15-17 ascension, am I making HTN yet?

[willjjj]

Less than 2yr diff before and after

 

[willjjj]

Bump

 

[moid_user271k]

good ascension defiantly not htn tho

 

[willjjj]

Bump

 

[willjjj]

Bump

 

[willjjj]

bump

 

[willjjj]

Bump

 

[iblameocclusalcant]

Less than 2yr diff before and after

Yes
Fix your nose tip

 

[willjjj]

Yes
Fix your nose tip

Ty man

 

[eddz]

1st pic: Sub 3
2nd pic: LLTN

With a rhinoplasty you could ascend to at least MTN aslo get a tan man.

 

[diobrand]

g

Less than 2yr diff before and after

get lashes asap

 

[anphamer]

1st pic: Sub 3
2nd pic: LLTN

With a rhinoplasty you could ascend to at least MTN aslo get a tan man.

 

[anphamer]

Less than 2yr diff before and after

YES you are. Everyone who says otherwise is a jealous cuck

 

[eddz]

YES you are. Everyone who says otherwise is a jealous cuck

how is the second pic htn please

 

[eddz]

how is the second pic htn please

its 55% facial harmony at best

 

[anphamer]

YES you are. Everyone who says otherwise is a jealous cuck

its 55% facial harmony at best

if yer say so

 

[eddz]

if yer say so

put the face in faciqlabs and see what it gives you i did a lot of faces that 100% is not above 55% facial harmony but we also have to take into account lens distorsion from close proximity to camera but that is not htn no way bro. maybe bottom 55-60% face rn. But with improvements could ascend to top 40% definately (5.5/10)

 

[willjjj]

1st pic: Sub 3
2nd pic: LLTN

With a rhinoplasty you could ascend to at least MTN aslo get a tan man.

R we deadass bro just hating to hate

 

[willjjj]

YES you are. Everyone who says otherwise is a jealous cuck

Hell yeah bro thank you

 

[willjjj]

put the face in faciqlabs and see what it gives you i did a lot of faces that 100% is not above 55% facial harmony but we also have to take into account lens distorsion from close proximity to camera but that is not htn no way bro. maybe bottom 55-60% face rn. But with improvements could ascend to top 40% definately (5.5/10)

Not gna rate myself but if im significantly below average in the first pic then it makes me wonder what you’d consider yourself as

 

[iqletandrew73]

put the face in faciqlabs and see what it gives you i did a lot of faces that 100% is not above 55% facial harmony but we also have to take into account lens distorsion from close proximity to camera but that is not htn no way bro. maybe bottom 55-60% face rn. But with improvements could ascend to top 40% definately (5.5/10)

genuinely kill yourself with this tiktokcel type bullshit

 

[eddz]

you’d consider yourself as

this is not about me mate. But if you insist I got 79% facial harmony on faciqlabs

 

[eddz]

tiktokcel type bullshit

its called being accurate and professional you dont even know how cameras work mate

 

[willjjj]

this is not about me mate. But if you insist I got 79% facial harmony on faciqlabs

Wowzers

 

[eddz]

Wowzers

whatever makes you sleep at night buddy

 

[iqletandrew73]

its called being accurate and professional you dont even know how cameras work mate

this is not about cameras g you're a genuine idiot if you think a faceiqlab facial harmony will determine if someone is htn or not, he's easily lhtn considering the picture has shit lighting cam quality distortion and angle, yet he still looks better than 80% of population

 

[eddz]

this is not about cameras g you're a genuine idiot if you think a faceiqlab facial harmony will determine if someone is htn or not, he's easily lhtn considering the picture has shit lighting cam quality distortion and angle, yet he still looks better than 80% of population

i can tell the ratios are off.
1. Lip proportions are off, far set eyes, high set eyebrows bad nose, that is something poor quality inteferes with its obvious its a bone thing and maybe he put a low quality pic for a reason.