50 reps for the person who solves this with an explanation

[alpha_provider]

 

[alpha_provider]

150 iq forum

 

[Gengar]

That’s a question mark.

 

[alpha_provider]

That’s a question mark.

Do it

Took @mogger123 5 minutes to get it right

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

Cant figure it out

Over for my retard genes

 

[badluck]

whats the options

 

[Deleted member 46979]

quite simple you are rearranging the lines for each column. solved in 20 seconds

 

[alpha_provider]

whats the options

No options because retards would just randomly guess the answer then.

Explain the pattern and you dont even need to draw the solution

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

Is the pattern that every horizontal row has 8 triangles and every vertical row has 2 squares?

 

[alpha_provider]

View attachment 2534884
Is the pattern that every horizontal row has 8 triangles and every vertical row has 2 squares?

Bro

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

Bro

Answer nigguh

 

[FunkyFlamingo]

niggerballs

 

[_MVP_]

Impossible to solve

 

[alpha_provider]

Answer nigguh

I did. Embarrassing.

 

[Bitchwhipper2]

I did. Embarrassing.

Welp i tried

 

[Meteor21]

Jew wizardry, nothing more

 

[FunkyFlamingo]

what are we even looking for

 

[_MVP_]

I will give U 20k Reps If this Thing actually has a solution

@alpha_provider

 

[MoggerGaston]

Looked for a pattern for 3minutes, couldnt find anything useful

Over for my

 

[Deleted member 29167]

Impossible to solve

werent you high iq?

 

[alpha_provider]

I will give U 20k Reps If this Thing actually has a solution

@alpha_provider

Number of right angles increasing by 1 from figure 1 to figure 9

 

[Deleted member 30188]

good puzzle, could not get it right.

 

[FunkyFlamingo]

do you have the solution to this?

 

[Deleted member 30188]

do you have the solution to this?

Number of right angles increasing by 1 from figure 1 to figure 9

 

[alpha_provider]

do you have the solution to this?

Anything that contains 9 right angles

Example @mogger123 came up with within 5 minutes:

 

[apocalypse]

Number of right angles increasing by 1 from figure 1 to figure 9

 

[FunkyFlamingo]

iq mogged

 

[Deleted member 30188]

Post another one that was good

 

[alpha_provider]

Post another one that was good

Dont know if it annoys people here since it's off-topic. I could spam these constantly, takes me 3 min to create one if i m sober

 

[Deleted member 30188]

Dont know if it annoys people here since it's off-topic. I could spam these constantly, takes me 3 min to create one if i m sober

Keep it in the thread then

 

[FunkyFlamingo]

Dont know if it annoys people here since it's off-topic. I could spam these constantly, takes me 3 min to create one if i m sober

it was kinda interesting

 

[FunkyFlamingo]

ive read somewhere that lower iq people have more sex then higher iq people does looks and iq corollate?

 

[alpha_provider]

ive read somewhere that lower iq people have more sex then higher iq people does looks and iq corollate?

That's true. Dumber people are slaves to basic human instincts (sex drive, aggression).

 

[FunkyFlamingo]

Incel wiki:

Low IQ is actually attractive to women: Low IQ men have more sex. A study conducted by Halpern et. al (2000) found the most sexually active individuals were in the 75-90 IQ range for males, with these males being found to be the least likely to be virgins as adolescents. An IQ below 70 is generally considered to constitute an intellectual disability. 46.7% of low IQ men were sexually active, while only 18.4% of low IQ women were. Thus, low IQ men were 2.5x as likely as low IQ women to be sexually successful.[63]

Evolutionary psychologists such as Geoffrey Miller, with his 'mating mind theory,' have argued that high IQ in males is strongly attractive to women. They argue that this trait primarily evolved due to sexual selection pressures, claiming that human intelligence only could have developed to such a high degree because of sexual selection for intelligence. Miller claims this is due to basic survival seemingly only requiring low levels of general intelligence, and thus natural selection wouldn't have been enough for human's unusually high intelligence to evolve.[26]

 

[lonelycurry]

You need to start having sex and stop doing this bullshit

 

[alpha_provider]

You need to start having sex and stop doing this bullshit

Why are you assuming i m not doing both? Bluepilled much?

 

[lonelycurry]

Why are you assuming i m not doing both? Bluepilled much?

I've had more sex in the last 2 months than you will in your lifetime, Incel

 

[FunkyFlamingo]

fucking your bodypillow doesnt count

 

[Deleted member 30188]

Incel wiki:

Low IQ is actually attractive to women: Low IQ men have more sex. A study conducted by Halpern et. al (2000) found the most sexually active individuals were in the 75-90 IQ range for males, with these males being found to be the least likely to be virgins as adolescents. An IQ below 70 is generally considered to constitute an intellectual disability. 46.7% of low IQ men were sexually active, while only 18.4% of low IQ women were. Thus, low IQ men were 2.5x as likely as low IQ women to be sexually successful.[63]

Evolutionary psychologists such as Geoffrey Miller, with his 'mating mind theory,' have argued that high IQ in males is strongly attractive to women. They argue that this trait primarily evolved due to sexual selection pressures, claiming that human intelligence only could have developed to such a high degree because of sexual selection for intelligence. Miller claims this is due to basic survival seemingly only requiring low levels of general intelligence, and thus natural selection wouldn't have been enough for human's unusually high intelligence to evolve.[26]

monkey breed with monkeys because they are not able to appreciate intellectual activity

 

[Deleted member 30188]

I've had more sex in the last 2 months than you will in your lifetime, Incel

lonelycurry​

Kraken​

JoinedMay 17, 2021Posts3,045Reputation3,348

 

[alpha_provider]

fucking your bodypillow doesnt count

do I have the best stats on this forum (except height and weight)?

height: 179 cm current weight: 103 kg PSL (face): 6.5 - 7 slaycount: 41 (a couple of mtbs, every other girl was htb+) cock size: slightly over 8 x 6.2 norwood level: 1 internipple distance: 25 cm nationality/race/ethnicity: native European net worth: like 5-6 million E, not counting real estate...

looksmax.org

 

[FunkyFlamingo]

do I have the best stats on this forum (except height and weight)?

height: 179 cm current weight: 103 kg PSL (face): 6.5 - 7 slaycount: 41 (a couple of mtbs, every other girl was htb+) cock size: slightly over 8 x 6.2 norwood level: 1 internipple distance: 25 cm nationality/race/ethnicity: native European net worth: like 5-6 million E, not counting real estate...

looksmax.org

i was talking to him

 

[alpha_provider]

lonelycurry​

Kraken​

JoinedMay 17, 2021Posts3,045Reputation3,348

Are people here too stupid to even attempt expressing their opinion about my threads or what?

Legit ridiculous And you wonder why you are sexless. Nothing more off-putting for women than guys who get socially, intellectually and verbally dominated in almost every interaction with others. But keep measuring your facial ratios, lmao, that's totally the source of your inceldom.

looksmax.org

 

[badluck]

Number of right angles increasing by 1 from figure 1 to figure 9

fuck it really was that simple i have to physically punish myself now for not solving this instantly

 

[alpha_provider]

Keep it in the thread then

a) -5, -41, -109, -209, ?
b) 6; 7, 22, 69, 284, ?

 

[OldRooster]

Number of right angles increasing by 1 from figure 1 to figure 9

That is an insightful observation, but there is still an infinite number of solutions that solve for #9. The OP question was structured like it was an IQ test question. Although I don't know of any strict rule, it has always been my observation that IQ questions always have strictly only one solution.

 

[alpha_provider]

That is an insightful observation, but there is still an infinite number of solutions that solve for #9. The OP question was structured like it was an IQ test question. Although I don't know of any strict rule, it has always been my observation that IQ questions always have strictly only one solution.

Both types of problems are considered valid

I ll post some with 1 solution later

 

[Deleted member 25710]

Why wahlberg, not damon, stallone or de niro?

 

[alpha_provider]

Why wahlberg, not damon, stallone or de niro?

Never used pastallone, and only rarely de niro

It's damon, wahlberg, cumberbatch, ulliel, nicholson, pharrell and tito

 

[Magnum Opus]

Already solved it months ago on a thread from an alt of yours