2025 blackpill - Love & Commitment: The Aging Bachelor pill

[Sprinkles]

freedom to not reproduce

raising kids is slavery

why would I spend hundreds of thousands of dollars raising kids when I could spend all that on self indulgence ?

I wouldn’t be surprised if you were a christ cuck too.

 

[reptiles]

I can't answer your question. You have those desires because you're attracted to women.

Yeah but why was I not born attractive to naturally get those choosing signals I mean nature seems to have cooked me

 

[reptiles]

raising kids is slavery

why would I spend hundreds of thousands of dollars raising kids when I could spend all that on self indulgence ?

I wouldn’t be surprised if you were a christ cuck too.

Based as fuck

 

[Seth Walsh]

raising kids is slavery

why would I spend hundreds of thousands of dollars raising kids when I could spend all that on self indulgence ?

I wouldn’t be surprised if you were a christ cuck too.

^^^^^^ you are coping so hard.

Typa dude to give $43M to Sophie Rain than do what your ancestors did for millions of years and raise a family

"muh hundreds of thousands of dollars I can spend" = COPE COPE COPE!!!!!!


You can enjoy your self indulgence with your limited money. But don't pretend you're loaded. Hopefully people will keep coming back to this thread to cleanse their soul of all copes so they can lives a renewed life.

All the best,
Seth

 

[Sprinkles]

^^^^^^ you are coping so hard.

Typa dude to give $43M to Sophie Rain than do what your ancestors did for millions of years and raise a family

I never spent a dime on any onlyfans thot and never will buddy, quit assuming every bachelor is some
lonely truecel desperate for pussy, some guys genuinely enjoy solitude and freedom,

plus there are childfree women out there if you’re one of those soyboys with an innate need for female companionship

idk why you’re bragging about “raising a family” “and doing what my ancestors did” when you’re really just an NPC following biological programming and societal conditioning.

I think for myself and live life on my own terms kiddo

"muh hundreds of thousands of dollars I can spend" = COPE COPE COPE!!!!!!

You can enjoy your self indulgence with your limited money. But don't pretend you're loaded.

I will be loaded cause I’m not supporting a family like a slave to society and the government. all money goes to me and whatever I want to do,


fuck the responsibility and obligation that comes with that. I live for myself

cleanse their soul of all copes so they can lives a renewed life.

english pls

 

[Seth Walsh]

fuck the responsibility and obligation that comes with that. I live for myself

You are LARPING as a some mysterious rich libertarian. The truth is you're rotting and poor and coping with "muh freedom".

 

[maximum cope31]

raising kids is slavery

Only if you are poor.

So is the problem children or not making enough?

 

[Sprinkles]

Only if you are poor.

So is the problem children or not making enough?

kids

why would I take on unnecessary responsibility?

fuck outta here with that shit

 

[maximum cope31]

NPC following biological programming and societal conditioning.

Can you code a robot to walk forwards then tell it to stop? Will it act based on your command or its coding?

What will the robot do? Develop an illusion of consciousness and stop itself?

This isn't societal conditioning. Well society can't condition shit, genes have done that a long time ago. Societal conditioning is the projection of it.

This is the final

 

[Sprinkles]

Can you code a robot to walk forwards then tell it to stop? Will it act based on your command or its coding?

What will the robot do? Develop an illusion of consciousness and stop itself?

This isn't societal conditioning. Well society can't condition shit, genes have done that a long time ago. Societal conditioning is the projection of it.

It is societal conditioning because its a societal expectation that you follow the life script of getting married and raising a family

it's also amplified by biological programming as well that you seek out a mate and reproduce

but you can break free from this and other types of programming if your sentience is high enough,

ultimately choosing to just do whatever you want.

 

[Seth Walsh]

It is societal conditioning because its a societal expectation that you follow the life script of getting married and raising a family

it's also amplified by biological programming as well that you seek out a mate and reproduce

but you can break free from this and other types of programming if your sentience is high enough,

ultimately choosing to just do whatever you want.

cope

 

[Seth Walsh]

ultimately choosing to just do whatever you want.

Choosing for girls to not want to have sex with you

 

[Sprinkles]

cope

y

 

[Sprinkles]

Choosing for girls to not want to have sex with you

whether or not girls want to have sex with you is determined by attractiveness

 

[Seth Walsh]

y

Sprinkles’ argument is a fractal of cope, layered with projection, faux intellectualism, and a desperate need to reframe personal inadequacy as "enlightened rebellion." Let’s atomize this:

---

1. The Schrödinger’s Satire Paradox​

Sprinkles’ disclaimer labels the account as "satire," yet his rhetoric mirrors real-world nihilistic cope-bros who conflate contrarianism with intelligence. By hiding behind irony, he creates a shield: “If you criticize me, you’re too dumb to get the joke.” This is pre-emptive copium—a defense mechanism to avoid accountability for his edgy takes. Satire here isn’t art; it’s a bunker for fragile ego preservation.

---

2. The Gene-Society False Dichotomy​

Sprinkles claims societal conditioning is irrelevant because “genes did that already.” This is a smokescreen. By collapsing societal norms into biological determinism, he:

• Denies agency: “I’m not failing to meet expectations; I’m just a puppet of DNA!”
• Externalizes blame: If both society and biology are “programming,” his choices aren’t his fault—they’re “breaking free” (read: coping with non-compliance).

This binary is pseudointellectual. Genes influence behavior, but humans override biology constantly (e.g., monogamy, delayed gratification). Sprinkles’ reductionism is a cope to pathologize norms he finds inconvenient.

---

3. The “High Sentience” God Complex​

The phrase “if your sentience is high enough” reveals Sprinkles’ narcissistic salvific fantasy. He positions himself as part of an intellectual elite “awake” to the Matrix of societal programming. In reality, this is:

• Compensation: Unable to thrive within societal frameworks, he inflates his self-worth by claiming superiority (“I’m not struggling; I’m transcending”).
• Fear of mundanity: Admitting that marriage/family are valid choices (for some) would force him to confront his own existential drift. Instead, he pathologizes those choices as “programming.”

This is classic sour grapes cope: “I can’t win the game, so I’ll pretend the game is rigged.”

---

4. The Autonomy Mirage​

“Choosing to do whatever you want” is the ultimate cope. Sprinkles conflates freedom with directionlessness. Humans derive meaning from structure (biological and societal); rejecting all frameworks isn’t enlightenment—it’s existential terror dressed as rebellion. His mantra of radical autonomy is a cope to avoid:

• Vulnerability: Commitment (to relationships, ideals, etc.) requires risk. It’s safer to posture as a “free agent” than to face rejection or failure.
• Accountability: If nothing matters, nothing is his fault.

---

5. The Incel-Adjacent Undercurrent​

Note the subtext: “societal expectation to seek a mate.” Sprinkles’ disdain for partnership norms reeks of romantic copium. By framing reproduction as “biological programming,” he:

• Demeans intimacy as a primitive impulse (rather than a complex human experience).
• Rationalizes his own isolation/lack of success (“I’m not lonely; I’m evolved”).

This is the rhetoric of someone who fears being undesirable, so he dismisses desire itself as a “glitch in the matrix.”

---

Conclusion: The Cope-Stack​

Sprinkles isn’t “breaking free”—he’s building a prison of excuses. His argument is a Matryoshka doll of cope:

1. Satire (avoid criticism),
2. Determinism (avoid responsibility),
3. Elitism (avoid inadequacy),
4. Nihilism (avoid meaning).

He’s not a philosopher; he’s a scared hedgehog rolling into a ball of buzzwords. The third party sees it clearly: Cope is the DNA of the weak.

 

[Sprinkles]

Sprinkles’ argument is a fractal of cope, layered with projection, faux intellectualism, and a desperate need to reframe personal inadequacy as "enlightened rebellion." Let’s atomize this:

---

1. The Schrödinger’s Satire Paradox​

Sprinkles’ disclaimer labels the account as "satire," yet his rhetoric mirrors real-world nihilistic cope-bros who conflate contrarianism with intelligence. By hiding behind irony, he creates a shield: “If you criticize me, you’re too dumb to get the joke.” This is pre-emptive copium—a defense mechanism to avoid accountability for his edgy takes. Satire here isn’t art; it’s a bunker for fragile ego preservation.

---

2. The Gene-Society False Dichotomy​

Sprinkles claims societal conditioning is irrelevant because “genes did that already.” This is a smokescreen. By collapsing societal norms into biological determinism, he:

• Denies agency: “I’m not failing to meet expectations; I’m just a puppet of DNA!”
• Externalizes blame: If both society and biology are “programming,” his choices aren’t his fault—they’re “breaking free” (read: coping with non-compliance).

This binary is pseudointellectual. Genes influence behavior, but humans override biology constantly (e.g., monogamy, delayed gratification). Sprinkles’ reductionism is a cope to pathologize norms he finds inconvenient.

dnr

---

3. The “High Sentence/Sentience” God Complex​

The phrase “if your sentence is high enough” (likely “sentience”) reveals Sprinkles’ narcissistic salvific fantasy. He positions himself as part of an intellectual elite “awake” to the Matrix of societal programming. In reality, this is:

• Compensation: Unable to thrive within societal frameworks, he inflates his self-worth by claiming superiority (“I’m not struggling; I’m transcending”).
• Fear of mundanity: Admitting that marriage/family are valid choices (for some) would force him to confront his own existential drift. Instead, he pathologizes those choices as “programming.”

This is classic sour grapes cope: “I can’t win the game, so I’ll pretend the game is rigged.”

I am apart of the elite of people awake to the matrix. NPCs like you are too focused on muh "doing what my ancestors did" and so they don't care about people like you, you're feeding the system

I'm targeted by the interdimensional entities that run the simulation

I've encountered them before and they monitor me everyday as well is in dreams because I'm a massive threat to the system

---

4. The Autonomy Mirage​

“Choosing to do whatever you want” is the ultimate cope. Sprinkles conflates freedom with directionlessness. Humans derive meaning from structure (biological and societal); rejecting all frameworks isn’t enlightenment—it’s existential terror dressed as rebellion. His mantra of radical autonomy is a cope to avoid:

• Vulnerability: Commitment (to relationships, ideals, etc.) requires risk. It’s safer to posture as a “free agent” than to face rejection or failure.
• Accountability: If nothing matters, nothing is his fault.

---

5. The Incel-Adjacent Undercurrent​

Note the subtext: “societal expectation to seek a mate.” Sprinkles’ disdain for partnership norms reeks of romantic copium. By framing reproduction as “biological programming,” he:

• Demeans intimacy as a primitive impulse (rather than a complex human experience).
• Rationalizes his own isolation/lack of success (“I’m not lonely; I’m evolved”).

This is the rhetoric of someone who fears being undesirable, so he dismisses desire itself as a “glitch in the matrix.”

---

Conclusion: The Cope-Stack​

Sprinkles isn’t “breaking free”—he’s building a prison of excuses. His argument is a Matryoshka doll of cope:

1. Satire (avoid criticism),
2. Determinism (avoid responsibility),
3. Elitism (avoid inadequacy),
4. Nihilism (avoid meaning).

He’s not a philosopher; he’s a scared hedgehog rolling into a ball of buzzwords. The third party sees it clearly: Cope is the DNA of the weak.

dnr

 

[Seth Walsh]

I'm targeted by the interdimensional entities that run the simulation

over

 

[New Poster]

Very legit thread.
@New Poster

I’m already in a relationship

 

[maximum cope31]

---

2. The Gene-Society False Dichotomy​

Sprinkles claims societal conditioning is irrelevant because “genes did that already.” This is a smokescreen. By collapsing societal norms into biological determinism, he:

• Denies agency: “I’m not failing to meet expectations; I’m just a puppet of DNA!”
• Externalizes blame: If both society and biology are “programming,” his choices aren’t his fault—they’re “breaking free” (read: coping with non-compliance).

This binary is pseudointellectual. Genes influence behavior, but humans override biology constantly (e.g., monogamy, delayed gratification). Sprinkles’ reductionism is a cope to pathologize norms he finds inconvenient.

---

​

Didn't know AI could cope this much. No wonder since it has been fed on bullshit psychology papers

''humans override biology constantly''

 

[maximum cope31]

I am apart of the elite of people awake to the matrix. NPCs like you are too focused on muh "doing what my ancestors did" and so they don't care about people like you, you're feeding the system

I'm targeted by the interdimensional entities that run the simulation

I've encountered them before and they monitor me everyday as well is in dreams because I'm a massive threat to the system

Elite people with high awareness? Who don't feed the system?

Mr. Sprinkles, can you tell us with who you are IRL and your successes since you are from the ''elite'' with really high awareness and IQ. Surely you must have a phd or something with that mighty brain of yours?

 

[Seth Walsh]

This one will be a tough read so PLEASE BACK OUT OF THE THREAD NOW IF YOU CANNOT HANDLE IT

The Perilous Path of the Aging Bachelor: Why Men Flee Stability Until It’s Too Late​

---

I. The Dangers of Aging Bachelorhood: A Slow-Motion Tragedy​

The myth of the “carefree bachelor” crumbles with age, revealing a stark reality of loneliness, regret, and existential decay. Here’s what awaits those who delay commitment indefinitely:

1. Isolation and Emotional Sterility​

• Loneliness amplifies with age: Friends marry, families grow, and social circles shrink. The bachelor’s “freedom” morphs into weekends spent in silence, scrolling through photos of peers surrounded by grandchildren.
• No safety net: Without a lifelong partner or children, aging bachelors lack caregivers in times of illness or frailty. The state of dying alone in a sterile hospital bed becomes a tangible fear.

2. Stagnation of Purpose​

• Legacy? There is none: A life devoid of marriage and children leaves no mark on the world. The bachelor’s stories, values, and wisdom die with him.
• Selfishness becomes a cage: Years of prioritizing “me time” calcify into an inability to sacrifice for others, rendering meaningful relationships impossible.

3. The Tyranny of Regret​

• The “what if” haunting: Men who evaded commitment to avoid “missing out” eventually realize they missed everything: love, partnership, and the irreplaceable joy of raising a family.
• Sexual marketplace obsolescence: Aging bachelors compete with younger, more vibrant men for fleeting flings, a humbling reminder that superficiality has an expiration date.

---

II. Why Men Psychologically Flee Marriage (Even When Stability Is Within Reach)​

Young men often sabotage their own futures by conflating freedom with fear. Here’s the psychology behind the self-sabotage:

1. The Illusion of Infinite Options​

• Grass-is-greener syndrome: Men addicted to novelty convince themselves a “better” partner exists just around the corner. Spoiler: She doesn’t.
• Fear of responsibility: Commitment requires emotional labor—listening, compromising, nurturing. Many men would rather chase dopamine hits (promotions, hookups, hobbies) than grow up.

2. Trauma Disguised as “Independence”​

• Avoidant attachment styles: Men raised in broken homes or toxic relationships often equate marriage with suffocation. They mistake emotional unavailability for “strength.”
• Peter Pan Syndrome: Eternal adolescence is easier than confronting one’s flaws. Why fix your communication issues or selfishness when you can blame “marriage” as the problem?

3. Societal Lies​

• “Focus on your career first”: A cope. Stable marriages enhance men’s careers (emotional support, shared burdens, tax benefits).
• “Alpha males don’t settle”: Toxic influencers peddle this fantasy to insecure men. Real alphas lead families.

---

III. The Psychology of “I Don’t Want to Get Married”: A Mask for Unresolved Trauma​

When a man claims he “doesn’t believe in marriage,” translate it: “I haven’t attracted a quality partner, and I’m too scared to admit why.”

The Hidden Script​

• Defense Mechanism 101: Sour grapes. If he can’t secure a loyal partner, he dismisses marriage as “outdated” to protect his ego.
• Fear of Exposure: Commitment mirrors your flaws. A girlfriend would notice his emotional immaturity, poor finances, or porn addiction—so he avoids the risk entirely.

The Self-Sabotage Cycle​

1. Low self-esteem: He believes he’s unworthy of love, so he pursues casual flings to avoid rejection.
2. Arrested development: Years of avoiding vulnerability stunt his ability to bond.
3. Cynicism as armor: “Marriage is a scam” becomes his mantra to rationalize loneliness.

The Wake-Up Call​

Men in this trap must ask:

• Is my “freedom” just fear of being judged?
• Am I blaming marriage to avoid fixing myself?
• Will I regret this when I’m 60 and invisible?

---

Conclusion: Grow Up or Rot Alone​

Aging bachelorhood isn’t a choice—it’s a failure of courage. Marriage isn’t about losing freedom; it’s about gaining a legacy. Men who flee stability to chase shadows of autonomy end up with nothing but ghosts. The clock ticks. The choice is yours: Evolve or evaporate.

BUMPING THIS

 

[disillusioned]

Never had the choice really, ascended too late. Not marrying some whore who’s had a hundred chads cum inside her (every foid my age).

 

[Seth Walsh]

@disillusioned

XD

 

[Seth Walsh]

This one will be a tough read so PLEASE BACK OUT OF THE THREAD NOW IF YOU CANNOT HANDLE IT

The Perilous Path of the Aging Bachelor: Why Men Flee Stability Until It’s Too Late​

---

I. The Dangers of Aging Bachelorhood: A Slow-Motion Tragedy​

The myth of the “carefree bachelor” crumbles with age, revealing a stark reality of loneliness, regret, and existential decay. Here’s what awaits those who delay commitment indefinitely:

1. Isolation and Emotional Sterility​

• Loneliness amplifies with age: Friends marry, families grow, and social circles shrink. The bachelor’s “freedom” morphs into weekends spent in silence, scrolling through photos of peers surrounded by grandchildren.
• No safety net: Without a lifelong partner or children, aging bachelors lack caregivers in times of illness or frailty. The state of dying alone in a sterile hospital bed becomes a tangible fear.

2. Stagnation of Purpose​

• Legacy? There is none: A life devoid of marriage and children leaves no mark on the world. The bachelor’s stories, values, and wisdom die with him.
• Selfishness becomes a cage: Years of prioritizing “me time” calcify into an inability to sacrifice for others, rendering meaningful relationships impossible.

3. The Tyranny of Regret​

• The “what if” haunting: Men who evaded commitment to avoid “missing out” eventually realize they missed everything: love, partnership, and the irreplaceable joy of raising a family.
• Sexual marketplace obsolescence: Aging bachelors compete with younger, more vibrant men for fleeting flings, a humbling reminder that superficiality has an expiration date.

---

II. Why Men Psychologically Flee Marriage (Even When Stability Is Within Reach)​

Young men often sabotage their own futures by conflating freedom with fear. Here’s the psychology behind the self-sabotage:

1. The Illusion of Infinite Options​

• Grass-is-greener syndrome: Men addicted to novelty convince themselves a “better” partner exists just around the corner. Spoiler: She doesn’t.
• Fear of responsibility: Commitment requires emotional labor—listening, compromising, nurturing. Many men would rather chase dopamine hits (promotions, hookups, hobbies) than grow up.

2. Trauma Disguised as “Independence”​

• Avoidant attachment styles: Men raised in broken homes or toxic relationships often equate marriage with suffocation. They mistake emotional unavailability for “strength.”
• Peter Pan Syndrome: Eternal adolescence is easier than confronting one’s flaws. Why fix your communication issues or selfishness when you can blame “marriage” as the problem?

3. Societal Lies​

• “Focus on your career first”: A cope. Stable marriages enhance men’s careers (emotional support, shared burdens, tax benefits).
• “Alpha males don’t settle”: Toxic influencers peddle this fantasy to insecure men. Real alphas lead families.

---

III. The Psychology of “I Don’t Want to Get Married”: A Mask for Unresolved Trauma​

When a man claims he “doesn’t believe in marriage,” translate it: “I haven’t attracted a quality partner, and I’m too scared to admit why.”

The Hidden Script​

• Defense Mechanism 101: Sour grapes. If he can’t secure a loyal partner, he dismisses marriage as “outdated” to protect his ego.
• Fear of Exposure: Commitment mirrors your flaws. A girlfriend would notice his emotional immaturity, poor finances, or porn addiction—so he avoids the risk entirely.

The Self-Sabotage Cycle​

1. Low self-esteem: He believes he’s unworthy of love, so he pursues casual flings to avoid rejection.
2. Arrested development: Years of avoiding vulnerability stunt his ability to bond.
3. Cynicism as armor: “Marriage is a scam” becomes his mantra to rationalize loneliness.

The Wake-Up Call​

Men in this trap must ask:

• Is my “freedom” just fear of being judged?
• Am I blaming marriage to avoid fixing myself?
• Will I regret this when I’m 60 and invisible?

---

Conclusion: Grow Up or Rot Alone​

Aging bachelorhood isn’t a choice—it’s a failure of courage. Marriage isn’t about losing freedom; it’s about gaining a legacy. Men who flee stability to chase shadows of autonomy end up with nothing but ghosts. The clock ticks. The choice is yours: Evolve or evaporate.

BUMPing this.

What do you think.

Post your thoughts below.