Eriot Lodger
Still lodgin'
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2024
- Posts
- 1,379
- Reputation
- 2,074
It's obvious that Jews needs to "occupy" their adversaries based on this poll given that most people seem to wanna gas them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
No I stand against israel on alot things but I disagree on that israel is apartheid, ethnostate, theocrazy and commiting genocideAre u Israeli?
They killed 50k peopleNo I stand against israel on alot things but I disagree on that israel is apartheid, ethnostate, theocrazy and commiting genocide
Depends if you mean actual hatred or hatred to push an agenda (AoR)Thoughts?
What a clownNo I stand against israel on alot things but I disagree on that israel is apartheid, ethnostate, theocrazy and commiting genocide
shalomThoughts?
Did this start on the 7th of October? Hamas actually made a mistake with their lack of action,Meh I don’t feel bad for anyone anymore. Like nobody feels bad for me for being a 28 year old khhv so why should I sympathize with such people? And of course hamas are terrorists. They mass-killed innocent civilians which started this war.
Yeah.Did this start on the 7th of October? Hamas actually made a mistake with their lack of action,
Christians don’t view them as “competitors” only Muslims have such a stupid view. We see them as lost fools, idiots who reject the truth and are still stuck in the old days where god favours only them.Great people, oldest still standing monotheistic group in the world, Christian’s and Muslims should see them more like older cousins instead of competitors (I am Muslim)
I love "democracy" and "western values" and "personal freedom" what Israel and USA are allegedly based onIt's obvious that Jews needs to "occupy" their adversaries based on this poll given that most people seem to wanna gas them.
I would much prefer an Israel to exist over a Palestine. Jews are in actuality not at all a threat or concern for Christendom, however the same can’t be true for 1.9 billion slobbering Islamic brutes with an average IQ of 60-75.
Jews have also contributed significantly to many domains. I like them.
They killed 30 to 40 and alot of them are hamas and if you compare it to real a genocide with worse weapons and bigger area like rwanda and a shorter time frame so rwanda around 500 kThey killed 50k people
No why should i hate them we are All the sameThoughts?
yeah Jews are the silent threat Muslims are open about itI would much prefer an Israel to exist over a Palestine. Jews are in actuality not at all a threat or concern for Christendom, however the same can’t be true for 1.9 billion slobbering Islamic brutes with an average IQ of 60-75.
Jews have also contributed significantly to many domains. I like them.
lol, murtaddYeah.
Talking about yourself?lol, murtadd
The Old Testament is far more violent and sociopathic than the Qu'ran. Yahweh is just straight up evil, which makes sense given that he's literally just a Canaanite war/storm deity akin to Zeus that was repurposed for monotheism.yeah Jews are the silent threat Muslims are open about it
Islam is worse of course because of their shitty violent book but Jews ain't too far behind either
What's wrong with "kill until there is no discourse in this world, and the religion is for Allah"? Liberal cuckyeah Jews are the silent threat Muslims are open about it
Islam is worse of course because of their shitty violent book but Jews ain't too far behind either
You Wahabbi's and wignats are cut from the same cloth istg. Atomwaffen Division = pasty ISIS.What's wrong with "kill until there is no discourse in this world, and the religion is for Allah"? Liberal cuck
This is ridiculous lie. Average IQ in the Arab/Muslim is around the low-to-mid-80's, which is exactly what you'd expect from countries at that level of economic development. This is about where the average British man was in the 1950's.yeah Jews are the silent threat Muslims are open about it
Islam is worse of course because of their shitty violent book but Jews ain't too far behind either
Nice pfpI'm anti-Zionist but I also have a Jewish gf (who's also anti-Zionist). I guess 'I don't care' was the best response.
Do you have the studies for this?This is ridiculous lie. Average IQ in the Arab/Muslim is around the low-to-mid-80's, which is exactly what you'd expect from countries at that level of economic development. This is about where the average British man was in the 1950's.
look up flynn effectDo you have the studies for this?
This study contains some data on average IQ in Arab nations:Do you have the studies for this?
I hate them with perfect hate as my father hated Esau before he was even born.Thoughts?
Thanks, I've never seen a purer soyface. Every once in a while someone is retarded enough to think it's actually me.Nice pfp
This study contains some data on average IQ in Arab nations:
I had a harder time finding the data for the claim I made about British IQ, since it was something I read about years ago, but this study does demonstrate significant IQ gains in Great Britain during the mid 20th century (4-10 points based on the age group on the Raven's Test):
Tbh, it's a crude theory. One that doesn't take into account all of the complicating factors that affect IQ's of populations (such as socio-economic development, recent historical circumstances, and even ecological factors pertaining to the rate of infectious diseases (when combined with extreme poverty and economic underdevelopment makes these particular diseases take a more drastic toll on the cognitive development of the young children who tend to contract them. And I think the white supremacist/'race realist'/alt-right perspective gets wrong is the causal relationship between national poverty and IQ; i.e. poor and underdeveloped nations are the way they are because they have low IQ's, when in reality, it's far more likely to be the other way around: people in these countries have a lower average IQ BECAUSE they are poorer and underdeveloped. and this is largely a matter of historical circumstance. The white supremacist/alt-right narrative is only willing to look at the past 500 years of history, where Western Europe has emerged as the dominant civilization. However, the Renaissance could have never happened without the Islamic Golden Age; with many renaissance scholars citing Arabic names in their treatises. The Islamic civilization of the middle brought Greek philosophy BACK to Europe, texts swhich were largely forgotten in Europe for hundreds of years. They also made incredible scientific advancements: they were the first to discover the Andromeda galaxy, developed advance theories of disease and literally inventing hospitals, founded the first university in Egypt, and unparalleled intellectual culture that hadn't been seen since the Ancient Greeks. Alll great civilizations experience ascent and decay, and the idea that Western civilization is the greatest because we achieved technological and political dominance in le current year is just ridiculously silly. The West is in decline; we're a few decades past its apex, and another civilization will take its place as hegemony as has always happened before. There's a strong likelihood that Muslim civilization didn't achieve global dominance the way the West did was because of the Mongols sacking Baghdad, the center of knowledge and high culture of the middle-age Islamic civilization. History is the domain of chaos.Interesting: My theory was groups of people with an average of 70 and below are complete savages (no electricity, plumbing, living in huts, half naked, hunter gatherers, etc). Groups of people with an IQ range of 70-85 are third world shitholes, 85-90 range to be have some academic advancements, decent architecture and slightly higher quality of life, 95-105 first world nations, 107+ and the addition of high levels of creativity = greatest civilizations or nations in history.
It's tough to rate the Caucasians IQ since virtually all the nations (due to the Edomites) have been race mixed to oblivion. Germans during the time of Hitler's dictatorship had an average a 107 IQ and in some cities 114+ IQ's. Combine that with their high levels of creativity and national pride, this turned them into an incredible superpower within about a decade. It's too bad the parasites convinced the Americans to join the war.
Tbh, it's a crude theory. One that doesn't take into account all of the complicating factors that affect IQ's of populations (such as socio-economic development, recent historical circumstances, and even ecological factors pertaining to the rate of infectious diseases (when combined with extreme poverty and economic underdevelopment makes these particular diseases take a more drastic toll on the cognitive development of the young children who tend to contract them. And I think the white supremacist/'race realist'/alt-right perspective gets wrong is the causal relationship between national poverty and IQ; i.e. poor and underdeveloped nations are the way they are because they have low IQ's, when in reality, it's far more likely to be the other way around: people in these countries have a lower average IQ BECAUSE they are poorer and underdeveloped. and this is largely a matter of historical circumstance. The white supremacist/alt-right narrative is only willing to look at the past 500 years of history, where Western Europe has emerged as the dominant civilization. However, the Renaissance could have never happened without the Islamic Golden Age; with many renaissance scholars citing Arabic names in their treatises. The Islamic civilization of the middle brought Greek philosophy BACK to Europe, texts swhich were largely forgotten in Europe for hundreds of years. They also made incredible scientific advancements: they were the first to discover the Andromeda galaxy, developed advance theories of disease and literally inventing hospitals, founded the first university in Egypt, and unparalleled intellectual culture that hadn't been seen since the Ancient Greeks. Alll great civilizations experience ascent and decay, and the idea that Western civilization is the greatest because we achieved technological and political dominance in le current year is just ridiculously silly. The West is in decline; we're a few decades past its apex, and another civilization will take its place as hegemony as has always happened before. There's a strong likelihood that Muslim civilization didn't achieve global dominance the way the West did was because of the Mongols sacking Baghdad, the center of knowledge and high culture of the middle-age Islamic civilization. History is the domain of chaos.Interesting: My theory was groups of people with an average of 70 and below are complete savages (no electricity, plumbing, living in huts, half naked, hunter gatherers, etc). Groups of people with an IQ range of 70-85 are third world shitholes, 85-90 range to be have some academic advancements, decent architecture and slightly higher quality of life, 95-105 first world nations, 107+ and the addition of high levels of creativity = greatest civilizations or nations in history.
It's tough to rate the Caucasians IQ since virtually all the nations (due to the Edomites) have been race mixed to oblivion. Germans during the time of Hitler's dictatorship had an average a 107 IQ and in some cities 114+ IQ's. Combine that with their high levels of creativity and national pride, this turned them into an incredible superpower within about a decade. It's too bad the parasites convinced the Americans to join the war.
Thank you for your research to find these studies.Tbh, it's a crude theory. One that doesn't take into account all of the complicating factors that affect IQ's of populations (such as socio-economic development, recent historical circumstances, and even ecological factors pertaining to the rate of infectious diseases (when combined with extreme poverty and economic underdevelopment makes these particular diseases take a more drastic toll on the cognitive development of the young children who tend to contract them. And I think the white supremacist/'race realist'/alt-right perspective gets wrong is the causal relationship between national poverty and IQ; i.e. poor and underdeveloped nations are the way they are because they have low IQ's, when in reality, it's far more likely to be the other way around: people in these countries have a lower average IQ BECAUSE they are poorer and underdeveloped. and this is largely a matter of historical circumstance. The white supremacist/alt-right narrative is only willing to look at the past 500 years of history, where Western Europe has emerged as the dominant civilization. However, the Renaissance could have never happened without the Islamic Golden Age; with many renaissance scholars citing Arabic names in their treatises. The Islamic civilization of the middle brought Greek philosophy BACK to Europe, texts swhich were largely forgotten in Europe for hundreds of years. They also made incredible scientific advancements: they were the first to discover the Andromeda galaxy, developed advance theories of disease and literally inventing hospitals, founded the first university in Egypt, and unparalleled intellectual culture that hadn't been seen since the Ancient Greeks. Alll great civilizations experience ascent and decay, and the idea that Western civilization is the greatest because we achieved technological and political dominance in le current year is just ridiculously silly. The West is in decline; we're a few decades past its apex, and another civilization will take its place as hegemony as has always happened before. There's a strong likelihood that Muslim civilization didn't achieve global dominance the way the West did was because of the Mongols sacking Baghdad, the center of knowledge and high culture of the middle-age Islamic civilization. History is the domain of chaos.
Here's an exremely well-cited and well-argued article on the issue of IQ in Sub-Saharan Africa (and other tropical nations) that took me fucking forever to find because the original website is defunct: