D
Deleted member 20399
Ugliest man alive
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2022
- Posts
- 31,884
- Reputation
- 32,693
She might grow even taller….
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
She’s ugly thoughgod I want to fuck a tallfoid
Im on day 11 of nofap nigga my standards are rock bottomShe’s ugly though
homo spottedgod I want to fuck a tallfoid
5’11and how tall are you?
i dont get it. youre a mongoloid that venerates nordics and yet you unexplainably hate white women. peak hypocrisy and retardationaverage white "woman"
Jesus and you didn't rope yet?5’11
I know, it’s brutalJesus and you didn't rope yet?
A good half of white foids heightmog you
so 180.5 cm, you shouldn't look too short next to her.5’11
No hypocrisy there. Equality is cope boyo - nordic women don't have to be superior just because nordic men are.i dont get it. youre a mongoloid that venerates nordics and yet you unexplainably hate white women. peak hypocrisy and retardation
It a trannyShe has a deep voice though I seriously wonder if it’s a tranny
5’10 next to 6’2so 180.5 cm, you shouldn't look too short next to her.
it's the other way around i'm afraid, light is feminine and dark is masculine. and neither would exist without the other because nerdic genes are recessive and light features always get lost through mixed breeding.No hypocrisy there. Equality is cope boyo - nordic women don't have to be superior just because nordic men are.
Brutal5’10 next to 6’2
Doesn't look that bad. In my opinion a heightmog becomes humiliating only when the tip of your hair is below the eye/eyebrow level of the guy next to you.5’10 next to 6’2
So basically the cut-off is exactly 10 cm, which is the height difference between you and that girl.Doesn't look that bad. In my opinion a heightmog becomes humiliating only when the tip of your hair is below the eye/eyebrow level of the guy next to you.
All incorrect.it's the other way around i'm afraid, light is feminine and dark is masculine. and neither would exist without the other because nerdic genes are recessive and light features always get lost through mixed breeding.
also, tall =/ masculine, taller females are more attractive because they are more developed than boneless womanlets.
Imagine going to work to get height mogged by a foidShe might grow even taller….
All that just for 5’9 med jocks with wide clavicles to mogAll incorrect.
European men are lighter, therefore being light is better for men. Low contrast is also a cue to sexual dimorphism - it makes you look more "male".
Nordic genes are not recessive and they managed to spread by nordic men conquering ethnic women. Clearly they didnt get lost when nordic steppe invaders intermixed with veddoid-looking native european women. Anthropology 101
Tall is indeed masculine, more specifically gerontomorphic. Being "more developed" is a huge failo when youre developed towards being more male-like. In that regard, being underdeveloped is superior for women.
That's like a 2 inch difference beware of frauds5’10 next to 6’2
I wouldn't want manlet sonshomo spotted
very unlikely for a 5'9 med "jock" to have wide claviclesAll that just for 5’9 med jocks with wide clavicles to mog
3 if we start from the tips of their hairThat's like a 2 inch difference beware of frauds
okay, time to become a retarded scholar like you and disprove all your points with muh studies then.All incorrect.
European men are lighter, therefore being light is better for men. Low contrast is also a cue to sexual dimorphism - it makes you look more "male".
Nordic genes are not recessive and they managed to spread by nordic men conquering ethnic women. Clearly they didnt get lost when nordic steppe invaders intermixed with veddoid-looking native european women. Anthropology 101
Tall is indeed masculine, more specifically gerontomorphic. Being "more developed" is a huge failo when youre developed towards being more male-like. In that regard, being underdeveloped is superior for women.
What’s ur height buddy BoyoJesus and you didn't rope yet?
A good half of white foids heightmog you
Bluepilled cuckwomen don't grow past 17
I am spark, nice to meet you!Bluepilled cuck
Youre retarded. Eye and hair color are polygenic.okay, time to become a retarded scholar like you and disprove all your points with muh studies then.
Light genes are indeed recessive:
The allele for brown eyes is the most dominant allele and is always dominant over the other two alleles and the allele for green eyes is always dominant over the allele for blue eyes, which is always recessive.
sauce: https://www.news-medical.net/health/Genetics-of-Eye-Color.aspx#:~:text=The allele for brown eyes,eyes, which is always recessive.
For hair color, the theory goes:
sauce:https://sneakpeektest.com/blog/what-color-hair-will-my-baby-have/#:~:text=The Truth About Dominant and Recessive Genes,-You may have&text=For hair color, the theory,hair is a dominant gene.
- Each parent carries two alleles (gene variants) for hair color. Blonde hair is a recessive gene and brown hair is a dominant gene.
muh nerdics. recessive subhumans in every possible way. and for females I don't have to search up any studies, less height = more chances of offspring becoming short subhumans, it is a fact.
Even actors are sub 5 when they age5’10 next to 6’2
Youre retarded. Eye and hair color are polygenic.
These are not sources, but blogposts written by non-geneticists
I never tried to do disprove genetics. Blue eyes being recessive is just a common misconception.View attachment 2117938
Subhuman mongol literally trying to disprove genetics now lol. just accept that nerd genetics are submissive and recessive. Nord men look like women in 2023.
It's a genetic fact, dark features are dominantI never tried to do disprove genetics. Blue eyes being recessive is just a common misconception.
No point arguing with him. Dude thinks flat Asian women are hotter than white girlsView attachment 2117938
Subhuman mongol literally trying to disprove genetics now lol. just accept that nerd genetics are submissive and recessive. Nord men look like women in 2023.
It's a myth started by the Nazis and white supremacists in America. Something akin to one drop rule. Almost all people I know who have had a dark eyed and a light eyed parent, ended up having light eyes. Take your 1940s knowledge of genetics elsewhere.It's a genetic fact, dark features are dominant
Then supply some more of your studies to back up the claim, retard, not anecdotal evidence. Oh wait, you can't, because when someone catches up to your bullshit you're just a useless retarded sfcel with 0 proof, and a mongol at that to make it even patheticIt's a myth started by the Nazis and white supremacists in America. Something akin to one drop rule. Almost all people I know who have had a dark eyed and a light eyed parent, ended up having light eyes. Take your 1940s knowledge of genetics elsewhere.
Also it's kinda common sense that blue eyes and blonde hair are not only not recessive, but probably dominant traits. Because the trait needs to be "dominant" for it to go from non-existent to dominating the phenotype of an entire race within only 5 thousand years.
My usual day tbh...Imagine going to work to get height mogged by a foid
Blackpill brvtality…My usual day tbh...
I do not care anymore...
I am 5'10 by the way
Lol at this pathetic jubilation.Then supply some more of your studies to back up the claim, retard, not anecdotal evidence. Oh wait, you can't, because when someone catches up to your bullshit you're just a useless retarded sfcel with 0 proof, and a mongol at that to make it even pathetic
Dark features have been proven to be dominant over light recessive ones, hence why the majority of people in the world have brown eyes/black hair. Same thing with skintone as well, most mulattos are brown skinned and rarely come out with lighter tones