#1 dumbass trait

[Harold O'brien]

Being dismissive of philosophy while it underpins all fields of human knowledge

 

[Veganist]

what about being dismissive of science in order to make edgy threads on looksmax

 

[Harold O'brien]

what about being dismissive of science in order to make edgy threads on looksmax

You don't understand science is just application of philosophy

And there must be something wrong with your brain if legitimate criticisms concerning epistemological advancement is the content you consider edgy in a sea of race bait, misogyny and 12 year olds flirting with fascism

 

[khvirgin]

there are people dimissive of ALL philosophy?

 

[fauxfox]

Another one is rejecting all science because it conflicts some of their viewpoints.
They always have the same talking points, saying "science is the new religion" afterwards. This is a diss towards religion as they admit they believe both are in completely blind and retarded faith.

 

[Prince88]

theology underpins everything

 

[Deleted member 18244]

there are people dimissive of ALL philosophy?

Yeah, i hate all that thinking shit

 

[Harold O'brien]

theology underpins everything

wrong

 

[Harold O'brien]

Another one is rejecting all science because it conflicts some of their viewpoints.
They always have the same talking points, saying "science is the new religion" afterwards. This is a diss towards religion as they admit they believe both are in completely blind and retarded faith.

science requires faith too

if an experiment gives me the same outcome one million times in a row, how can I conclude the result of the one million and first result without blind faith?

Uniformitarianism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

you have blind faith in the invariance of the metaphysical principles underpinning science

 

[Veganist]

You don't understand science is just application of philosophy

And there must be something wrong with your brain if legitimate criticisms concerning epistemological advancement is the content you consider edgy in a sea of race bait, misogyny and 12 year olds flirting with fascism

ur right tbh

I take it back

I just wanted to be the first to reply in your thread

 

[fauxfox]

science requires faith too

if an experiment gives me the same outcome one million times in a row, how can I conclude the result of the one million and first result without blind faith?

Uniformitarianism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

you have blind faith in the invariance of the metaphysical principles underpinning science

There's a big difference in faith and blind faith.
Blind faith is believing in YHVH the Abrahamic God and everything in his books, there's no hard evidence for this.

Whereas when I see countless scientific studies and experiments that further support things such as the laws of thermodynamics. One is substantiated the other isn't. Of course there's an element of faith put into this, there's an element of faith put into everything you believe. But these two are clearly different.

 

[Harold O'brien]

There's a big difference in faith and blind faith.
Blind faith is believing in YHVH the Abrahamic God and everything in his books, there's no hard evidence for this.

Whereas when I see countless scientific studies and experiments that further support things such as the laws of thermodynamics. One is substantiated the other isn't. Of course there's an element of faith put into this, there's an element of faith put into everything you believe. But these two are clearly different.

doesn't matter. all of these are based on the principle of uniformitarianism, which you have no evidence for

 

[fauxfox]

doesn't matter. all of these are based on the principle of uniformitarianism, which you have no evidence for

The response to this is simple. Science isn't invincible. Science is a tool constructed by humans to analyze and utilize their surroundings. Science is always changing and evolving as more people contribute to it.

Whereas Abrahamic religion is unchanging, even as we unearth countless fossils across the world that debunk the 7 day creation myth, it doesn't change. Supposedly it's the word of God so no one wants to change it. But there's nothing to substantiate this.

You probably saw some retard online and fell for the "science is the new religion!" meme.
Religion has simply not achieved as much as scientific theory has in it's relatively short lifetime. When religion creates the computer you reply to this post on, tell me. Religion will keep slipping away until God reveals himself to us.

 

[Harold O'brien]

The response to this is simple. Science isn't invincible. Science is a tool constructed by humans to analyze and utilize their surroundings. Science is always changing and evolving as more people contribute to it.

Whereas Abrahamic religion is unchanging, even as we unearth countless fossils across the world that debunk the 7 day creation myth, it doesn't change. Supposedly it's the word of God so no one wants to change it. But there's nothing to substantiate this.

You probably saw some retard online and fell for the "science is the new religion!" meme.
Religion has simply not achieved as much as scientific theory has in it's relatively short lifetime. When religion creates the computer you reply to this post on, tell me. Religion will keep slipping away until God reveals himself to us.

my response is simple: no matter how much science "evolves" it doesn't change the categorical fact that it relies on an unprovable assumption akin to the existence of a deity

you rn:

(and science isn't the new religion btw, both are just philosophy)

 

[fauxfox]

my response is simple: no matter how much science "evolves" it doesn't change the categorical fact that it relies on an unprovable assumption akin to the existence of a deity

you rn:

(and science isn't the new religion btw, both are just philosophy)

Well so far these universal laws we've established have treated us very very VERY well, better than any other time period in history. So if you want to assert a universe with such fundamental inconsistency you need to bring evidence that it's true.

Else you can keep posting crying wojaks on the computer that exists because of the same "unproveable assumptions" you decry.

 

[Wallenberg]

based atheist @fauxfox

 

[Deleted member 15827]

You don't understand science is just application of philosophy

And there must be something wrong with your brain if legitimate criticisms concerning epistemological advancement is the content you consider edgy in a sea of race bait, misogyny and 12 year olds flirting with fascism

if you think fascism is infantile youre a midwit

 

[Deleted member 17872]

Just lol at these Scientism faggots who doesn't even know that science evolved from philosophy, astrology, alchemy and similar other "pseudosciences"

 

[Harold O'brien]

Well so far these universal laws we've established have treated us very very VERY well, better than any other time period in history. So if you want to assert a universe with such fundamental inconsistency you need to bring evidence that it's true.

Else you can keep posting crying wojaks on the computer that exists because of the same "unproveable assumptions" you decry.

you are moving the goalposts here, I love science and am not discrediting its obvious achievements.

to be clear: I am not taking a position here, whereas you are. I am merely stating the categorical fact that if science relies on an unprovable assumption then it is based on faith.

 

[n0rthface]

if you think fascism is infantile youre a midwit

 

[FailedNormieManlet]

Science has NEVER been a religion, a religion is dogma which can NEVER BE PROVEN WRONG. GOD'S WORD IS FINAL. Whereas in science we recognise there are FLAWS in our knowledge and things are subject to change. And so thus "science is the new religion" cannot really be true. The only people who take science as a religion are reddit users

 

[fauxfox]

you are moving the goalposts here, I love science and am not discrediting it's obvious achievements.

to be clear: I am not taking a position here, whereas you are. I am merely stating the categorical fact that if science relies on an unprovable assumption then it is based on faith.

Everything we believe in ultimately has an element of faith in it, this is undeniable.
Is science special to you in this regard?

Also calling something an "unproveable assumption" is so retarded and arbitrary, literally everything can be called an "unproveable assumption".
I can't prove I'm not a brain in the vat. That changes nothing, I make do with the laws and rules I can observe.

 

[Harold O'brien]

Everything we believe in ultimately has an element of faith in it

exactly, now you get it

 

[FailedNormieManlet]

Everything we believe in ultimately has an element of faith in it, this is undeniable.
Is science special to you in this regard?

Also calling something an "unproveable assumption is so retarded and arbitrary.
I can't prove I'm not a brain in the vat. That changes nothing, I make do with the laws and rules I can observe.

even athiesm requires faith -> negative faith, the faith in that something does not exist

 

[Harold O'brien]

Science has NEVER been a religion, a religion is dogma which can NEVER BE PROVEN WRONG. GOD'S WORD IS FINAL. Whereas in science we recognise there are FLAWS in our knowledge and things are subject to change. And so thus "science is the new religion" cannot really be true. The only people who take science as a religion are reddit users

so the time and spacial invariance of natural laws isn't dogma?

 

[FailedNormieManlet]

so the time and spacial invariance of natural laws isn't dogma?

I am not a physicst so you might have to expand on that a bit my friend. I am only a mere biologist

 

[fauxfox]

even athiesm requires faith -> negative faith, the faith in that something does not exist

Yes. Personally I'm not a straight up atheist myself it seems very shortsighted, I'm agnostic.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

All i know is that there is no argument for causality as described by modern science.

 

[Harold O'brien]

Also calling something an "unproveable assumption" is so retarded and arbitrary, literally everything can be called an "unproveable assumption".
I can't prove I'm not a brain in the vat. That changes nothing, I make do with the laws and rules I can observe.

If you were to create theory which depended upon your brain being in a vat then it would be fair to say that it is a belief system and requires faith

 

[Harold O'brien]

All i know is that there is no argument for causality as described by modern science.

when did you stop being a retarded user

 

[Deleted member 15791]

Nigga think he smarter then us

 

[IncelsBraincels]

i dont understand a single thing in this thread

 

[Kingcel32]

i dont understand a single thing in this thread

basically philosophy is the bedrock behind everything, and he's saying that people who don't worry or think it's retarded are the actual retards. I do agree with this, philosophy after all is finding meaning and understanding in our existence. If you reject that simple concept than just die because there is honestly no point in you being here if you can not find a meaning to exist.

 

[Wallenberg]

View attachment 1752618

Many people consider the thoughts and actions of Hindu nationalists fascists.

 

[Deleted member 17872]

when did you stop being a retarded user

Still salty because i bodied u in the IQ debate.