2 months of descending during summer, did i get even worse?

Holy overrate
" I know i'm on the lower side of LTN" dude is not LLTN MMTN might be a stretch but LMTN - MTN is fair
It's a known fact that mltn used to be avg, due to looksflation hltn is now bare average

MLTN has never been average. Looksflation will never increase the average because that goes against the principle against what it actually means to be "average". If everyone got uglier, MTN would still be average. If everyone became better looking, MTN would still be average and this is because it's implied in the name "MID / MIDDLE tier normie"

(This is not PSL scale but the generic out of ten rating that people use)

1-4/10 - LTN - This is where the term SUB5 and SUB3 come from. All SUB5 even means is below average? Why? because the average is 5/10, which means 50% of people look better than you and 50% of people look worse than you.

5-6/10 - MTN

7-8/10 - HTN

9-10 - CL/ Chad


 
  • +1
Reactions: V0xxr
" I know i'm on the lower side of LTN" dude is not LLTN MMTN might be a stretch but LMTN - MTN is fair


MLTN has never been average. Looksflation will never increase the average because that goes against the principle against what it actually means to be "average". If everyone got uglier, MTN would still be average. If everyone became better looking, MTN would still be average and this is because it's implied in the name "MID / MIDDLE tier normie"

(This is not PSL scale but the generic out of ten rating that people use)

1-4/10 - LTN - This is where the term SUB5 and SUB3 come from. All SUB5 even means is below average? Why? because the average is 5/10, which means 50% of people look better than you and 50% of people look worse than you.

5-6/10 - MTN

7-8/10 - HTN

9-10 - CL/ Chad


Completely agree but 5/10 is the numerical average, not the actual looks average
Less/more than 50% of the population is below/above 5/10, let's say 60% of people are sub5,40% are higher than 5, that'd make the average around 4.5/10
 
Completely agree but 5/10 is the numerical average, not the actual looks average
Less/more than 50% of the population is below/above 5/10, let's say 60% of people are sub5,40% are higher than 5, that'd make the average around 4.5/10
Saying that 60% of people are sub5 wouldn't make the average not 5/10, it'd just make 5/10 appear uglier
 
Saying that 60% of people are sub5 wouldn't make the average not 5/10, it'd just make 5/10 appear uglier
Correction: 60% of people being sub5 is impossible, it'd just mean that 5's are uglier but 50% of people would still be a 5. 60% of people being sub5 is impossible unless you crossreferenced it with a predetermined data set with a group of people at each ranking (1/10) , (2/10) etc up till ten with a new group.
 

Similar threads

Pdru
Replies
28
Views
374
Pdru
Pdru
Lando Llama
Replies
4
Views
49
IronMike
IronMike
mewannaascendnow
Replies
7
Views
85
truefoidslayerpqoqo
truefoidslayerpqoqo
foidslayer6243
Replies
12
Views
147
foidslayer6243
foidslayer6243
B
Replies
5
Views
42
benny3636
B

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top