You shouldn’t listen to studies when it come to diet

ey88

ey88

Banned
Joined
Jul 8, 2024
Posts
27,262
Reputation
59,484
You should listen to human biology

It makes so much more sense
 
  • Hmm...
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Jova, Niko., imontheloose and 4 others
Idk about that one.

My biology wants kfc everyday
 
  • Woah
Reactions: Jova and StarvedEpi
did u listen to incels on the iternet?
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: R@m@, Jova, alriodai and 3 others
human biology says you should eat cooked meat
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: R@m@, Jova, noodlelover and 2 others
how come you trust human progress when it comes to technology but not when it comes to diet?
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ey88
Jew agents incoming 🚨
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Jova, ey88 and imontheloose
the Jews are not happy with you, I will be informing Mossad

IMG 8672
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova and ey88
we evolved hands and brains to use tools such as fire for tasks like cooking food
we didnt evolve hands to use fire, we evolved them to use tools for hunting
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova and ey88
if i listened to my body id still be an obese fuck because i love eating
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Jova and ey88
human biology says you should eat cooked meat
We actually evolved to be able to eat raw meat

That’s why we have such acidic stomach acid

We have stomach acid with a pH that of a facultative scavenger
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Jova
we didnt evolve hands to use fire, we evolved them to use tools for hunting
while we initially evolved them to use stone tools we couldn't of used fire in the way we did with out that evolution. plus our large brains wouldn't of have been possible with out the extra nutrients we get from cooking
We actually evolved to be able to eat raw meat

That’s why we have such acidic stomach acid

We have stomach acid with a pH that of a facultative scavenger
wrong some bacteria have adapted to survive and can easily make your very sick
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Jova and notsocommonthumb
extra nutrients we get from cooking
You gotta be joking dude

Cooking just makes it easier to get more calories

But it destroys many nutrients
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Jova, NORDEN SLAVORUM, notsocommonthumb and 1 other person
You gotta be joking dude

Cooking just makes it easier to get more calories

But it destroys many nutrients
it makes more nutrients bioavailable and be absorbed during digestion compared to raw meat
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Jova, ey88 and notsocommonthumb
while we initially evolved them to use stone tools we couldn't of used fire in the way we did with out that evolution. plus our large brains wouldn't of have been possible with out the extra nutrients we get from cooking
you believe this despite the vitamins being destroyed during cooking?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22063975/

the whole idea that cooking food allowed us to grow bigger brains is just speculation
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova and ey88
it makes more nutrients bioavailable and be absorbed during digestion compared to raw meat
not true, even some of the fat is lost
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova and ey88
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Jova, ey88 and notsocommonthumb
did i say that some nutrients where not destroyed during cooking? i said they become more bio bioavailable which they do
there are more nutrients being destroyed than there are nutrients that become more bioavailable. protein and some minerals become more bioavailable but thats it
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Jova, StarvedEpi and ey88
High IQ
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: Jova and ey88
did i say that some nutrients where not destroyed during cooking? i said they become more bio bioavailable which they do
inb4 you mention scurvy, raw meat has vitamin c whereas cooked meat doesnt
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: NORDEN SLAVORUM, Jova, StarvedEpi and 2 others
there are more nutrients being destroyed than there are nutrients that become more bioavailable. protein and some minerals become more bioavailable but thats it
protein, fat, B2, iron, zinc, fatty acids and cholesterol where all significantly higher while only b6 and b1 are lower according to an analysis done on south African mutton

1736134581338

inb4 you mention scurvy, raw meat has vitamin c whereas cooked meat doesnt
the amount in muscle meet is negligible and i know you are not eating raw liver and brain. plus you can literally get vitamin c from other sources such as an oranges
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova and ey88
protein, fat, B2, iron, zinc, fatty acids and cholesterol where all significantly higher while only b6 and b1 are lower according to an analysis done on south African mutton

View attachment 3408516

the amount in muscle meet is negligible and i know you are not eating raw liver and brain. plus you can literally get vitamin c from other sources such as an oranges
Can you link the study, I want to see something
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Jova and StarvedEpi
“Table 1. Mean values of the nutrient composition for raw and cooked 100 g meat portion of South African C2 mutton.”

Bro

The only reason they found an “increase” in protein and minerals is because cooking meat makes it lose mass

Water and fat is released

So the minerals that don’t get destroyed will appear as more per 100 g

Maybe I’m missing something, but idk
 
  • +1
Reactions: NORDEN SLAVORUM and Jova
“Table 1. Mean values of the nutrient composition for raw and cooked 100 g meat portion of South African C2 mutton.”

Bro

The only reason they found an “increase” in protein and minerals is because cooking meat makes it lose mass

Water and fat is released

So the minerals that don’t get destroyed will appear as more per 100 g

Maybe I’m missing something, but idk
they would mean 100g before it was cooked like normal, like a Quarter Pounder patty is only a quarter pound before cooking or how they advertise steaks on menus weight as before cooked
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jova
they would mean 100g before it was cooked like normal, like a Quarter Pounder patty is only a quarter pound before cooking or how they advertise steaks on menus weight as before cooked
How do you know though? Does it say that?
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: StarvedEpi
How do you know though? Does it say that?
becuase that's how meat is measured also they said they used the same 100g cuts for both and compared them not comparing 100g cooked meat to 100g raw meat
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ey88
“Table 1. Mean values of the nutrient composition for raw and cooked 100 g meat portion of South African C2 mutton.”

Bro

The only reason they found an “increase” in protein and minerals is because cooking meat makes it lose mass

Water and fat is released

So the minerals that don’t get destroyed will appear as more per 100 g

Maybe I’m missing something, but idk
Yes, goatis showed that exact study to prove raw has more nutrients and this dumbass nigga is posting it :ROFLMAO:
 
Yes, goatis showed that exact study to prove raw has more nutrients and this dumbass nigga is posting it :ROFLMAO:
they said they are comparing the same 100g cuts of meat not comparing 100g cooked meat to 100g raw meat you pea brained retard
 
  • +1
Reactions: ey88
they said they are comparing the same 100g cuts of meat not comparing 100g cooked meat to 100g raw meat you pea brained retard


Watch at 2:30 monkey nigger 🙉
 
  • +1
Reactions: ey88


Watch at 2:30 monkey nigger 🙉

when they say 100g of chicken parts they mean the raw weight you money brained nigger, if they where comparing 100g of cooked meat to a 100g of raw meat they would of said that instead
i want to literally throw acid and burn that fucking dumb psychotic welfare leach dead beat dad grifter like he wanted to happen to his child
 
  • JFL
Reactions: ey88
when they say 100g of chicken parts they mean the raw weight you money brained nigger, if they where comparing 100g of cooked meat to a 100g of raw meat they would of said that instead
i want to literally throw acid and burn that fucking dumb psychotic welfare leach dead beat dad grifter like he wanted to happen to his child
How would protein magically appear from cooking?

I would maybe understand if it’s talking about how much protein is digested but I don’t even think that’s the case

From your study

“Jamora and Rhee (1998) emphasises that cooking lead to moisture loss and thus an
increase in concentration of some nutrient and decrease in heat-labile nutrients”
 
about how much protein is digested but I don’t even think that’s the case
that's literally what they mean
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ey88
“Jamora and Rhee (1998) emphasises that cooking lead to moisture loss and thus an
increase in concentration of some nutrient and decrease in heat-labile nutrients”
Thoughts?
concentration dosent mean increase in nutrients, like you said before the weight/volume of the meat would go down becuase of moisture lost. they also said used the same 100g portions of meat for both
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: ey88

Similar threads

Trisomy 21
Replies
19
Views
170
justloljustlmao
J
BotchedByTaban
Replies
26
Views
183
BotchedByTaban
BotchedByTaban
ey88
Replies
60
Views
578
ey88
ey88
h111
Replies
1
Views
35
h111
h111
ey88
Replies
3
Views
65
ey88
ey88

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top