Is India or Pakistan more subhuman

northern mogger

northern mogger

Look down on earth and see the seeds you have sown
Joined
Nov 20, 2023
Posts
6,911
Reputation
7,506
Lets keep it civil.
@Michael Myers @Lynxress @RAMU KAKA @BrahminBoss
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: 4ever, RAMU KAKA and Lynxress
 88773535 gettyimages 3082378 1
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: starvecell, ominion, murdah and 5 others
Bangladesh is worse then both
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deprived, ominion, yen and 7 others
It's even, nuke them both.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ominion, Aero and northern mogger
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Diarrhoea, northern mogger and SecularIslamist
Bangladesh is worse then both
Bengalis have better facial features. Jaws and eyes in particular.Don't have hook noses either. We are shorter, browner (except dravidians) and have less political and cultural halo than both. That's why we are considered more subhuman SMV wise.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: JohnDoe, Diarrhoea, ominion and 3 others
Bangladesh is worse then both
Not even close, far from it. Anybody who believes this is probably a coping dindu/paki or a troll:feelskek:

Objectively we are better off than both because we don't even have the typical pajeet phenotypes as often as they do because of 15-25% Tibetan/Burmese blood. It's just a simple genetic fact, cherrypicking won't do shit when our fundamental genome is different.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: RAMU KAKA, Diarrhoea, yeeyeeslayer and 1 other person
@ggg.tv @Michael Myers you seeing this? going to let this slide?
 
They all look the same to normies
 
  • +1
Reactions: ominion, KIVVV and northern mogger
Bengalis have better facial features. Jaws and eyes in particular.Don't have hook noses either. We are shorter, browner (except dravidians) and have less political and cultural halo than both. That's why we are considered more subhuman SMV wise.
You literally make shit up all the time because you're subhuman and you want us all to be subhuman like you. We're completely average, it's just you subhuman Sylhetis that are shorter than average.

Nope, Bengalis are definitely lighter than most Indian groups until you get to Punjab or Kashmir, especially the fucking Biharis and Uttar Pradesh and whatever people:feelskek:

Uttar Pradesh btw
1714854127699
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deprived, RAMU KAKA, rand anon and 2 others
if you put a sri lankan, pakistani, and a bengali in the same room, a normie would think theyre all indian.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: RAMU KAKA, Razeb, rand anon and 6 others
You literally make shit up all the time because you're subhuman and you want us all to be subhuman like you. Nope, Bengalis are definitely lighter than most Indian groups until you get to Punjab or Kashmir, especially the fucking Biharis and Uttar Pradesh and whatever people:feelskek:
@SecularIslamist you seeing this chief?
 
Not even close, far from it. Anybody who believes this is probably a coping dindu/paki or a troll:feelskek:

Objectively we are better off than both because we don't even have the typical pajeet phenotypes as often as they do because of 15-25% Tibetan/Burmese blood.
Ive never seen someone from Bangladesh who doesn't look almost black
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Diarrhoea, Razeb and northern mogger
Ive never seen someone from Bangladesh who doesn't look almost black
lmao what. The only people who are straight up black are people of a migrant/tribal background who are overrepresented on image sites because people love their poverty porn. Native Banglas look like this.
1714854246559


They are definitely lighter than Indian students, many of whom are literally "le high caste Brahmins" and shit
1714854367897


So that's not even true and easily disprovable:feelskek:
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: RAMU KAKA, ggg.tv🤫 and northern mogger
@Michael Myers say something!
 
  • WTF
Reactions: Michael Myers
@SecularIslamist you seeing this chief?
I have that mfer bongojeet on ignore. Thanks.

You literally make shit up all the time because you're subhuman and you want us all to be subhuman like you. We're completely average, it's just you subhuman Sylhetis that are shorter than average.

Nope, Bengalis are definitely lighter than most Indian groups until you get to Punjab or Kashmir, especially the fucking Biharis and Uttar Pradesh and whatever people:feelskek:

Uttar Pradesh btw
View attachment 2898120
Stfu you've probably never been. Wtf do you know? I'm speaking about Bangladesh as a WHOLE. They are shorter and darker (except dravidians) as I said. Wtf does one pic from Uttar Pradesh prove you cuck?

Sylethis mog other parts of the country anyway because we haven't don't have too much chink genes so much so that it fucks up facial features and we look feminine.
 
  • Woah
Reactions: northern mogger
I have that mfer bongojeet on ignore. Thanks.


Stfu you've probably never been. Wtf do you know? I'm speaking about Bangladesh as a WHOLE. They are shorter and darker (except dravidians) as I said. Wtf does one pic from Uttar Pradesh prove you cuck?

Sylethis mog other parts of the country anyway because we haven't don't have too much chink genes so much so that it fucks up facial features and we look feminine.
Sylhetis are subhuman and short, don't go around projecting on to everybody, you inferior dog. Banglas in Canada who grew up here are easily 5'8-5'9 on average

Also, I have more than one pic, Uttar Pradeshis are definitely significantly darker than Banglas. Indians are Dravidians by your logic then because they are not South Indian but still darker:feelskek:

Here's another one form Uttar Pradesh lol
1714854605809
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: RAMU KAKA, Michael Myers and northern mogger
Sylhetis are subhuman and short, don't go around projecting on to everybody, you inferior dog. Banglas in Canada who grew up here are easily 5'8-5'9 on average

Also, I have more than one pic, Uttar Pradeshis are definitely significantly darker than Banglas. Indians are Dravidians by your logic then because they are not South Indian but still darker:feelskek:
View attachment 2898141
@SecularIslamist i will keep tagging you for this fight
 
@SecularIslamist i will keep tagging you for this fight
He's already seen it and it's not even a fight so you can stop the whole instigating, I'm just posting the facts with pictures as proof:feelskek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: Michael Myers and northern mogger
It’s a very silly argument regardless of who’s actually better or not because everyone else in the world sees them as the same.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SecularIslamist and northern mogger
Sylhetis are subhuman and short, don't go around projecting on to everybody, you inferior dog.
Sylethis mog people from Chittagong in the East and Indian lookalikes from the West. You live in Canada. I live in UK which has highest diaspora of Bengalis. There are overlaps between them all anyway - if I see any Bengali from other parts of Bangladesh they look gooky to varying degrees that's all.

Also, how fucking autistic do you have to be to distinguish height of Sylethis from other parts of the country? Bangladesh is one of the shortest countries in the entire fucking world - bar Bolivia, Indonesia, East Timor and some other SEA countries. Just stfu 🤫
Also, I have more than one pic, Uttar Pradeshis are definitely significantly darker than Banglas. Indians are Dravidians by your logic then:feelskek:
I said excluding dravidians you retards. Why are you taking one example as representative of the entire country.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: northern mogger
It’s a very silly argument regardless of who’s actually better or not because everyone else in the world sees them as the same.
We needed a fight for entertainment
 
  • JFL
Reactions: SecularIslamist
even
 
  • +1
Reactions: northern mogger
It’s a very silly argument regardless of who’s actually better or not because everyone else in the world sees them as the same.
Exactly this. Same applies to MENA. But you have low IQ dogs here argue for differences within countries as well rather than between.
 
  • +1
Reactions: northern mogger
Sylethis mog people from Chittagong in the East and Indian lookalikes from the West. You live in Canada. I live in UK which has highest diaspora of Bengalis. There are overlaps between them all anyway - if I see any Bengali from other parts of Bangladesh they look gooky to varying degrees that's all.

Also, how fucking autistic do you have to be to distinguish height of Sylethis from other parts of the country? Bangladesh is one of the shortest countries in the entire fucking world - bar Bolivia, Indonesia, East Timor and some other SEA countries. Just stfu 🤫

I said excluding dravidians you retards. Why are you taking one example as representative of the entire country.
90% of England's Bangladeshis are literally Sylheti, don't talk back when it's all just from your group of subhumans. You useless fucks are short and ugly not us:lul:

Also, not really lol Bangladeshis with proper nutrition are taller than many groups. Sylhetis are just short because of their inferior genepool. We are average in South Asia too and taller than many places in India and ofc Nepal and shit so you're bullshitting

Also, Uttar Pradesh isn't Dravidian, it's an Indo-Aryan state that is not part of South India even. You got proven wrong with facts because you said everybody but Dravidians were lighter when even the Central Indian states like UP Bihar and shit like that are darker than us even though they have more steppe and shit:feelskek:
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Michael Myers and northern mogger
He's already seen it and it's not even a fight so you can stop the whole instigating, I'm just posting the facts with pictures as proof:feelskek:
When were cherry picked pics proof. Bring stats or show a walking tour of a GENERAL place.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: northern mogger
90% of England's Bangladeshis are literally Sylheti, don't talk back when it's all just from your group of subhumans. You useless fucks are short and ugly not us:lul:
Bengalis in the UK mog the ones back home idk wtf you're talking about.
Also, not really lol Bangladeshis with proper nutrition are taller than many groups. Sylhetis are just short because of their inferior genepool. We are average in South Asia too and taller than many places in India and ofc Nepal and shit so you're bullshitting
You dumb fucking retard here are some fucking STATISTICS of 19 YEAR OLDS in 2020- sorted by shortest males in the world!!

Screenshot 20240504 213759


Height of Indians - but looks at West Bengal (where likely your cousins are)

1714855333579


Also, Uttar Pradesh isn't Dravidian, it's an Indo-Aryan state that is not part of South India even. You got proven wrong with facts because you said everybody but Dravidians were lighter when even the Central Indian states like UP Bihar and shit like that are darker than us even though they have more steppe and shit:feelskek:
One fucking nation / state out of 30+ prove disproves my point stfu :soy::soy::soy:

That's equivalent of me picking out Punjab's and saying they're lighter than pakis on average. Like I said, just STFU
 
  • Hmm...
  • Love it
Reactions: Michael Myers and northern mogger
When were cherry picked pics proof. Bring stats or show a walking tour of a GENERAL place.
That is a picture of a general place you retard it's a whole bunch of regular people walking in some shopping district in Uttar Pradesh, they're just the average people there and they're darker:feelskek:

You can't cherrypick proper crowd pictures if they represent the average people out on the streets that's the opposite of cherrypicking outliers and shit:feelsgah:

I've already posted the students comparison between Bangla students from Rajshahi and Indian students from some university and the Bangla students were also lighter
Bangla students
1714855429593


Indians
1714855447483


Indian students are still darker:lul:
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: Michael Myers, northern mogger and SecularIslamist
Exactly this. Same applies to MENA. But you have low IQ dogs here argue for differences within countries as well rather than between.
I am the forum curry in denial according to gengar for saying this in like December.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: northern mogger
Bengalis in the UK mog the ones back home idk wtf you're talking about.

You dumb fucking retard here are some fucking STATISTICS of 19 YEAR OLDS in 2020- sorted by shortest males in the world!!

View attachment 2898158

Height of Indians - but looks at West Bengal (where likely your cousins are)

View attachment 2898161


One fucking nation out of 30+ prove disproves my point stfu :soy::soy::soy:

That's equivalent of me picking out Punjab's and saying they're lighter than pakis on average. Like I said, just STFU
Sylhetis are shorter and look like subhumans. I'm not sure you get it because you seem to be coping about your own subhumanity so you want to drag us all into this. The funny thing is every Bengali in Canada laughs at you Sylheti guys for being so pathetic:ROFLMAO:

Also, that's not what the stats show, Wikipedia doesn't even link to the study because it's either 20 years old or doesn't exist:feelskek:

the average Bangladeshi zoomer from Chittagong is like 5'6 or 168 cm and that's with malnutrition so ofc the ones in Canada would be taller when you adjust for nutrition and environment. Not Sylhetis tho they;re subhuman:feelskek:

Actually, Uttar Pradesh has 250 million people and Bihar has 100 million people. That's 350 million people and you got proven wrong over and over again calling them Dravidian just because they're darker than us even though they're Indo-Aryan:feelsgah:
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Michael Myers and northern mogger
They're all the same
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: SecularIslamist and northern mogger
That is a picture of a general place you retard it's a whole bunch of regular people walking in some shopping district in Uttar Pradesh, they're just the average people there and they're darker:feelskek:

You can't cherrypick proper crowd pictures if they represent the average people out on the streets that's the opposite of cherrypicking outliers and shit:feelsgah:

I've already posted the students comparison between Bangla students from Rajshahi and Indian students from some university and the Bangla students were also lighter
Bangla students
View attachment 2898165

Indians
View attachment 2898166
You're a fucking pathetic nigger. Because one set of people from one state is a tiny bit lighter than some Bengalis it suddenly proves your point JFL. India has 1 fucking billion people unlike BDs 150 million, and I qualified my statement by saying non-dravidians. So I'm really taking into account the remaining 4/5 of the country and most of them in the north anyway.

They're all the same
This retard above wants to argue Bengalis are 0.1cm taller and 1 pixel lighter.
 
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: widdi, yen and northern mogger
Indians are vegan cucks and Israeli supporters. Vs Pakistan eat beef (more protein and healthy and leaner. And aren't slaves to the Jews. Easy mog.
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Michael Myers and northern mogger
Indians are vegan cucks and Israeli supporters. Vs Pakistan eat beef (more protein and healthy and leaner. And aren't slaves to the Jews. Easy mog.
@Lynxress
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Lynxress
You're a fucking pathetic nigger. Because one set of people from one state is a tiny bit lighter than some Bengalis it suddenly proves your point JFL. India has 1 fucking billion people unlike BDs 150 million, and I qualified my statement by saying non-dravidians. So I'm really taking into account the remaining 4/5 of the country and most of them in the north anyway.
Nope, you said that Bengalis were darker than Indians except for the Dravidians which is not true because Uttar Pradesh Bihar etc along with the rest of Central India are darker. Why is it a tiny state when it's got 250 million people in it:feelsgah:

The fact is you got proven wrong with evidence and now you''re coping. Uttar Pradesh is Indo-Aryan btw. Same for Bihar, which has a population of 100 million

Here are some more Indo-Aryan Indians from Hindi-speaking Indo-Aryan states and they're still darker. These guys are NOT "Dravidian" as in they are not from South India at all so you were wrong from the very beginning.
1714856176414


I don't mind being brown or dark or whatever but you keep making up bullshit when in reality Indians are darker than us until you reach Punjab and the Himalayan states :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: widdi, Michael Myers and northern mogger
Pakistan zindabad
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: Michael Myers and northern mogger
Nope, you said that Bengalis were darker than Indians except for the Dravidians which is not true because Uttar Pradesh Bihar etc along with the rest of Central India are darker. Why is it a tiny state when it's got 250 million people in it:feelsgah:

The fact is you got proven wrong with evidence and now you''re coping. Uttar Pradesh is Indo-Aryan btw. Same for Bihar, which has a population of 100 million

Here are some more Indo-Aryan Indians from Hindi-speaking Indo-Aryan states and they're still darker. These guys are NOT "Dravidian" as in they are not from South India at all so you were wrong from the very beginning.
View attachment 2898180
And here's a pic of a train in Dhaka, I see no difference more or less.

1714856684375

I don't mind being brown or dark or whatever but you keep making up bullshit when in reality Indians are darker than us until you reach Punjab and the Himalayan states :ROFLMAO:
Yeah I'm taking these places INTO ACCOUNT. On balance, Bengalis are darker than Indians (minus dravidians). You can post all the pics of dark looking people from Uttar Pradesh all you want. It won't change that fact. Some Bengalis being lighter by the tiniest shade than some Indian from Uttar Pradesh doesn't disprove the statement which applies to the overall population.
 
Sylhetis are shorter and look like subhumans. I'm not sure you get it because you seem to be coping about your own subhumanity so you want to drag us all into this. The funny thing is every Bengali in Canada laughs at you Sylheti guys for being so pathetic:ROFLMAO:

Also, that's not what the stats show, Wikipedia doesn't even link to the study because it's either 20 years old or doesn't exist:feelskek:

the average Bangladeshi zoomer from Chittagong is like 5'6 or 168 cm and that's with malnutrition so ofc the ones in Canada would be taller when you adjust for nutrition and environment. Not Sylhetis tho they;re subhuman:feelskek:
Unless you bring a stat that divides height by each region this is all wishful thinking and complete cope. I'm not accepting a pajeets conjecture over a worldwide study.

What an utter subhuman you are to argue people who live a couple hundred miles away and share similar heritage, are significantly taller. 5'6 lmao complete cope.
 
And here's a pic of a train in Dhaka, I see no difference more or less.
Not the same setting, I've already posted Indian students and Bengali students and they are darker than the Bengali students. Plus, you can't even make a phenotype comparison in this pic because of how shitty the picture is.

BTW even with a train picture, Indians are STILL darker than this as you can see from this one where you can actually see the faces of the people with proper lighting and a proper angle:ROFLMAO: Here are some more Indians from Mumbai, in Maharashtra, so not Uttar Pradesh and it's the same thing, they turn out darker.
1714857006570


It's funny how I've posted clear photos with proper lighting and good angles with faces visible while you posted some low quality image with a bad angle and bad lighting:feelsgah:
 
Last edited:
Unless you bring a stat that divides height by each region this is all wishful thinking and complete cope. I'm not accepting a pajeets conjecture over a worldwide study.

What an utter subhuman you are to argue people who live a couple hundred miles away and share similar heritage, are significantly taller. 5'6 lmao complete cope.
I've already posted the data to prove my point while I'm still waiting for your proof:feelskek:
 
Indians
I seen vlogs of dudes in the mountain areas in pakistan they are moggers
 
And here's a pic of a train in Dhaka, I see no difference more or less.

View attachment 2898196

Yeah I'm taking these places INTO ACCOUNT. On balance, Bengalis are darker than Indians (minus dravidians). You can post all the pics of dark looking people from Uttar Pradesh all you want. It won't change that fact. Some Bengalis being lighter by the tiniest shade than some Indian from Uttar Pradesh doesn't disprove the statement which applies to the overall population.
Yeah I'm taking these places INTO ACCOUNT. On balance, Bengalis are darker than Indians. You can post all the pics of dark looking people from Uttar Pradesh all you want. It won't change that fact. Some Bengalis being lighter by the tiniest shade than some Indian from Uttar Pradesh doesn't disprove the statement which applies to the overall population.
False. Uttar Pradesh/Bihar/Maharashtra/Central India in general is much darker than Bangladesh and you claimed otherwise. These are Indo-Aryan places, not Dravidian. Not only that, they're the most populated area of India, by pure numbers. So the people in Punjab or Kashmir or the Himalayan moggers are much much smaller in population so you were wrong again.

Uttar Pradesh- 250 million,Bihar- 100 million,Maharashtra- 110 million,Madhya Pradesh- 70 Million,Jharkand- 32 million,Chatisgarh- 25 million

These guys are like 60% of India lol and the rest are South Indians with a minority being Himalayans Punjabis. The people like in UP are what Indians are on average and majority, and then you have to add in the South Indians and it's obvious you're wrong because this would mean Banglas are lighter than the vast majority until you reach Punjab/Himalayas.

These regions are the same as Uttar Pradesh as well. Now compare Punjabis and Himalayans in population, they're maybe 70 million Max so you turned out to be wrong, yet again because they're a minority upon a minority in India.

The simple fact is Indians are darker than Bengalis until you reach those regions, even the student comparison proves this.
 
Last edited:
Unless you bring a stat that divides height by each region this is all wishful thinking and complete cope. I'm not accepting a pajeets conjecture over a worldwide study.

What an utter subhuman you are to argue people who live a couple hundred miles away and share similar heritage, are significantly taller. 5'6 lmao complete cope.
Also, that's not what the stats show, Wikipedia doesn't even link to the study because it's either 20 years old or doesn't exist:feelskek:
Screenshot 20240504 221522 1


An academic study by elite journal unlike your tales from Chittagong Mental Hospital.

 
  • JFL
Reactions: northern mogger
View attachment 2898233

An academic study by elite journal unlike your tales from Chittagong Mental Hospital.

Yep, the study I cited came from an actual hospital that published a medical journal. Where's your source?

This is some blog that doesn't cite where they got the Bangladesh data from, I still don't see a research source in this article so I guess it doesn't exist:feelskek:

Where did they get the height figures from Bangladesh from because they don't have any citations:ROFLMAO:
The "Academic study" doesn't even have sources or research from Bangladesh:lul:
 
Last edited:
Not the same setting, I've already posted Indian students and Bengali students and they are darker than the Bengali students. Plus, you can't even make a phenotype comparison in this pic because of how shitty the picture is.

BTW even with a train picture, Indians are STILL darker than this as you can see from this one where you can actually see the faces of the people with proper lighting and a proper angle:ROFLMAO: Here are some more Indians from Mumbai, in Maharashtra, so not Uttar Pradesh and it's the same thing, they turn out darker.
View attachment 2898210

It's funny how I've posted clear photos with proper lighting and good angles with faces visible while you posted some low quality image with a bad angle and bad lighting:feelsgah:
Picsart 24 05 05 01 25 02 862

DNR
How did you take them into account when places like Uttar Pradesh and etc are singificantly darker than Bengalis in proper crowd pictures? You even said that Bengalis were darker than them when the pictures showed that they are darker than even us. You said that they were Dravidians when they turned out to be Indo-Aryans not even close to being from South India

Uttar Pradesh- 250 million,Bihar- 100 million,Maharashtra- 110 million,Madhya Pradesh- 70 Million,Jharkand- 32 million,Chatisgarh- 25 million

See these population figures? Punjab has 27 million, Kashmir has even less and the HImalayan states have a couple million.

Th

The simple fact is Indians are darker than Bengalis until you reach those regions, even the student comparison proves this.
Yep, the study I cited came from an actual hospital that published a medical journal. Where's your source?

This is some blog that doesn't cite where they got the Bangladesh data from:feelskek:
 
Last edited:
  • JFL
Reactions: hello12344

Similar threads

Diarrhoea
Replies
0
Views
32
Diarrhoea
Diarrhoea
M
Replies
29
Views
377
brucewayne78
brucewayne78
butterworld
Replies
28
Views
304
Michael Myers
Michael Myers
i_love_roosters
Replies
32
Views
509
i_love_roosters
i_love_roosters
zyzzbrah1234
Replies
13
Views
198
Schizomogger
Schizomogger

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top