0.45 es ratio is NOT ideal

[Deleted member 91529]

Just sending this out to people who have 0.45 esrs and think it's ideal. It's not. Don't believe the propaganda. That shit is cyclops in most cases.

0.46-0.47 is ideal

 

[pfl]

Scientifically proven to be ideal but ok

 

[Deleted member 91529]

Scientifically proven to be ideal but ok

No, 0.46 is scientifically proven to be ideal

 

[Deleted member 29778]

Just sending this out to people who have 0.45 esrs and think it's ideal. It's not. Don't believe the propaganda. That shit is cyclops in most cases.

0.46-0.47 is ideal

 

[Deleted member 91529]

View attachment 3169639

Why does the guy i posted look so close set then

 

[Deleted member 29778]

Why does the guy i posted look so close set then

Because his left eye is deviated you fool

 

[Deleted member 29778]

This guy has 0.44 esr

 

[Deleted member 91529]

This guy has 0.44 esr

Its 0.4495

 

[Deleted member 91529]

Because his left eye is deviated you fool

how is it devited wym

 

[Deleted member 29778]

how is it devited wym

Look at his right eye , it is centered, the left is like looking in another direction

 

[NorwoodAscender]

i mean based on what

.45 is way more dimorphic than .47

 

[haymaker283]

It's proven that 0.46 is the ideal ES ratio and it would make sense for ideal range to deviate by 0.01, as it's close enough.
Therefore, 0.45-0.47 is ideal.

 

[NarrowBoneMarrow]

ideal doesn’t mean anything, there can be moggers ranging from 0.42-ideal and some rare ones even below that

 

[Deleted member 29778]

ideal doesn’t mean anything, there can be moggers ranging from 0.42-ideal and some rare ones even below that

Stfu cyclop

 

[Deleted member 91529]

i mean based on what

.45 is way more dimorphic than .47

I saw a guy who had 0.45 and looked giga cyclops, the entire thread said he had close set eyes

 

[Deleted member 29778]

how is it devited wym

Try measure this.morph i got 0.444

 

[Deleted member 91529]

It's proven that 0.46 is the ideal ES ratio and it would make sense for ideal range to deviate by 0.01, as it's close enough.
Therefore, 0.45-0.47 is ideal.

0.455-0.465 imo. Sometimes 0.47 looks noticably wide set and sometimes 0.45 looks noticably close set.

 

[NarrowBoneMarrow]

Stfu cyclop

U are a low iq laughing stock what i said is true

 

[Deleted member 91529]

View attachment 3169647

Try measure this.morph i got 0.444

Yep 0.443 basically that

 

[Deleted member 91529]

U are a low iq laughing stock what i said is true

Those moggers would look way better with 46 esr

 

[Deleted member 29778]

U are a low iq laughing stock what i said is true

Yes you are right because that's just one failo

 

[NorwoodAscender]

I saw a guy who had 0.45 and looked giga cyclops, the entire thread said he had close set eyes

hmm weird. wouldn’t be surprised if u said .44.

pretty sure i’m on the edge of .45 and .46 and i don’t rlly look clops

 

[Deleted member 91529]

hmm weird. wouldn’t be surprised if u said .44.

pretty sure i’m on the edge of .45 and .46 and i don’t rlly look clops

my friend said u look low ipd when i sent ur pics once

 

[NorwoodAscender]

my friend said u look low ipd when i sent ur pics once

weird. maybe ur right idk

 

[Deleted member 91529]

View attachment 3169657View attachment 3169658
weird. maybe ur right idk

Nah i think ur eye spacing is good i just think 0.45 isnt perfectly ideal, I don't think ur eyes look close tbh

 

[Deleted member 93012]

Wide IPD is ideal. Also @thecel already made a thread about high ES ratios but I can't find it for some reason.

 

[cmoon]

View attachment 3169657View attachment 3169658
weird. maybe ur right idk

hey how's this site called

 

[NorwoodAscender]

hey how's this site called

looksrate2. don’t listen to the measurements the site originally give u when ur put ur photo in. adjust the dots urself