Wtf Matthew noska has no ramus

tinderhacker

tinderhacker

God’s Favorite
Joined
Jan 26, 2023
Posts
985
Reputation
1,326
Still 10/10.

0A9CB470 3513 48B2 840D B4ED0B91445C
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: 5'7 zoomer and Deleted member 27772
Nah tbh, no ramus looks like this

1680076719362
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 1901, 5'7 zoomer, p0lishsubhuman and 2 others
TBH, I am convinced more and more, than facial attractiveness in males is like 90% the function of LEANNESS and HIGH SKIN TONE (no laxity), no matter what your bones are... unless you are recessed ofc...

One just needs to have their face to be tapered...
 
TBH, I am convinced more and more, than facial attractiveness in males is like 90% the function of LEANNESS and HIGH SKIN TONE (no laxity), no matter what your bones are... unless you are recessed ofc...

One just needs to have their face to be tapered...
you still have a lot to learn old spo if you think the reassons why he is an attractive
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Artemis
Yeah his and Opry's ramuses are utter shit. But they have top tier chin to compensate for it.
Still looks unaesthetic tho especially in angles other than frontal.
 

Similar threads

Mrinfinityx
Replies
22
Views
222
smoth
smoth
Atakan
Replies
40
Views
540
LastTemp2
LastTemp2
shahid khan
Replies
17
Views
315
silencio
silencio
thebuffdon690
Replies
33
Views
451
thebuffdon690
thebuffdon690
mnbvcxz
Replies
1
Views
269
mnbvcxz
mnbvcxz

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top