Zygoma-mandible angle, unknown facial ratio (gtfih implantcells)

[hej1377]

If youve been walking around with a very strong urge to find a new niche facial ratio to be insecure about make sure to read this.

Tl;dr the angle from your far out cheekbone to jaw is important to mog

This is kind of a low effort post as i dont feel like spending hours in this shot nor does it have a ton of information on it.

Ive noticed this first when ive seen a bunch of those clavicular post-surgery morphs on tiktok in which the zygo implants is something the ai seems to focus on, only some of the ones tho included the planned downgraft of the face but even tho the zygos seems to have remained similar, the ones that included the downgraft looked way better to me,

i saw that when the gonion and outer zygoma was further away it looked way better and not uncanny or overly striking as the implant on its own seems to cause strikingness which is good but the exacterbaterbation caused by the differing relationship made it just look overdone and too much. I would atleast hypothesise that this may be a large part of why zygo implants are notoriously uncanny and and treated with caution here as they give inconsistent results

I looked it up and searched things like "gonion to zyomatic angle" and simar things untill i searched "zygoma mandible angle" (ZMA). Then i found this study, it talked about the angle i was thinking about and it did find a pretty strong statistical correlation between attractivness and a good zma angle, 101 people rated,couldve been more but still decent and they rated 120 pictures based on what they considered as attractive and model like. They found that a zygoma-mandible angle of 171,8 was the best and is considered ideal for this measurement.

How you measure it is by finding the furtest out point on your zygo and the same with your gonion and then do like a circle clockwise from the cheekbone to the gonion

This is the pic used in the study and the blue kind of parable is the zygoma to mandible angle

So if youre looking into zygo implants and youre worried about looking uncanny or just wanna look good this might be somehing to take into account when getting he implant designed

I havent found any other similar studies so this seems to be kind of new as this was only a 2024 study. Im gonna look out for more studies on this in the future to see if my theory is correct on a societal level when theres more to support it or contradict it

If anyone knows more about this its definitely giant, so @RealSurgerymax or @lurking truecel so what are your thoughts?

 

[Monicaa]

good post

 

[slaters]

Is this not just bi zygo

 

[hej1377]

Is this not just bi zygo

No that simply compares width in isolation and doesnt take into account facial height when facial height seems to play a part in bz-bg harmony

 

[slaters]

No that simply compares width in isolation and doesnt take into account facial height when facial height seems to play a part in bz-bg harmony

Ohh I get what you mean pretty sure most people that surgerymax properly already take this into account with other ratios
Still an interesting post tho

 

[hej1377]

Ohh I get what you mean pretty sure most people that surgerymax properly already take this into account with other ratios
Still an interesting post tho

No its that they dont take this into account but they should to get optimal results

 

[Sadist]

cute seeing org users finally catching onto the importance of the condylar process

 

[hej1377]

cute seeing org users finally catching onto the importance of the condylar process

Yeah ive just heard the term but never paid any real attention to it as i havent seen the utility

 

[Sadist]

Yeah ive just heard the term but never paid any real attention to it as i havent seen the utility

very important for assessing angularity

 

[hej1377]

Bump