50 reps for the person who solves this with an explanation

[the MOUSE]

what's so funny, retard

dont gatekeep, u can give better answer than that. also og question in this thread isnt good for diagnosing iq but rather autism imo, what kind of nigga will come to think that its ascending num of 90 degree. stupid q. ive noticed this in ur other qs too, rat of zagreb. its just obscure solns made by an autist majority will not be able to come to as u gotta think so autisticallly, it has little inductive reasoning, pattern recognition etc. larping lawyer feeding his dunning krueger ego, false sense of superiority. take real test dalit scum.

 

[alpha_provider]

dont gatekeep, u can give better answer than that. also og question in this thread isnt good for diagnosing iq but rather autism imo, what kind of nigga will come to think that its ascending num of 90 degree. stupid q. ive noticed this in ur other qs too, rat of zagreb. its just obscure solns made by an autist majority will not be able to come to as u gotta think so autisticallly, it has little inductive reasoning, pattern recognition etc. larping lawyer feeding his dunning krueger ego, false sense of superiority. take real test dalit scum.

i had the perfect score on this, the best existing iq test alongside SB

regarding your cognitive inferiority-induced mental breakdown, i completely understand you

 

[Part-Time Chad]

Well, what's the official solution? There are probably many ways to interpret this, depending on an individual's psychological makeup.

 

[alpha_provider]

Well, what's the official solution? There are probably many ways to interpret this, depending on an individual's psychological makeup.

if you can detect a pattern simpler than the one i provided (a simple increase in the number of right angles), you won

 

[the MOUSE]

i had the perfect score on this, the best existing iq test alongside SB

regarding your cognitive inferiority-induced mental breakdown, i completely understand you

 

[alpha_provider]

Numbers

don't think anyone will come close to solving this, but:

3, 39, 107, 207, ?

 

[the MOUSE]

don't think anyone will come close to solving this, but:

3, 39, 107, 207, ?

339

 

[alpha_provider]

you should have realized i'd blocked you by now. not even entertaining, just dull and annoying

 

[Deleted member 16275]

don't think anyone will come close to solving this, but:

3, 39, 107, 207, ?

This all I've got, so far

 

[alpha_provider]

View attachment 2537918
This all I've got, so far

you guys don't seem to understand the concept of a pattern. it's not about combining random numbers and operations to get to the next number in the sequence

 

[Deleted member 16275]

don't think anyone will come close to solving this, but:

3, 39, 107, 207, ?

@BrahminBoss try

 

[alpha_provider]

@BrahminBoss try

addition, multiplication and subtraction only, btw

 

[Deleted member 23558]

@BrahminBoss try

just square and add with d as 4 and start from -1. u get 339

 

[Deleted member 16275]

Its pretty easy dude how do u not see it just square and add with d as 4 and start from -1. u get 339

From 39 to 107, 68 is added, which isn't a square. The nearest square is 64 which is 8 squared

 

[Deleted member 23558]

From 39 to 107, 68 is added, which isn't a square. The nearest square is 64 which is 8 squared

2 square plus -1

6 square plus 3

10 square plus 7

do you get it now

 

[alpha_provider]

2 square plus -1

6 square plus 3

10 square plus 7

do you get it now

where did you get 2-6-10 from? by what rule does that progression work? seems completely random/reverse-engineered

 

[Deleted member 23558]

where did you get 2-6-10 from? by what rule does that progression work? seems completely random/reverse-engineered

inital term is 2 ,d is 4 for the squaring terms, inital term is -1 ,d is 4 for the additive terms. its simple AP

 

[alpha_provider]

inital term is 2 ,d is 4 for the squaring terms, inital term is -1 ,d is 4 for the additive terms. its simple AP

jesus. and where's the rule/regularity here? in competition of multiple solution in these problems, the simplest one is considered correct.

in other words ...

1 + 2x3 – 4 = 3
5 + 6x7 – 8 = 39
9 + 10x11 – 12 = 107
13 + 14x15 – 16 = 207
17 + 18x19 – 20 = 339

 

[Deleted member 23558]

jesus. and where's the rule/regularity here? in competition of multiple solution in these problems, the simplest one is considered correct.

in other words ...

1 + 2x3 – 4 = 3
5 + 6x7 – 8 = 39
9 + 10x11 – 12 = 107
13 + 14x15 – 16 = 207
17 + 18x19 – 20 = 339

this is cleaner

2^2 - 1

6^2 +3

10^2 +7

14^2 + 11

 

[alpha_provider]

this is cleaner

2^2 - 1

6^2 +3

10^2 +7

14^2 + 11

why the 2-6-10-14 sequence? why squaring? why add 4 between -1, +3, +7 and + 11?

lol

express this with a formula (it can easily be done with my process)

 

[the MOUSE]

why the 2-6-10-14 sequence? why squaring? why add 4 between -1, +3, +7 and + 11?

lol

express this with a formula (it can easily be done with my process)

fuckin nigger bitch i got it correct first brahminboss jus reverse engineered from mine and still got it wrong. i did it another way, theres a general technique to sequences. unignore me, i apologise for what i did in the past, we shouldnt let it burden us further however. lets join forces, i want to learn more from you, be my mentor, we will take over world with our iq @alpha_provider

 

[longjohnmong]

dude, patterns, lmao

 

[alpha_provider]

dude, patterns, lmao

more butthurt rage

 

[Deleted member 23558]

fuckin nigger bitch i got it correct first brahminboss jus reverse engineered from mine and still got it wrong. i did it another way, theres a general technique to sequences. unignore me, i apologise for what i did in the past, we shouldnt let it burden us further however. lets join forces, i want to learn more from you, be my mentor, we will take over world with our iq @alpha_provider

I don’t even read your comment it took me like 2 minutes to solve in my head while I was eating dinner lol. The only reason I even look in these threads was because @inferiorpispot234 tagged me. If you want to really challenge yourself try solving mate in 30 chess puzzles