hatetobemale
Iron
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2026
- Posts
- 17
- Reputation
- 18
What is an Attractive Man? Ireland 1967
What amazed me the most is that the vast majority of men commenting on this video are looking at the exact same evidence, the exact same red flags, and yet the penny never drops for any of them. Quite the contrary—the interpretation of all the normies and copers in the comments is completely optimistic.
You have to be utterly blind not to connect the dots, but it turns out almost all of humanity—except for MGTOWs—fails to see it.
In the video, the interviewer asks random women on the street what physically attracts them to a man. He completely fails to get a single answer regarding a physical feature that women perceive as attractive in a man, let alone beautiful. They always default to personality traits, and the only physical thing they care about is height. Actually, it’s not even height, it's just being taller than them.
The interviewer desperately tries to extract an answer about physiological/biological traits that attract them, explicitly spoon-feeding them questions about physical appearance. And even then, these women answer him in an alien language, talking strictly about personality traits, or at best, height. One woman there even answers without a shred of shame that a man's looks do not interest her and are completely worthless in her eyes.
Now, this is the part where even the "blackpillers" reveal themselves to be bluepilled, failing to understand that height is not beauty! Women's obsession with height is proof in itself that they are not attracted to a man's looks—or in other words, they are not attracted to men.
Yet, people can be unbelievably dense and interpret this as something romantic, because they misinterpret the terms:
* Personality actually means: Doer, Status, or Subculture.
* Height actually means: Size, not beauty!
If height had anything to do with beauty, women wouldn't be obsessed with it over every other body part, treating it almost as a separate category while completely ignoring everything else—like the face, voice, veins, skeletal geometry, etc.
What further demonstrates women's complete lack of appreciation for the harsh, anti-neotenous masculine aesthetic is that not only do they focus exclusively on height while the masculine aesthetic remains invisible to them—it's worse: height itself as a baseline doesn't even interest them. It only matters to them that the man is tall relative to them!
Here is what height and personality have in common: In both cases, the man is not the object of attraction, and the man holds no intrinsic aesthetic value. It is only about what the man, as a tool, makes her feel. Whether it's through "personality" (by being a Doer) or by being physically larger than her, making her feel feminine, small, and delicate in comparison.
It is never you that interests her. It is always about her, and you, as a man, are merely a prop that makes her feel more desirable, feminine, and beautiful. When women say they care mostly about personality, they aren't lying! But contrary to how clueless men interpret it, it is not a good sign, and it's definitely not romantic. It's the exact opposite—it's because they cannot love or desire men.
Therefore, looksmaxxing is a total waste of time if it's meant to attract women. Unless you are doing it for yourself, don't bother doing it for them.
And if you are trying to attract women, you are better off investing in surgeries that make you more neotenous with less masculine dimorphism. Because while these "straight" women require a "deep connection" and a context of personality/doer and height/size just to tolerate men, toward other neotenous women they express the exact same type of visual, raw masculine sexuality.
What amazed me the most is that the vast majority of men commenting on this video are looking at the exact same evidence, the exact same red flags, and yet the penny never drops for any of them. Quite the contrary—the interpretation of all the normies and copers in the comments is completely optimistic.
You have to be utterly blind not to connect the dots, but it turns out almost all of humanity—except for MGTOWs—fails to see it.
In the video, the interviewer asks random women on the street what physically attracts them to a man. He completely fails to get a single answer regarding a physical feature that women perceive as attractive in a man, let alone beautiful. They always default to personality traits, and the only physical thing they care about is height. Actually, it’s not even height, it's just being taller than them.
The interviewer desperately tries to extract an answer about physiological/biological traits that attract them, explicitly spoon-feeding them questions about physical appearance. And even then, these women answer him in an alien language, talking strictly about personality traits, or at best, height. One woman there even answers without a shred of shame that a man's looks do not interest her and are completely worthless in her eyes.
Now, this is the part where even the "blackpillers" reveal themselves to be bluepilled, failing to understand that height is not beauty! Women's obsession with height is proof in itself that they are not attracted to a man's looks—or in other words, they are not attracted to men.
Yet, people can be unbelievably dense and interpret this as something romantic, because they misinterpret the terms:
* Personality actually means: Doer, Status, or Subculture.
* Height actually means: Size, not beauty!
If height had anything to do with beauty, women wouldn't be obsessed with it over every other body part, treating it almost as a separate category while completely ignoring everything else—like the face, voice, veins, skeletal geometry, etc.
What further demonstrates women's complete lack of appreciation for the harsh, anti-neotenous masculine aesthetic is that not only do they focus exclusively on height while the masculine aesthetic remains invisible to them—it's worse: height itself as a baseline doesn't even interest them. It only matters to them that the man is tall relative to them!
Here is what height and personality have in common: In both cases, the man is not the object of attraction, and the man holds no intrinsic aesthetic value. It is only about what the man, as a tool, makes her feel. Whether it's through "personality" (by being a Doer) or by being physically larger than her, making her feel feminine, small, and delicate in comparison.
It is never you that interests her. It is always about her, and you, as a man, are merely a prop that makes her feel more desirable, feminine, and beautiful. When women say they care mostly about personality, they aren't lying! But contrary to how clueless men interpret it, it is not a good sign, and it's definitely not romantic. It's the exact opposite—it's because they cannot love or desire men.
Therefore, looksmaxxing is a total waste of time if it's meant to attract women. Unless you are doing it for yourself, don't bother doing it for them.
And if you are trying to attract women, you are better off investing in surgeries that make you more neotenous with less masculine dimorphism. Because while these "straight" women require a "deep connection" and a context of personality/doer and height/size just to tolerate men, toward other neotenous women they express the exact same type of visual, raw masculine sexuality.
