38 Most important facial ratios and the ideal measurements (HIGH EFFORT)

[Feliezzx]

These are all the facial ratios that matter including some of the ones in the BOTB thread + the ones he didn't include.​

Note: This is not a guide on how to measure these ratios (You can search for that yourself since I'm too lazy)

Color coding:
RED- Extremely Important
BLUE- Really Important
Green- Important
White- Not That Important

1. Gonial angle: 112-123 degrees​
2. Facial thirds: 29.5-36.5​
3. Eye separation ratio: 44.3-47.4​
4. Total facial convexity angle: 137.5-148.5 degrees​
5. Facial convexity angle: 168-176 degrees​
6. Cheekbone position: 81-100%​
7. Jaw frontal angle: 84.5-95 degrees​
8. Mandibular plane angle: 15-22 degrees​
9. (Palperable axis) Canthal Tilt: 5.2-8.5 degrees​
10. Ramus to mandible ratio: 0.59-0.78​
11. FWHR: 1.9-2.06​
12. Total FWHR: 1.33-1.38​
13. Submental cervical angle: 91-110 degrees​
14. Nasofrontal angle: 106-129 degrees​
15. Eye spacing: 0.93-1.04​
16. Upper to lower lip ratio: 1.4-2​
17. Nasofacial angle: 30-36 degrees​
18. Eyebrow position: 0-0.65​
19. Chin to philtrum: 2.05-2.55​
20. Nasolabial angle: 94-117 degrees​
21. Nasal projection: 0.55-0.68​
22. Nasal width to height ratio: 0.62-0.88​
23. Nose width to mouth width: 1.38-1.53​
24. (eye width to height ratio)Eye aspect ratio: 2.8-3.6​
25. Midface ratio: 0.93-1.01​
26. Neck width: 90-100%​
27. Recession relative to Frankfurt plane: none​
28. Bigonial width: 85.5-92%​
29. Medial canthal angle: 20.42 degrees​
30. Nasomental angle: 125-132 degrees​
31. Orbital vector: Positive​
32. Nasal tip angle: 112-125 degrees​
33. Gonion to mouth relationship: Gonion below mouth​
34. Mentolabial angle: 108-130 degrees​
35. Eyebrow tilt: 5-13 degrees​
36. Brow ridge inclination: 13-24 degrees​
37. Lower facial proportion: 30.6-34​
38. Bitemporal width: 84-95%​

 

[thecel]

Some of the ratios you listed aren’t ideal.

This guy doesn’t have every ratio of his inside your “ideal” ranges:

His midface ratio is 1.167, and @looksmaxprofile finds it to be a tad too long.

Maybe I'm biased but the midface looks too long

…at 1.167.

1. Midface ratio: 0.93-1.01​

0.93 is fucking horse-tier.

1. Chin to philtrum: 2.05-2.55​

His chin-to-philtrum ratio is 3.218 and mogs.

 

[Feliezzx]

@sub4 iranicel Tag some people please

 

[testicularatrophy]

ideal alot but still subhuman, only matters if you are already good looking

 

[Blackgymmax]

Good thread

 

[Tai Lung]

good ratio - looking good, bad ratio - looking bad

 

[blackout_96_]

Gonial angle doesn't matter unless it's too small

 

[Feliezzx]

Gonial angle doesn't matter unless it's too small

Many other ratios are dependent on gonial angle such as chin to philtrum that's why its important
Standalone, not so much but there is an interdependency

 

[Feliezzx]

Gonial angle doesn't matter unless it's too small

Many other ratios are dependent on gonial angle such as chin to philtrum that's why its important
Standalone, not so much but there is an interdependency

These are all the facial ratios that matter including some of the ones in the BOTB thread + the ones he didn't include.​

Note: This is not a guide on how to measure these ratios (You can search for that yourself since I'm too lazy)

Color coding:
RED- Extremely Important
BLUE- Really Important
Green- Important
White- Not That Important

1. Gonial angle: 112-123 degrees​
2. Facial thirds: 29.5-36.5​
3. Eye separation ratio: 44.3-47.4​
4. Total facial convexity angle: 137.5-148.5 degrees​
5. Facial convexity angle: 168-176 degrees​
6. Cheekbone position: 81-100%​
7. Jaw frontal angle: 84.5-95 degrees​
8. Mandibular plane angle: 15-22 degrees​
9. (Palperable axis) Canthal Tilt: 5.2-8.5 degrees​
10. Ramus to mandible ratio: 0.59-0.78​
11. FWHR: 1.9-2.06​
12. Total FWHR: 1.33-1.38​
13. Submental cervical angle: 91-110 degrees​
14. Nasofrontal angle: 106-129 degrees​
15. Eye spacing: 0.93-1.04​
16. Upper to lower lip ratio: 1.4-2​
17. Nasofacial angle: 30-36 degrees​
18. Eyebrow position: 0-0.65​
19. Chin to philtrum: 2.05-2.55​
20. Nasolabial angle: 94-117 degrees​
21. Nasal projection: 0.55-0.68​
22. Nasal width to height ratio: 0.62-0.88​
23. Nose width to mouth width: 1.38-1.53​
24. (eye width to height ratio)Eye aspect ratio: 2.8-3.6​
25. Midface ratio: 0.93-1.01​
26. Neck width: 90-100%​
27. Recession relative to Frankfurt plane: none​
28. Bigonial width: 85.5-92%​
29. Medial canthal angle: 20.42 degrees​
30. Nasomental angle: 125-132 degrees​
31. Orbital vector: Positive​
32. Nasal tip angle: 112-125 degrees​
33. Gonion to mouth relationship: Gonion below mouth​
34. Mentolabial angle: 108-130 degrees​
35. Eyebrow tilt: 5-13 degrees​
36. Brow ridge inclination: 13-24 degrees​
37. Lower facial proportion: 30.6-34​
38. Bitemporal width: 84-95%​

Another thing to mention is that if your red, blue and some green ratios are perfect then most if not all of your other ratios would also be good

 

[Feliezzx]

0.93 is fucking horse-tier.

Not a longer midface, but a wider eye spacing

 

[Deleted member 57356]

@sub4 iranicel Tag some people please

ok babe
@Christiano @PseudoMaxxer @5.5psl @SexuallyAbusive @bootydestroyer333

 

[Deleted member 57356]

color coding is inaccurate

 

[Feliezzx]

color coding is inaccurate

Yeah it might seem like that but most of the other ratios are dependent on the red and blue ones

 

[Feliezzx]

Bump

 

[Crimson]

These are all the facial ratios that matter including some of the ones in the BOTB thread + the ones he didn't include.​

Note: This is not a guide on how to measure these ratios (You can search for that yourself since I'm too lazy)

Color coding:
RED- Extremely Important
BLUE- Really Important
Green- Important
White- Not That Important

1. Gonial angle: 112-123 degrees​
2. Facial thirds: 29.5-36.5​
3. Eye separation ratio: 44.3-47.4​
4. Total facial convexity angle: 137.5-148.5 degrees​
5. Facial convexity angle: 168-176 degrees​
6. Cheekbone position: 81-100%​
7. Jaw frontal angle: 84.5-95 degrees​
8. Mandibular plane angle: 15-22 degrees​
9. (Palperable axis) Canthal Tilt: 5.2-8.5 degrees​
10. Ramus to mandible ratio: 0.59-0.78​
11. FWHR: 1.9-2.06​
12. Total FWHR: 1.33-1.38​
13. Submental cervical angle: 91-110 degrees​
14. Nasofrontal angle: 106-129 degrees​
15. Eye spacing: 0.93-1.04​
16. Upper to lower lip ratio: 1.4-2​
17. Nasofacial angle: 30-36 degrees​
18. Eyebrow position: 0-0.65​
19. Chin to philtrum: 2.05-2.55​
20. Nasolabial angle: 94-117 degrees​
21. Nasal projection: 0.55-0.68​
22. Nasal width to height ratio: 0.62-0.88​
23. Nose width to mouth width: 1.38-1.53​
24. (eye width to height ratio)Eye aspect ratio: 2.8-3.6​
25. Midface ratio: 0.93-1.01​
26. Neck width: 90-100%​
27. Recession relative to Frankfurt plane: none​
28. Bigonial width: 85.5-92%​
29. Medial canthal angle: 20.42 degrees​
30. Nasomental angle: 125-132 degrees​
31. Orbital vector: Positive​
32. Nasal tip angle: 112-125 degrees​
33. Gonion to mouth relationship: Gonion below mouth​
34. Mentolabial angle: 108-130 degrees​
35. Eyebrow tilt: 5-13 degrees​
36. Brow ridge inclination: 13-24 degrees​
37. Lower facial proportion: 30.6-34​
38. Bitemporal width: 84-95%​

Good thread, Bookmarked

 

[Feliezzx]

Last bump before I let this thread rot in the archives

 

[mtcut3plush]

@looksmaxprofile finds it to be a tad too long.

just because some schizophrenic retard SOMEHOW sees it long then there's something wrong with the ratios lmaooo

 

[mtcut3plush]

1. Facial thirds: 29.5-36.5​
2. ​

no wat facial thirds it 2nd in importance hahaha

 

[mtcut3plush]

1. Eyebrow tilt: 5-13 degrees​
2. ​

this should be in important

 

[Feliezzx]

this should be in important

No, its an independent eyebrow measurement which does not affect any other ratios, it can be changed and there are many attractive people with straight eyebrows

 

[mtcut3plush]

No, its an independent eyebrow measurement which does not affect any other ratios, it can be changed and there are many attractive people with straight eyebrows

only brad pitt but its definitely not just some small failo

 

[eow]

Eye separation ratio: 44.3

dnr after this

 

[eow]

dnr after this

op

 

[Feliezzx]

only brad pitt but its definitely not just some small failo

 

[mtcut3plush]

View attachment 2743317

he'd look much better with positive ones for sure

 

[Feliezzx]

View attachment 2743315
op

eow​

Iron​

Joined Feb 12, 2024 Posts 8 Reputation 1

 

[Feliezzx]

he'd look much better with positive ones for sure

Maybe, but it adds to his insane emotionless hunter eyes

 

[eow]

View attachment 2743322

eow​

Iron​

Joined Feb 12, 2024 Posts 8 Reputation 1

yeah you’re somerhalder keep coping by including your measurements in the ideals

 

[Feliezzx]

yeah you’re somerhalder keep coping by including your measurements in the ideals

I didn't make these measurements up nor is that my esr lil twink

 

[Deleted member 39692]

ratios are cope

 

[Feliezzx]

ratios are cope

There is no other objective way of quantifying beauty, and the ratios do make sense
They are common among all attractive people, even artists use some ratios like fwhr

 

[Deleted member 39692]

There is no other objective way of quantifying beauty, and the ratios do make sense
They are common among all attractive people, even artists use some ratios like fwhr

ye but there is something to humans that isnt measurable. A lot of people i find the most attractive dont have all perfect ratios, while many that are close to perfect etc i dont really like at all

 

[Feliezzx]

ye but there is something to humans that isnt measurable. A lot of people i find the most attractive dont have all perfect ratios, while many that are close to perfect etc i dont really like at all

Yeah I agree it isn't all about ratios but most attractive people do share them, a few ratios being slightly off doesn't matter but things like jaw width, fwhr and palperable axis are objectively attractive

 

[Feliezzx]

Ratios + Prominent features = mogger
Prominent features + No ratios = Ogre
Ratios + no prominent features = Prettyboy appeal (Like chico but he had insanely angular gonions)
No ratios + no prominent features = incel

 

[Blackgymmax]

ye but there is something to humans that isnt measurable. A lot of people i find the most attractive dont have all perfect ratios, while many that are close to perfect etc i dont really like at all

Good thing this subhuman deleted
Virtually every attractive chadbhas a 70%+ harmony score

 

[Blackgymmax]

Ratios + Prominent features = mogger
Prominent features + No ratios = Ogre
Ratios + no prominent features = Prettyboy appeal (Like chico but he had insanely angular gonions)
No ratios + no prominent features = incel

Ding ding dingggg

 

[mvp2v1]

Good thing this subhuman deleted
Virtually every attractive chadbhas a 70%+ harmony score

have you seen many of the AI images? If you ask it to make you almost any person in any context it will feed you an attractive person. And the facial structures of these people AI makes are all the same...

They all have ideal facial growth.

 

[Feliezzx]

have you seen many of the AI images? If you ask it to make you almost any person in any context it will feed you an attractive person. And the facial structures of these people AI makes are all the same...View attachment 2770587

They all have ideal facial growth.

Mogged by a fucking drawing its so over

 

[truecel12]

Some of the ratios you listed aren’t ideal.

This guy doesn’t have every ratio of his inside your “ideal” ranges:

View attachment 2738812

His midface ratio is 1.167, and @looksmaxprofile finds it to be a tad too long.


…at 1.167.



0.93 is fucking horse-tier.



His chin-to-philtrum ratio is 3.218 and mogs.

he looks frightening bro...
only slays youll get are from surgerywhores who care more about psl brainrot than you do