“You need good bones to leanmax”

[JamesHowlett]

Can anyone honestly show me someone with “no bones” who leaned down and didn’t get more attractive?

 

[Sens]

 

[Deleted member 756]

Me

 

[Sens]

tbh muscle mass increase muscles in face as well, 180 cm 80 kg 10% bf and 180 cm 60kg 10% bf are two different faces

 

[Sens]

Me

u r still very fat

 

[Deleted member 756]

u r still very fat

I am 90 kg at six ft three

 

[Sens]

Me

and yea, u look much more better now, stop shitpost tbh

 

[Deleted member 15099]

Being lean is ideal, bloated gymcels will deny this though.

 

[Constantin Denis]

View attachment 1419905

they lacked muscle too. They do have facial bones

 

[Deleted member 756]

and yea, u look much more better now, stop shitpost tbh

 

[Sens]

they lacked muscle too. They do have facial bones

exactly. Muscles are crusial for face, as well as bones

 

[Sens]

View attachment 1419922

from 3 to 4.5 psl

 

[JamesHowlett]

View attachment 1419905

It’s black and white, they don’t have hair and most likely look better than they would they were fatter. Needs to be comparison of the same person.

 

[Deleted member 14774]

View attachment 1419905

Why do their ears stick out like that

 

[Sens]

Why do their ears stick out like that

Jewish trait. Probably genetic disease, as a result of incest

 

[Lawton88]

Can anyone honestly show me someone with “no bones” who leaned down and didn’t get more attractive?

Wheat Waffles or one of those type channels had a video that showed like 3 different people that it didn't help them at all in the face losing a lot of weight.

Below is an old guy it didn't do much for.

 

[Lorsss]

leanmaxxing is a positive change overall with two small cons:
> if you have a weak frame (wrists, ribcage, clavicles) you may be perceived more skinny by women, this can be avoided through some gymmaxxing

> in certain cases, upper eyelid exposure may get worse, but this can be fixed with fillers, which surprisingly last three years in that area

 

[gamma]

0 difference for face

 

[volcelfatcel]

0 difference for face

View attachment 1420616

if your bones dont pop at high bf even somewhat
then you wont see much of an increase at low bf
if your bones do pop, leanmax will ascend you hard.

 

[Lawton88]

I feel sorry for this guy (couldn't find the before pic) that leaned down that much and for it not to help his face.

 

[JamesHowlett]

Wheat Waffles or one of those type channels had a video that showed like 3 different people that it didn't help them at all in the face losing a lot of weight.

Below is an old guy it didn't do much for.

Not a great example considering how old he is. He does look better leaner though

 

[JamesHowlett]

0 difference for face

View attachment 1420616

There is a difference, like his cheekbones are more defined. Also tilting your head like he is in the left pic makes the jawline more pronounced than it actually is.

 

[JamesHowlett]

I feel sorry for this guy (couldn't find the before pic) that leaned down that much and for it not to help his face.

How do you know it didn’t help his face if there’s no before pic?

 

[BearBoy]

 

[Preoximerianas]

0 difference for face

View attachment 1420616

Absolute god-tier fat distribution genetics.

 

[Lawton88]

I will have to find the video and pictures but there are many examples of guys that gain hardly anything in the face by trimming down to a lean weight and it does hardly anything for their SMV. Its kind of equivalent to those gymcelling examples but you don't have the comical try hard gymcelling appearance affect with it at least.

 

[Deleted member 23558]

tbh muscle mass increase muscles in face as well, 180 cm 80 kg 10% bf and 180 cm 60kg 10% bf are two different faces

No Ramirez looks like a bodybuilder from face alone but his body is that of a crackhead. It’s all bones