Your daily reminder that race doesn't exist

[TheStonerOne]

When we talk about continental or regional variation between humans, that is within the context of a small 0.5% difference at BEST. Humans are more like 99.8% similar on average. This means we're less diverse than:

Dog breeds
Chimpanzees
Gorillas
Orangutans

Differences in morphology aren't enough to create subspecies or even breeds. Genetic variation in humans is clinal but doesn't amount to speciation.

But for what it's worth, even if one could entertain the concept of "race" for a second, it still wouldn't promote what those who call themselves "white supremacists" promote.

If you promote "race" you have to be consistent. You can't arbitrarily consider certain humans from the malleable borders of one part of the smallest part of Eurasia to be part of a "race" to the exclusion of others. That's stupid. You can't believe that arbitrary/artificial boundaries between the Bosphorus and Thrace create things that don't exist.

But it never was about truth. It was about ideology. EVEN when we entertain the concept of "race" it STILL doesn't promote what so-called "white supremacists" argue.

 

[offtogandyheaven]

DNR stfu with this shit

 

[John6Enjoyer]

When we talk about continental or regional variation between humans, that is within the context of a small 0.5% difference at BEST. Humans are more like 99.8% similar on average. This means we're less diverse than:

Dog breeds
Chimpanzees
Gorillas
Orangutans

Differences in morphology aren't enough to create subspecies or even breeds. Genetic variation in humans is clinal but doesn't amount to speciation.

But for what it's worth, even if one could entertain the concept of "race" for a second, it still wouldn't promote what those who call themselves "white supremacists" promote.

If you promote "race" you have to be consistent. You can't arbitrarily consider certain humans from the malleable borders of one part of the smallest part of Eurasia to be part of a "race" to the exclusion of others. That's stupid. You can't believe that arbitrary/artificial boundaries between the Bosphorus and Thrace create things that don't exist.

But it never was about truth. It was about ideology. EVEN when we entertain the concept of "race" it STILL doesn't promote what so-called "white supremacists" argue.

Well race does exist per evolutionary psychology

But I agree, the things we attach to it aren't as real/concrete as we even purport it to be

 

[John6Enjoyer]

DNR stfu with this shit

When they greey speaks u consume their soul

 

[TheStonerOne]

Well race does exist per evolutionary psychology

But I agree, the things we attach to it aren't as real/concrete as we even purport it to be

What do you mean by that good sir?

 

[EvilSatanArseRapist]

it never was about truth. It was about ideology

You bringing up the whole genetic difference thing together with the topic is deliberate framing to convey a falsehood.

Subspecies aren't determined just by genetical semblance.

Subspecies =

>consistent phenotypic difference (morphology and behavioural),

>occupying a distinct geographic range,

>being able to interbreed with individuals of the same species,
=> so obviously no speciation between so called different "races" of homo sapiens

Basically a subspecies is a recognizable regional form of the same species.
I do not hate anyone based on this, but denying it is (unless you are retarded) usually done disingenuously and in bad faith.

 

[NatureRapist]

We are 70% genetically similar to a banana

 

[TheStonerOne]

We are 70% genetically similar to a banana

Humans aren't bananas.

 

[TheStonerOne]

You bringing up the whole genetic difference thing together with the topic is deliberate framing to convey a falsehood.

Subspecies aren't determined just by genetical semblance.

Subspecies =

>consistent phenotypic difference (morphology and behavioural),

>occupying a distinct geographic range,

>being able to interbreed with individuals of the same species,
=> so obviously no speciation between so called different "races" of homo sapiens

Basically a subspecies is a recognizable regional form of the same species.
I do not hate anyone based on this, but denying it is (unless you are retarded) usually done disingenuously and in bad faith.

That would be true if Neanderthals still existed. But they are dead. There aren't extant subspecies of humans.

 

[Bryce]

Humans aren't bananas.

Trvthnvke

 

[NatureRapist]

Humans aren't bananas.

And therefore whites aren't the same race as blacks , if 70% isnt enough for you

 

[Kiril Velev]

daily cope

 

[EvilSatanArseRapist]

That would be true if Neanderthals still existed. But they are dead. There aren't extant subspecies of humans.

The ethnicity so subhuman they went EXTINCT.(First actually high effort thread, ANTHROPOLOGY-cels gtfinh)

The ethnic group of people i will be covering are the now extinct aboriginals of tasmania known as tasmanids: They did not develop agriculture so their diet consisted of meat, mostly from hunted marsupials and birds some plant foods like ferns, roots, berries, seeds and nuts coastal...

looksmax.org

so you are saying the aboriginals of tasmania are a subspecies just because they went extinct?

 

[shngstaaaa107]

And therefore whites aren't the same race as blacks , if 70% isnt enough for you

Me when I can't read

 

[TheStonerOne]

And therefore whites aren't the same race as blacks , if 70% isnt enough for you

At most "whites" (which is ill-defined and could mean anything from Northern Europe to Tajikistan) and "blacks" (there's more genetic diversity between two random West Africans than between the whole of Western Eurasia) differ by 0.5%. If this is constitutes as "race" I'm disappointed in you.

 

[NatureRapist]

At most "whites" (which is ill-defined and could mean anything from Northern Europe to Tajikistan) and "blacks" (there's more genetic diversity between two random West Africans than between the whole of Western Eurasia) differ by 0.5%. If this is constitutes as "race" I'm disappointed in you.

Nobody considers tajiks white. They are known as the niggers of russia along with the other central asian countries

 

[EvilSatanArseRapist]

At most "whites" (which is ill-defined and could mean anything from Northern Europe to Tajikistan) and "blacks" (there's more genetic diversity between two random West Africans than between the whole of Western Eurasia) differ by 0.5%. If this is constitutes as "race" I'm disappointed in you.

The facts you present are true, the conclusion is, for the lack of a better word, kinda fallacious tho.

You bringing up the whole genetic difference thing together with the topic is deliberate framing to convey a falsehood.

Subspecies aren't determined just by genetical semblance.

Subspecies =

>consistent phenotypic difference (morphology and behavioural),

>occupying a distinct geographic range,

>being able to interbreed with individuals of the same species,
=> so obviously no speciation between so called different "races" of homo sapiens

Basically a subspecies is a recognizable regional form of the same species.
I do not hate anyone based on this, but denying it is (unless you are retarded) usually done disingenuously and in bad faith.

atleast rep me nigga.

i kinda agree on one thing, race might not be the best term for it, but how ever you define it or call it, the truth won't change.

 

[TheStonerOne]

Nobody considers tajiks white. They are known as the niggers of russia along with the other central asian countries

Nobody cares what you think. Tajiks are Central Asians and Central Asians overlap with Europeans/Middle Easterners. They tend to have white skin and those are from the SAME genes as those in Northern Europeans. So distinctions between them and Northern Europeans become arbitrary if speaking in a global context.

 

[NatureRapist]

Nobody cares what you think. Tajiks are Central Asians and Central Asians overlap with Europeans/Middle Easterners. They tend to have white skin and those are from the SAME genes as those in Northern Europeans. So distinctions between them and Northern Europeans become arbitrary if speaking in a global context.

Damn I guess blacks really are white @LooksmaxxMyAss

 

[slaters]

When we talk about continental or regional variation between humans, that is within the context of a small 0.5% difference at BEST. Humans are more like 99.8% similar on average. This means we're less diverse than:

Dog breeds
Chimpanzees
Gorillas
Orangutans

Differences in morphology aren't enough to create subspecies or even breeds. Genetic variation in humans is clinal but doesn't amount to speciation.

But for what it's worth, even if one could entertain the concept of "race" for a second, it still wouldn't promote what those who call themselves "white supremacists" promote.

If you promote "race" you have to be consistent. You can't arbitrarily consider certain humans from the malleable borders of one part of the smallest part of Eurasia to be part of a "race" to the exclusion of others. That's stupid. You can't believe that arbitrary/artificial boundaries between the Bosphorus and Thrace create things that don't exist.

But it never was about truth. It was about ideology. EVEN when we entertain the concept of "race" it STILL doesn't promote what so-called "white supremacists" argue.

I see it with my eyes

 

[LooksmaxxMyAss]

Damn I guess blacks really are white @LooksmaxxMyAss

I was right. They're aryan af

 

[TheStonerOne]

Damn I guess blacks really are white @LooksmaxxMyAss

If you want to follow the (small) minority opinion (and it is a WRONG opinion) regarding "race" then none of them differed that ALL Western Eurasians (not just the pink ones west of the Ural Mountains), certain Central Asians, certain South Asians, North Africans and Somalis/Cushitic Ethiopians and Eritreans/Semitic Eritreans constitute a "race". So you don't believe in "race" at all.

 

[buddhistking]

Tell that to this man

 

[John6Enjoyer]

What do you mean by that good sir?

U didn't rep me back so it's concealed forever now