5 features that separate ethnics.

[unstable]

The ANGLOS are stronger right now, but the FRENCH were stronger back than, FRENCH WAS THE INTERNATIONAL language pre WW2, and plus the ELITE ANGLOS have French / Norman ancestry, so here's that, and ENGLISH is 60% French.

60% of french in english is not commonly used. mostly in rare scenarios. for everyday english it is maybe 20%.

and normans were ethnic Scandinavians who spoke french.

also french were never stronger than english, horatio nelson sank the french fleet at their supposed prime.

french don't deserve to be seen in same light as english.

 

[whiteegyptian]

60% of french in english is not commonly used. mostly in rare scenarios. for everyday english it is maybe 20%.

and normans were ethnically Scandinavians who spoke french.

also french were never stronger than english, horatio nelson sank the french fleet at their supposed prime.

french don't deserve to be seen in same light as english.

The Normans were originally SCANDINAVIAN yes, but they mixed with the CELTIC inhabitants of France, and the MODERN FRENCH population is Celto-Germanic (either from the Franks, Burgundians or Normans), I DON'T see what's hard to understand about this, about the first one, that's not TRUE, you would know if you spoke both French and ENGLISH like I DO.

and the FRENCH raped the English multiple times, regardless:

Anglo-French War (1778–1783) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[unstable]

The Normans were originally SCANDINAVIAN yes, but they mixed with the CELTIC inhabitants of France, and the MODERN FRENCH population is Celto-Germanic (either from Franks, Burgundians or Normans), I DON'T see what's hard to understand about this, about the first one, that's not TRUE, you would know if you spoke both French and ENGLISH like I DO.

and the FRENCH raped the English multiple times, regardless:

Anglo-French War (1778–1783) - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

won multiples times just to be overshadowed by anglos in the end, during the 100 years war english held french territory for 100 years.
french were never stronger than english they were destined to be lower than english.

french couldn't even match anglos after copying industrialization from them it shows how superior english were.

 

[whiteegyptian]

won multiples times just to be overshadowed by anglos in the end, during the 100 years war english held french territory for 100 years.
french were never stronger than english they were destined to be lower than english.

french couldn't even match anglos after copying industrializing from them it shows how superior english were.

I didn't say the FRENCH are stronger right now, plus the FRENCH dominated for a good while, until the ANGLOS were AMPED after WW2 through the USA, FRENCH STILL won the hundred years WAR, and the FRENCH are not famous for industrializing anyway, though they have the best weapons now right after the USA.

 

[unstable]

I didn't say the FRENCH are stronger right now, plus the FRENCH dominated for a good while, until the ANGLOS were AMPED after WW2 through the USA, FRENCH STILL won the hundred years WAR, and the FRENCH are not famous for industrializing anyway, though they have the best weapons now right after the USA.

french are not stronger right now nor were they ever for a long period.
100 year war was won but english had already been ruling their asses for a century by then
best weapons because anglos let them have them and those are useless too.
not famous because their innovation capability is lower.

 

[whiteegyptian]

french are not stronger right now nor were they ever for a long period.
100 year war was won but english had already been ruling their asses for a century by then
best weapons because anglos let them have them and those are useless too.
not famous because their innovation capability is lower.

just be the international language, dominant power of 18th-20th century theory. and my guy the english werent ruling themselves for most of their history, let alone ruling french, and again france is only western country that is not anglo to have autonomy, not cuz anglos let them have em.

 

[unstable]

just be the international language, dominant power of 18th-20th century theory. and my guy the english werent ruling themselves for most of their history, let alone ruling french, and again france is only western country that is not anglo to have autonomy, not cuz anglos let them have em.

well they were and for longer than french whose ancestors were slaves if we count romans and how long they held france.
when they gained independence they were ruled by germans and then by vikings as normans whom english successfully ousted.

 

[Hide]

Nose width

Also whites dont have good convexity lol

Every ethnicity is shit in terms of convexity, just blacks are shittier

Rest are valid tho

 

[Hide]

Nose width

Also whites dont have good convexity lol

Every ethnicity is shit in terms of convexity, just blacks are shittier

Rest are valid tho

 

[unstable]

Nose width

Also whites dont have good convexity lol

Every ethnicity is shit in terms of convexity, just blacks are shittier

Rest are valid tho

no whites and west eurasians in general have almost perfect facial convexity angles.

 

[Hide]

no whites and west eurasians in general have almost perfect facial convexity angles.

You'll see 90% with unideal convexity due to chin

 

[unstable]

You'll see 90% with unideal convexity due to chin

still on average you'll find a white having better convexity than indian asian or black person.
although as many or most indians who fall in west eurasian have good convexity.