2022 Race Dating Data (Newest Data)

[Deleted member 8365]

Yes, above average black men are slayers. Honestly, after seeing so many non-black men who are HTN+ flop on dating apps, I realized it's not that bad for black men. The high psl latino dude in our discord is one example - he got fewer likes than HTN villagers on Tinder in my area which predominantly white. There was another 6'3 HTN white dude who got 2 likes on Hinge in a week - HTN+ villagers get way more likes on Hinge in a day than he did in a week that's when I realized that maybe black men don't have it that bad tbh.

No shit

 

[whiteissuperior]

This study is the same shit that has been disseminated time and time again.
No relation to reality.
At what age do men reach their peak again?
Lmao

Not really

40 year old men are getting more messages than 21 year olds cuz divorced single moms are looking for a new betabux. Most older women are looking for a new betabux and are much more likely to use dating apps.

This study is likely just counting total opening messages from all women. If it only counted PRIME women (18-25) the graph would look completely different

 

[Deleted member 17430]

Graph is probably taking logarithms or something. And yes bring normalized by gender, That’s standard in data science


It’s not comparing the sheer numbers

It's standard in data science? It's completely misleading though...

Any unsuspecting normie that stumbles onto this graph will end up believing that white men get more messages than white women. If I didn't already know any better, it's what I would've concluded too from just looking at the graph. When in reality, all it means is that white men get more messages compared to other races of men and that's why they're so high, but white women still get a lot more messages than any group of men.

This normalization by gender shouldn't be standard practice, it's just wrong. It messes up the whole perception of the data. Maybe it makes more sense in other areas like medicine, but on a dating / attractiveness statistic? They're just rendering their study useless.

 

[Marsiere214]

They need to seperate curry from asian. It's annoying

Don’t they consider the middle east and india white in america?

 

[whiteissuperior]

It's standard in data science? It's completely misleading though...

Any unsuspecting normie that stumbles onto this graph will end up believing that white men get more messages than white women. If I didn't already know any better, it's what I would've concluded too from just looking at the graph. When in reality, all it means is that white men get more messages compared to other races of men and that's why they're so high, but white women still get a lot more messages than any group of men.

This normalization by gender shouldn't be standard practice, it's just wrong. It messes up the whole perception of the data. Maybe it makes more sense in other areas like medicine, but on a dating / attractiveness statistic? They're just rendering their study useless.

Normie’s are dumb. These graphs aren’t made for them. These graphs are usually in papers and the ppl meant to be reading them understand what it means. Look at the y axis, it’s a 0-1 scale, details about how that’s calculated would have been included in the paper

 

[OldRooster]

Where's the link to this article. I need it asap lol

There is no article. The chart in OP is a fabrication. jfl at believing The Economist , one of the most prestigeous Magazines in the world, would publish an online dating survey based upon race. OP is a gullible twit for believing it is real.

 

[fogdart]

There is no article. The chart in OP is a fabrication. jfl at believing The Economist , one of the most prestigeous Magazines in the world, would publish an online dating survey based upon race. OP is a gullible twit for believing it is real.

Lol they actually did write this article on dating in 2018 so I thought that the graph in OP was the updated version. This is the link to the old article they wrote:

How the internet has changed dating

Better algorithms, business models and data could have even more people finding partners

www.economist.com

 

[thereallegend]

That chart basically means that 40 year old men are more likely to get messages from 40 year old women than 20 yo guys from 20 yo women

That's what I'm thinking too.

 

[OldRooster]

Lol they actually did write this article on dating in 2018 so I thought that the graph in OP was the updated version. This is the link to the old article they wrote:

How the internet has changed dating

Better algorithms, business models and data could have even more people finding partners

www.economist.com

I saw that, it is from an economic, market growth, perspective. Which is why I specified "online survey based upon race"

 

[ifyouwannabemylover]

Brutal age like fine wine pill, men peak at
45View attachment 1996039

peak for betabuxxing 45 year old tinder roasties

 

[ifyouwannabemylover]

asian women getting the most messages doesn't surprise me tbh. i think they have less attitude than other foids on average.

 

[Blackgymmax]

surprised black men are so high up

i thought for sure we'd be below asians

@fogdart @PrinceLuenLeoncur @Blackgymmax thoughts?

Mulattos are mixed in with blacks. This doesnt apply to us. Tyrone fishes also get a good number of initial messages but overall likes dont usually compare to white Chad

 

[ORW2]

View attachment 1995956

@Moneymaxerr where'd you find this btw? Link if you have it

Things I've learned from this:

1. Lighter skinned hispanic women in my experience have HIGHER SMV than white women. With the same skin tone, latin women win out because they have higher sex appeal. The only easy, cooperative hispanic girls are the indigenous blooded, darker skinned "morenas" (my experience).

2. Black males and Asian women being so high confirms sexual dimorphism.

3. Men and women are at equal playing field at 30, when men start to make money and women are roasties.

this isn't new data jfl, it's just same old 2009 data republished again.

do you honestly believe black women get less sex requests in 2022 than indian men? do you honestly believe white women get less sex reqests than white men? in 2022 this is huge cope.

 

[Lawton88]

View attachment 1995956

@Moneymaxerr where'd you find this btw? Link if you have it

Things I've learned from this:

1. Lighter skinned hispanic women in my experience have HIGHER SMV than white women. With the same skin tone, latin women win out because they have higher sex appeal. The only easy, cooperative hispanic girls are the indigenous blooded, darker skinned "morenas" (my experience).

2. Black males and Asian women being so high confirms sexual dimorphism.

3. Men and women are at equal playing field at 30, when men start to make money and women are roasties.

Men are never anywhere near a woman's SMV unless he is a Chadlite equivalent for his age. An average man in his 30s and above is just as much an undesirable male to similar aged females as a male in his 20s is that is average looking. The 30s and above is where a male that held up in looks and isn't broke does have way more LTR value than a female his age though.