20yo Rate me + improvements ( Soft & hardmaxxing )

scherba

scherba

Iron
Joined
Sep 2, 2024
Posts
169
Reputation
84
IMG 1128
IMG 1013
IMG 1010
IMG 1011
 
LMTN
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aloof
LMTN
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba and Aloof
1777913794572
1777913802644

Brutal skulpill
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gonzalol
Why his face so wide bro? Masseters or what?
Overly wide skull
His cheekbones are overly projected too, not just his masatters or gonions
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gonzalol
Low cheekbones ug
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba
Overly wide skull
His cheekbones are overly projected too, not just his masatters or gonions
Yh and low cheekbones if they were higher..
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba and Topkra
Shouldn’t the

shouldn’t the mandible be wider too? Look like an alien morphed
Well to get the diamond shape Zygos width hace to be wider than gonions
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba
Shouldn’t the

shouldn’t the mandible be wider too? Look like an alien morphed
Looks way better than your current self anyways
Altough i am pretty sure this is achieable via surgery
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gonzalol
Got mtn a year ago did I descend?
its understandable why you got mtn because you have good bones but in the second pic the pfl its the biggest problem, the triangles too, and the midface looks long even if is good because of the eyes
 
its understandable why you got mtn because you have good bones but in the second pic the pfl its the biggest problem, the triangles too, and the midface looks long even if is good because of the eyes
His eye area its not the main problem
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba
Overdeveloped zygos or underdeveloped mandible?
You have very projected cheekbones but theyre low set, unideal.
Also ur roman nose suits very goodd on you. One of the best Roman noses I ve seen, reminda me of this lightskin guy(I dont remember his name)
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba
Also dont cheekbite, it looks very bad
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba
You have very projected cheekbones but theyre low set, unideal.
Also ur roman nose suits very goodd on you. One of the best Roman noses I ve seen, reminda me of this lightskin guy(I dont remember his name)
Preciate u women also kinda dig it. fillers or implants would make it worse right
 
Preciate u women also kinda dig it. fillers or implants would make it worse right
Mmm Idk about surgery but im sure you could if u have the money fs. You are too close but yet so far
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba
Mmm Idk about surgery but im sure you could if u have the money fs. You are too close but yet so far
Money wouldn’t be the problem the key would be for me to find out where to get fillers or implants…
 
I agree but I actually don’t it’s mostly the lighting I would argue
Well in the 1st picture is legit cuz u have lighting from behind
But second one makes it so obv because you have loght in ur face. I fraud little bit my hollow cheek also but as I have mid-slightly high cheekbones isnt very obv or bad looking
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0257.jpeg
    IMG_0257.jpeg
    462.9 KB · Views: 0
Well in the 1st picture is legit cuz u have lighting from behind
But second one makes it so obv because you have loght in ur face. I fraud little bit my hollow cheek also but as I have mid-slightly high cheekbones isnt very obv or bad looking
Oh aight got it! Mirin btw ever thought about lip filler? Would ascend you a lot I believe
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gonzalol
Oh aight got it! Mirin btw ever thought about lip filler? Would ascend you a lot I believe
Yh, but I m afraid of something going bad and having to life with it.
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba
Well in the 1st picture is legit cuz u have lighting from behind
But second one makes it so obv because you have loght in ur face. I fraud little bit my hollow cheek also but as I have mid-slightly high cheekbones isnt very obv or bad looking
IMG 1135
This is where cheekbone setting is measured right
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba
  • +1
Reactions: scherba
View attachment 5007441This is where cheekbone setting is measured right
Take the distance in px from Upper lio to the byzigomatic(The line u put) (I will call it X) and from Upper lip make another line to the IPD(this line will be Y)
Now do X/Y * 100

And compare to this
CHEEKBONES HIGH SETEDNESS
(Tier 1) ≥81%
(Tier 2) 80%-76%
(Tier 3) 75%-70%
(Tier 4) 69%-66%
(Tier 5) 65%-60%
(Tier 6) 59%-56%
(Tier 7) <56%
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba
I think u eill get like t4 maybe
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba
Below 70% is considered low set
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba
Take the distance in px from Upper lio to the byzigomatic(The line u put) (I will call it X) and from Upper lip make another line to the IPD(this line will be Y)
Now do X/Y * 100

And compare to this
CHEEKBONES HIGH SETEDNESS
(Tier 1) ≥81%
(Tier 2) 80%-76%
(Tier 3) 75%-70%
(Tier 4) 69%-66%
(Tier 5) 65%-60%
(Tier 6) 59%-56%
(Tier 7) <56%

IMG 1016
Like this?
 
The setedness of yours arevery unideal. Thats why ur skull instead of looking like a Cross ✝️. Loos more like a ➕
 
  • +1
Reactions: scherba
Yh.. Kinda. Now Take the legnth of the black line from the black line until it meets the red line and divide it by the total lenght of the black line

The setedness of yours arevery unideal. Thats why ur skull instead of looking like a Cross ✝️. Loos more like a ➕
Aight yeah true thanks, but I would need to measure in cm no?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gonzalol
  • +1
Reactions: scherba

Similar threads

ubhh
Replies
11
Views
90
andy9432
andy9432
M
Replies
4
Views
51
zzr
zzr
C
Replies
11
Views
152
160cmcurry
160cmcurry
max25
Replies
6
Views
63
Subhuman
Subhuman
morsdelongee
Replies
11
Views
69
morsdelongee
morsdelongee

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top