Troo_
Last troocel standing
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2024
- Posts
- 2,213
- Reputation
- 2,731
I’m just remembering this like hypothetical not from any particular people but like I remember people thinking this way and I always think how it’s the dumbest thing ever
Like if somehow you were frozen and then how ever many years in the future with crazy gene editing and stuff, the below average height is 6’5 for women alone and then like what we would consider cl/sl is the minimum for them
But then you’re still just you. Ltn-low mtn and give or take 5’10. Not sure why but people think you’d have sexual attraction rather than being a circus attraction.
Anyway.
You would not have sexual attraction if the avg height and face increased massively
Like if somehow you were frozen and then how ever many years in the future with crazy gene editing and stuff, the below average height is 6’5 for women alone and then like what we would consider cl/sl is the minimum for them
But then you’re still just you. Ltn-low mtn and give or take 5’10. Not sure why but people think you’d have sexual attraction rather than being a circus attraction.
Anyway.
You would not have sexual attraction if the avg height and face increased massively
