140° gonial angle or am i measuing bad?

[PubertyMaxxer]

 

[Deleted member 14160]

Yeah about 130-135.
Barrett has the same kind as do I. I think it's to adjust for hyper forward growth because it's more common in women so the ramus almost extends backwards instead of relatively vertical as it more commonly does.

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

125 maybe

But far form the ideal of 115

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Yeah about 130-135.
Barrett has the same kind as do I. I think it's to adjust for hyper forward growth because it's more common in women so the ramus almost extends backwards instead of relatively vertical as it more commonly does.

Is there a man with (nearly) straight vertical ramus yet top tier forward growth?

Until now only morphs are

 

[randomvanish]

the ideal of 115

isn't the ideal around 120? 115 kinda ogremax

 

[Deleted member 14160]

Is there a man with (nearly) straight vertical ramus yet top tier forward growth?

Until now only morphs are

View attachment 1523478

Only hyper masc guys with box jaw areas come to mind

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

isn't the ideal around 120? 115 kinda ogremax

View attachment download.webp

 

[Deleted member 14160]

isn't the ideal around 120? 115 kinda ogremax

View attachment 1523483

View attachment 1523484

Yeah I think gonial angle in isolation is kind of cope, more important is ramus and mandible length.

 

[PubertyMaxxer]

Yeah I think gonial angle in isolation is kind of cope, more important is ramus and mandible length.

Short gonial angle allows for longer total ( ramus + body) length