2022 Would-You-Rather #7 · Shit-Aging Chad vs Forever-Young Normie

[thecel]

Would You Rather

• A
  • have a 9/10 face and Norwood 1 hair at age 20
  • (gradually descending from 20 to 30) have a 6/10 face and Norwood 3 at age 30
  • be descended all the way down to 3/10 and totally bald at age 40 and beyond
• B
  • have a 5/10 face and Norwood 1 hair for your full lifetime
  • your face never ages
  • no hair(line) aging
    • no hair loss
    • no greying

 

[Deleted member]

easiest question ever

A

9/10 face (gigachad) for 10 years?

mogs being normie for a lifetime JFL @ U

 

[thecel]

easiest question ever

A

9/10 face (gigachad) for 10 years?

mogs being normie for a lifetime JFL @ U

cope harder. Interpolate. 9/10 at 20 to 6/10 at 30, so 7.5/10 at 25.

 

[Deleted member 16984]

millennials and zoomers trying to look like 40 year old teenagers

 

[Deleted member 16530]

Genuinely good thread because I cannot decide

Good job man

 

[Deleted member 4106]

Option B, it would be ridiculous to live only to 30

 

[damnit]

option b, peter pan maxxing is better.

 

[Deleted member 2382]

I would chose A assuming you had 9/10 looks from age 12

 

[CFW432]

Option b cause I can just get surgeries to ascend to chadlite, - chad status. Now I'm a chad that never ages.

 

[NodiN]

if i have an 18 yo face at age 70 , id have to fuck a 70 yo hag if im dating within my social circles . and middle aged women would think i have a baby face. not to mention i might have alzheimer and become too crippled to slay .

A