shizuku11111
i look like my avi
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2023
- Posts
- 12,053
- Reputation
- 16,564
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
trannySTACY
Theognis of Megara, 6th century BC poet, whom Nietzsche uses as a mouthpiece for the ancient caste we are talking about, regarded the difference between nobles and plebs to be physiological, the latter being uglier, stupider, worse with money, less artistic, and less patient, all related to their impure bloodlines.What is it about?
Brutal innitStacy
I meant like being an aristocrat means you have a stewardship over less civilised people or the massesI don't know how it connects to Evola, unless he's talking about his idea of a spiritual aristocracy (which was quite similar to Nietzsche and more obvious in his most unknown early works).
"muh, rationality". I bet you are much more emotional than what you think you write, you leave rationality in the closet. I get the impression that you want to change, but a characteristic of narcissists is that unhinging their bark is complex and tiring.In fact egoism is rational and NATURAL most of all.
I rarely ever act on a whim. I have emotions like everyone else but don't let them dictate my choices too often. Rough for narcissists if they can't untangle their emotions as you say, I changed quite a lot over time as I'm open to it."muh, rationality". I bet you are much more emotional than what you think you write, you leave rationality in the closet. I get the impression that you want to change, but a characteristic of narcissists is that unhinging their bark is complex and tiring.
Nah, your writing is illustrative. Your egorational "conceptions" are based on that.I rarely ever act on a whim. I have emotions like everyone else but don't let them dictate my choices too often. Rough for narcissists if they can't untangle their emotions as you say, I changed quite a lot over time as I'm open to it.
These are shitposts on a forum, my writing is quite different from what I say here as I don't intend to publish these posts. You have far too tiny a window into my full personhood to draw such big conclusions.Nah, your writing is illustrative. Your egorational "conceptions" are based on that.
It doesn't take much to understand some things. And it is not necessary to go deep to find out the bottom.These are shitposts on a forum, my writing is quite different from what I say here as I don't intend to publish these posts. You have far too tiny a window into my full personhood to draw such big conclusions.
Sure, but I'm not a narcissist so you drew the wrong conclusion. I have lived a very specific kind of life that has led me to believe certain things about people at large. My philosophy is the result of experience, and not of a hardwired tendency.It doesn't take much to understand some things. And it is not necessary to go deep to find out the bottom.
Convinced you, pleased you. You overestimate the effect of some things, few things matter.Sure, but I'm not a narcissist so you drew the wrong conclusion. I have lived a very specific kind of life that has led me to believe certain things about people at large. My philosophy is the result of experience, and not of a hardwired tendency.
Elaborate.Convinced you, pleased you.
I don't, it would most likely be unproductive, or it would take a long time to produce something, which is effectively unproductive.Elaborate.
I'm always open to new information about myself in order to change. I'm not a person critique is wasted on.I don't, it would most likely be unproductive, or it would take a long time to produce something, which is effectively unproductive.
All right, I'll keep that in mind.I'm always open to new information about myself in order to change. I'm not a person critique is wasted on.
Aside from that, have you read Spinoza (ethics) and Kant (critique of pure reason)?I'm always open to new information about myself in order to change. I'm not a person critique is wasted on.
Not yet. Will do eventually, I'm not too hyped about Kant as I've skimmed some of his ideas. I prefer Nietzsche, but then again I have only read him of the two.Aside from that, have you read Spinoza (ethics) and Kant (critique of pure reason)?