5'9 HTN vs 6'0 MTN vs 6'3 LTN (same frame proportions)

[Mezo103]

Rank them

 

[currylightskin]

first to last

 

[chrisN]

Titles ranking is correct

 

[Mezo103]

Titles ranking is correct

So face > height?

 

[chrisN]

So face > height?

No, htn below 5,9 I would have said the mtn tall one

But then again htns can get away with being short like Kaden hammond

 

[Mezo103]

No, htn below 5,9 I would have said the mtn tall one

But then again htns can get away with being short like Kaden hammond

Bro that guy is chadlite

 

[Mezo103]

If he's only HTN then its over for 99% of us

 

[chrisN]

If he's only HTN then its over for 99% of us

He's 5,5 and chadlite not 5,9

 

[5.5psl]

5'9 HTN > 6'3 LTN > 6'0MTN

Coz MTN and ltn both are invisible facially and won't be considered attractive by most women whereas at 6'3 you get a solid height halo and at 6' you are just abv avg or even avg depending on your location.

 

[Deleted member 11126]

Rank them

I don't like these types of questions objectively whenever I do ratings I always ask for height and take frame/muscle into account. These all factor into a general scale. A 5'4 with a chad face cannot be chad he is maybe even lower then a MTN 5'10 guy like me.

I would say 5'10 is neutral height 5'9-5'7 minus 1 point. below that more serious hits at a exponential rate. Its sort of like a bell curve past 6'1 you also get expontially less benefit per inch outside of fetish/niche appeal. If your uglier or shorter then 80% of men its likely over though regardless if your height or face make up for it or whatever attraction is a collection of good averages

 

[oldcell]

I don't like these types of questions objectively whenever I do ratings I always ask for height and take frame/muscle into account. These all factor into a general scale. A 5'4 with a chad face cannot be chad he is maybe even lower then a MTN 5'10 guy like me.

I would say 5'10 is neutral height 5'9-5'7 minus 1 point. below that more serious hits at a exponential rate. Its sort of like a bell curve past 6'1 you also get expontially less benefit per inch outside of fetish/niche appeal. If your uglier or shorter then 80% of men its likely over though regardless if your height or face make up for it or whatever attraction is a collection of good averages

Wrong

U cannot have 5'9 and 5'7 at one category

Those two inches are difference between life and death at dating literally

One has 70 percent dating pool acoording to study and other 25

 

[Deleted member 11126]

Wrong

U cannot have 5'9 and 5'7 at one category

Those two inches are difference between life and death at dating literally

One has 70 percent dating pool acoording to study and other 25

Yeah fair point. Every inch past 5'6-5'11 from a study I read was an extra 8 grand per year in income. Then it was greatly less impactful past this point.

 

[Deleted member 11126]

Wrong

U cannot have 5'9 and 5'7 at one category

Those two inches are difference between life and death at dating literally

One has 70 percent dating pool acoording to study and other 25

Also no way 5'9 has 70% more like 30-40%. I'd say 5'11 is 70% of course there are exceptions girls who say 6'1+ would look the other way for a really good looking 5'10 guy.

 

[Deleted member 4106]

Mtn 6'0 > htn 5'9 > ltn 6'3

 

[Foreverbrad]

HTN > MTN > LTN

Height differences aren’t big enough to compensate.

Make it 6’6 / 6’0 / 5’6 and it might be a different story but I’d still put my money on the HTN.

 

[oldcell]

Also no way 5'9 has 70% more like 30-40%. I'd say 5'11 is 70% of course there are exceptions girls who say 6'1+ would look the other way for a really good looking 5'10 guy.

Nope

According to study 5 8 had exactly 50 percent 5 10 had 75 percent , 5 7 was death on 25 google it is somwhere online

Lol if u think 175 cm guy has 30 percent dating pool, its like average at USA

I am that height and my last 5 slays were all 5 8 to 5 10

 

[Deleted member 11126]

Nope

According to study 5 8 had exactly 50 percent 5 10 had 75 percent , 5 7 was death on 25 google it is somwhere online

Lol if u think 175 cm guy has 30 percent dating pool, its like average at USA

I am that height and my last 5 slays were all 5 8 to 5 10

Depends how good looking like I said there are exceptions. But I would say for the majority of guys without top tier faces this gets rid of 50% of women at least.

 

[oldcell]

Depends how good looking like I said there are exceptions. But I would say for the majority of guys without top tier faces this gets rid of 50% of women at least.

Probably . at that height u need above average face and good body preferably

Reminder guys like Amnesia and FG from this site are that height too, i would not say 175cm is that bad , its slight bad

 

[Deleted member 11126]

Probably . at that height u need above average face and good body preferably

Reminder guys like Amnesia and FG from this site are that height too, i would not say 175cm is that bad , its slight bad

Yeah your right but I would still say its overall bad today. 5'10-11 is where you are basically neutral

 

[IMOGYOU]

face is king