Zygoma-mandible angle, unknown facial ratio (gtfih implantcells)

hej1377

hej1377

Chad-affirming care is a right, not a privilege
Joined
Oct 14, 2024
Posts
7,403
Reputation
7,756
If youve been walking around with a very strong urge to find a new niche facial ratio to be insecure about make sure to read this.

Tl;dr the angle from your far out cheekbone to jaw is important to mog

This is kind of a low effort post as i dont feel like spending hours in this shot nor does it have a ton of information on it.

Ive noticed this first when ive seen a bunch of those clavicular post-surgery morphs on tiktok in which the zygo implants is something the ai seems to focus on, only some of the ones tho included the planned downgraft of the face but even tho the zygos seems to have remained similar, the ones that included the downgraft looked way better to me,

i saw that when the gonion and outer zygoma was further away it looked way better and not uncanny or overly striking as the implant on its own seems to cause strikingness which is good but the exacterbaterbation caused by the differing relationship made it just look overdone and too much. I would atleast hypothesise that this may be a large part of why zygo implants are notoriously uncanny and and treated with caution here as they give inconsistent results

I looked it up and searched things like "gonion to zyomatic angle" and simar things untill i searched "zygoma mandible angle" (ZMA). Then i found this study, it talked about the angle i was thinking about and it did find a pretty strong statistical correlation between attractivness and a good zma angle, 101 people rated,couldve been more but still decent and they rated 120 pictures based on what they considered as attractive and model like. They found that a zygoma-mandible angle of 171,8 was the best and is considered ideal for this measurement.

How you measure it is by finding the furtest out point on your zygo and the same with your gonion and then do like a circle clockwise from the cheekbone to the gonion
266 2024 4022 Fig1 HTML

This is the pic used in the study and the blue kind of parable is the zygoma to mandible angle

So if youre looking into zygo implants and youre worried about looking uncanny or just wanna look good this might be somehing to take into account when getting he implant designed

I havent found any other similar studies so this seems to be kind of new as this was only a 2024 study. Im gonna look out for more studies on this in the future to see if my theory is correct on a societal level when theres more to support it or contradict it

If anyone knows more about this its definitely giant, so @RealSurgerymax or @lurking truecel so what are your thoughts?
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: 3pider, Histy, devonhendryx999 and 7 others
good post
 
  • +1
Reactions: hej1377
Is this not just bi zygo
 
  • +1
Reactions: hej1377
Is this not just bi zygo
No that simply compares width in isolation and doesnt take into account facial height when facial height seems to play a part in bz-bg harmony
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tensor and slaters
No that simply compares width in isolation and doesnt take into account facial height when facial height seems to play a part in bz-bg harmony
Ohh I get what you mean pretty sure most people that surgerymax properly already take this into account with other ratios
Still an interesting post tho
 
  • +1
Reactions: hej1377
Ohh I get what you mean pretty sure most people that surgerymax properly already take this into account with other ratios
Still an interesting post tho
No its that they dont take this into account but they should to get optimal results
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tensor and slaters
cute seeing org users finally catching onto the importance of the condylar process:feelshmm:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Histy and hej1377
cute seeing org users finally catching onto the importance of the condylar process:feelshmm:
Yeah ive just heard the term but never paid any real attention to it as i havent seen the utility
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tensor and Sadist
Yeah ive just heard the term but never paid any real attention to it as i havent seen the utility
very important for assessing angularity
 
  • +1
Reactions: hej1377
Bump
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tensor
W post
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tensor and hej1377
Good thread:feelsyay:
But I think maybe a measurement that measures "the height of the cheekbone relative to the gonion" as an additional measurements for percieved facial length would be good. If we were to have this and bigonial by bizygomatic the measurement you introduced would pretty much come with it
 
  • +1
Reactions: Histy and hej1377
Good Thread 👏🏻 :Comfy:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Tensor and hej1377

Similar threads

hej1377
Replies
34
Views
393
whodoievenbelieve
whodoievenbelieve
hej1377
Replies
9
Views
95
childishkillah
childishkillah
monecel
Replies
17
Views
1K
PrinceofDarkness
PrinceofDarkness
monecel
Replies
39
Views
2K
brainregeneration
brainregeneration

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top