6'4 roided to suicide or 6'8 normal good frame

[Deleted member 16220]

title + reasons

 

[Deleted member 14693]

Depends on the face tbh

 

[Interested]

6'4 roided, but not juiced to the core.

6'8 looks abnormal in most cases.

 

[Orc]

6'2 vs 6'10

6'2 vs 5'9


frame is as important as height.

 

[AscensionMan98]

Depends on the face tbh

Roided to suicide sounds bad. Last thing you want to do is look like some clown freak roid head. 6ft 8 with a good frame is unheard of as beyond heights of 6ft 4 unless very genetically gifted its difficult to put on mass. Even an average good natty gym cel body at that height would be a giga halo

That being said if the roid head looks has Jon Skywalker proportions whose also 6ft 4 and on roids, then obviously take the 6ft 4 juice head.

Beyond 6ft 2 to 6ft 3 barefoot the height advantage isn't that substantial to its benefits ( meaning things like building mass get a lot harder unless genetically gifted ).

 

[Deleted member 16220]

View attachment 22456476'2 vs 6'10

View attachment 2245648 6'2 vs 5'9


frame is as important as height.

Yes.

Clearly being DYEL is a joke.

 

[Deleted member 28904]

View attachment 22456476'2 vs 6'10

View attachment 2245648 6'2 vs 5'9


frame is as important as height.

Wow you just framepilled me, what site do you use for these?

 

[AscensionMan98]

View attachment 22456476'2 vs 6'10

View attachment 2245648 6'2 vs 5'9


frame is as important as height.

Women dont see it like that for the 6ft. 2 vs 5ft 9

 

[Deleted member 23219]

Is there a point of diminishing returns for male height assuming the males we´re talking about have the frame and muscles to back it up?
The answer for your question depends mostly on that, because we definetly know there´s a point of diminishing returns around 25FFMI (and that´s really pushing it) when it comes to building muscle as far as female attraction goes.
We produce myostatin, cortisol and other catabolic hormones for a reason, there is an evolutionary advantage behind producing them in healthy amounts. So it only makes sense for toilets to select for that advantage (ovER for hardcore gymcels)

We also produce growth stunting hormones, so there is also an advantage in not being a lanklet.
But subjectively speaking (remember that this comes from an autistic .orgcel with diagnosed aspergers) toilets don´t seem to select against it. I literally see 8/10 gigastacys cuck 6´0´´ chads with 6´5´´ 4PSL anorexic looking mfs on a regular basis.

 

[cytoplasm]

id rather be 6'4 but 6'8 mogs. you can always roid if you wish

 

[Deleted member 25198]

obviously the taller one

 

[forevermirin]

6'8 normal good frame, because it mogs objectively.​

 

[Deleted member 27472]

View attachment 22456476'2 vs 6'10

View attachment 2245648 6'2 vs 5'9


frame is as important as height.

@5.5psl @EasyMan875 @Skywalker

frame is life

 

[Interested]

View attachment 22456476'2 vs 6'10

View attachment 2245648 6'2 vs 5'9


frame is as important as height.

incel tallfag vs chad dwarf

 

[Skywalker]

View attachment 22456476'2 vs 6'10

View attachment 2245648 6'2 vs 5'9


frame is as important as height.

you could have put these 3 in the same picture to illustrate your example in a clear way