
That'd be more up for debate but I wanted to see the general consensus as I posed the same question to normies and the other option was highly favouredA better comparison would be 6ft vs 7ft
They will infinitely pick 7 foot over anything under 6 foot.What's the point of having 7ft, when women will infinitely prefer a 6f guy to 6ft4?
Not to mention proportion problems, imagine if you had a medium-sized penis of that size?
Most likely but at that height it might be likely you might get a lanklet build which at that point it's over for you.They will infinitely pick 7 foot over anything under 6 foot.
lmao I was talking to a girl and she literally word for word said “A guy can never be too tall.”5ft7 anyday. 7foot means joint pains, can’t fit in clothes, awkward looking and die early. Also have heard women often say there is a such thing as too tall
Interesting that women describe their type as 6ft+ and never ‘between 6ft4-7ft’ . And no women don’t care about how rare that islmao I was talking to a girl and she literally word for word said “A guy can never be too tall.”