4/10 is the global average

[disillusioned]

At least 50-80% of all people are either 4 or 5 out of 10 in terms of appearance. 90% are within the 4-6 range. If you can make it to even just 7 then you are literally in the top 5%, and at 8 or higher in the top 1%. 9 or 10s are sub-1%.

The average person is literally unattractive. Especially if you take it into account that the majority of the human population actually lives in the third world where the average person is probably within the 3-4 range.

Jfl most people are sub-humans. Ugly is normal.

 

[Deleted member 2634]

 

[Deleted member 756]

 

[Deleted member 8165]

you need 9/10 to even match on tinder

 

[Deleted member 756]

you need 9/10 to even match on tinder

Cope

 

[Deleted member 8165]

Cope

my tinder is a deathbed

 

[disillusioned]

Cope

He's not wrong. Though 8/10 is probably closer to the reality. Which is still an extremely small portion of males. Social media has destroyed the ability of most males to compete. Within 10 years it won't be possible for sub-8 males to get anywhere. Maybe the 7s will infrequently get lucky, but not often.

 

[owlofathena]

 

[Deleted member 6723]

I dont understand u.

Average is 5/10, it should be 5/10, cant be 4/10.

 

[owlofathena]

 

[Deleted member 3073]

I dont understand u.

Average is 5/10, it should be 5/10, cant be 4/10.

10/10 doesn't exist

 

[Deleted member 9699]

you changed ur height in ur sig to 6' 3" from 6' 2"
did u grow bro?

 

[Deleted member 275]

rated 5PSL here and I get 3 matches/week.

So many bluepillers here that still believe you can get dates or sex if you are below 6PSL. JFL at u

 

[disillusioned]

Average is 5/10

You don't understand the difference between averages and the median. Say there are 10 guys in a room and all have 10$ except for one, who has 10k$. In that case, the "average" money owned per person in the room will be far higher than 10$, but that doesn't mean most of the guys in the room actually have more than 10$.

The X/10 scale is just a rating scale. Just because 5-6 is in the middle, that doesn't mean most humans actually ARE a 5 or 6. Most people are fours and fives. Aka, mediocre or worse.

 

[Deleted member 6723]

10/10 doesn't exist

I know 10/10 doesnt exist.

It should be like this

5/10 = average

What I think OP is trying to say is that the average of everyone globally is 4/10 in the west.

 

[Deleted member 3073]

You don't understand the difference between averages and the median. Say there are 10 guys in a room and all have 10$ except for one, who has 10k$. In that case, the "average" money owned per person in the room will be far higher than 10$, but that doesn't mean most of the guys in the room actually have more than 10$.

The X/10 scale is just a rating scale. Just because 5-6 is in the middle, that doesn't mean most humans actually ARE a 5 or 6. Most people are fours and fives. Aka, mediocre or worse.

high iq doomer

 

[Deleted member 756]

you changed ur height in ur sig to 6' 3" from 6' 2"
did u grow bro?

Yes

 

[TITUS]

Considering the third world comprises most of the world population, India and China being the main faces of the third world, i would say the average is more 2-3 by european standards. I rate ethnics low though, maybe im biased here.

 

[Deleted member 9699]

Yes

age?

 

[Deleted member 756]

age?

24

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

You don't understand the difference between averages and the median. Say there are 10 guys in a room and all have 10$ except for one, who has 10k$. In that case, the "average" money owned per person in the room will be far higher than 10$, but that doesn't mean most of the guys in the room actually have more than 10$.

The X/10 scale is just a rating scale. Just because 5-6 is in the middle, that doesn't mean most humans actually ARE a 5 or 6. Most people are fours and fives. Aka, mediocre or worse.

Human attractiveness follows a standard distribution though, which would put most people in the 4-6 range. If there were a few super attractive 9s and 10s and lots of 2s and 3s then it would drive the average up even though most people would still be closer to 4 like you say, but there is an even distribution of attractiveness both ways, with about half of people in the average range and an incredibly small percentage around 1 or 10. This is even confirmed when men rate women, their ratings follow a perfect standard distribution. Of course when women rate men it is heavily skewed but they dong understand the concept of average in the dating market so it doesnt matter

 

[Deleted member 6723]

You don't understand the difference between averages and the median. Say there are 10 guys in a room and all have 10$ except for one, who has 10k$. In that case, the "average" money owned per person in the room will be far higher than 10$, but that doesn't mean most of the guys in the room actually have more than 10$.

The X/10 scale is just a rating scale. Just because 5-6 is in the middle, that doesn't mean most humans actually ARE a 5 or 6. Most people are fours and fives. Aka, mediocre or worse.

ahh I understand that. What Im trying to say is what is the rating scale based on, something like that?

10/10 is max u cant improve it anymore.

For me 0/10 is impossible.

5/10 should be the most common as we need to specify what is 5/10 as you can literally put anyone anywhere (who are not 10/10) if u dont specify it as I said 0/10 is impossible.

5/10 globally is like 3-4/10 in the west.

 

[disillusioned]

Human attractiveness follows a standard distribution

No, it follows a power law. Looks are just like money: A small number have huge amounts of it, and almost everyone else is dirt poor, or at best, merely not struggling.

 

[SkinjobCatastrophe]

No, it follows a power law. Looks are just like money: A small number have huge amounts of it, and almost everyone else is dirt poor, or at best, merely not struggling.

Where is the evidence? Mens sexual market value does follow that power law but human attractiveness does not, there is just no evidence that it does, and there is plenty of evidence that it follows a standard distribution

 

[godsmistake]

10/2 = 4 indeed

 

[Enfant terrible]

Its true 7/10 average slayer

 

[Deleted member 756]

my tinder is a deathbed

And? You’re not 4/10 then

 

[Deleted member 275]

4/10 is the global average for men. 5/10 is the global average for women due to pussy privilege.