7, 343, 1728, 373248, ?

[AbandonShip]

a) I don't believe you, you were writing retarded shit

b) if you don't explain your method you don't get credit

look at my first reply itt. I had already figured this out

 

[Deleted member 13787]

@youngmax

 

[AbandonShip]

ok

is your solution as "unaesthetic"?

 

[Deleted member 12217]

yeah

So 496793088

Is the right answer ?

 

[Deleted member 18258]

So 496793088

Is the right answer ?

na he said it aint what he had in mind

 

[Harold O'brien]

So 496793088

Is the right answer ?

wasn't the solution I had but it fits so who is to say what is and isn't a right answer

 

[AbandonShip]

wasn't the solution I had but it fits so who is to say what is and isn't a right answer

It doesnt fit. Theres no role of 7 in the series. If you think that it fits then i dont need to know your solution cause its probably equally shit

 

[Deleted member 12217]

wasn't the solution I had but it fits so who is to say what is and isn't a right answer

it doesn’t fit. The first 7 doesn’t fit in that solution.

 

[AbandonShip]

it doesn’t fit. The first 7 doesn’t fit in that solution.

OP is wasting our time

 

[AbandonShip]

I am going to fail my test tomorrow because of his series

 

[Deleted member 12217]

OP is wasting our time

I thought it was a series out of those IQ Tests. But since he made it im doubting it as well ngl. Op has a history of trying to come across as super smart

 

[Hades]

Suck my ____

mog

 

[Harold O'brien]

it doesn’t fit. The first 7 doesn’t fit in that solution.

first number can be a base

 

[AbandonShip]

mog

hi

 

[AbandonShip]

first number can be a base

suck a dik tbh

 

[Harold O'brien]

I thought it was a series out of those IQ Tests. But since he made it in doubting it as well ngl

the sequences in those iq tests were also made by some guy btw

 

[Deleted member 12217]

first number can be a base

Yeah but then the base would have to be essential. Like the Fibonacci series. But in his solution the 7 is absolutly pointless

Without the 7 the series would be the same. Making the 7 useless

 

[Harold O'brien]

Yeah but then the base would have to be essential. Like the Fibonacci series. But in his solution the 7 is absolutly pointless

Without the 7 the series would be the same. Making the 7 useless

wtf are you even saying you just have a_0=x and then define it recursively

 

[Deleted member 12217]

the sequences in those iq tests were also made by some guy btw

Not just one. There are plenty of ppl looking over them. You as a single person can make mistakes and be oblivious to them

 

[Deleted member 12217]

wtf are you even saying you just have a_0=x and then define it recursively

Look

In this Solution here

7^3 = 343
12^3 = 1728
72^3 = 373248
and 7 x 12 -72 = 12
12 x 12 - 72 = 72
so 72 x 12 - 72 = 792
and 792^3 = 496793088

There is no explanation for the first 7 and neither is it a base to compute the 343

You might argue the 7 is the base in the 7^3 but then the next step would be 343^3 following that logic. Which isn’t the case

 

[Deleted member 12217]

@Harold O'brien dm me the solution and I see if it makes sense or not. So others can either stop or keep trying

 

[Harold O'brien]

Look

In this Solution here


There is no explanation for the first 7 and neither is it a base to compute the 343

You might argue the 7 is the base in the 7^3 but then the next step would be 343^3 following that logic. Which isn’t the case

a_0=7

a_n= [12(a_{n-1})-72]^3

 

[Harold O'brien]

@Harold O'brien dm me the solution and I see if it makes sense or not. So others can either stop or keep trying

but that skips 7^3

 

[Deleted member 12217]

a_0=7

a_n= [12(a_{n-1})-72]^3

is that the solution you have?

 

[Deleted member 13787]

i see absolutely zero relation between the first and last 2 numbers tbh
except the power of 3, the relation must be something very vague
i can write random numbers which would in theory be a vague solution but i dont think its worth it
i give up

 

[Harold O'brien]

you could have

b_0=7

b_n= 12(a_{n-1})-72

a_n=(b_n)^3

 

[Deleted member 12217]

i see absolutely zero relation between the first and last 2 numbers tbh
except the power of 3, the relation must be something very vague
i can write random numbers which would in theory be a vague solution but i dont think its worth it
i give up

Starting to think his series isn’t really a series ngl

 

[Deleted member 13787]

what also bugs me is how 343 is related to 1728, because 1728 is (3*4)^3
but i dont think this is the right path

 

[Harold O'brien]

i see absolutely zero relation between the first and last 2 numbers tbh
except the power of 3, the relation must be something very vague
i can write random numbers which would in theory be a vague solution but i dont think its worth it
i give up

formal:

represent numbers as cxd where c is the first digit, d is the last digit and x is all digits inbetween

let f,g and h be functions such that f(cxd) =c, g(cxd)=x, h(cxd)=d

then intended solution was a_0=7, a_{n+1}= g(a_n)^3 * f(a_n)^g(a_n)

that was probably way too formal


informal:

first digit of last term to the power of last digit of last term multiplied by middle of last term cubed

ie (3^3)*(4^3)=1728 or (72^3)*(1^8)=373248

so ? would be (7324^3)*(3^8)

 

[Deleted member 12217]

formal:

represent numbers as cxd where c is the first digit, d is the last digit and x is all digits inbetween

let f,g and h be functions such that f(cxd) =c, g(cxd)=x, h(cxd)=d

then intended solution was a_0=7, a_{n+1}= g(a_n)^3 * f(a_n)^g(a_n)

that was probably way too formal


informal:

first digit of last term to the power of last digit of last term multiplied by middle of last term cubed

ie (3^3)*(4^3)=1728 or (72^3)*(1^8)=373248

so ? would be (7324^3)*(3^8)

That doesn’t work.



You can’t compute

a_1 out of a_0

 

[Harold O'brien]

That doesn’t work.



You can’t compute

a_1 out of a_0

if c=x=d then f(.)=h(.)=1

 

[Deleted member 12217]

if c=x=d then f(.)=h(.)=1

Lol

What’s next. A series where ever number has its own exception? You can’t fck up a series like that and then pretend it was all calculated. Besides that this series is dumb af


The 5th number is to the power of 15 lol you don’t even know the real 5th number yourself.

 

[Harold O'brien]

Lol

What’s next. A series where ever number has its own exception? You can’t fck up a series like that and then pretend it was all calculated. Besides that this series is dumb af


The 5th number is to the power of 15 lol you don’t even know the real 5th number yourself.

the rule is very intuitive, just difficult to formalize

people who couldn't solve getting mad, nothing new

 

[Deleted member 12217]

the rule is very intuitive, just difficult to formalize

people who couldn't solve getting mad, nothing new

Man you made a mistake and are too narci to realize or accept it.

This series is 1) not solveable with logic as you needed to introduce an exception.


2) you don’t even know the exact 5th number cuz your calculator doesn’t give you exact numbers to the power of 15

3) even if you started with 343 and didn’t have that 7 in it that rule is the most random rule I’ve ever seen, which also would make the 5th number do outrageously large


But yeah as it stands that series is false due to the 7

 

[Harold O'brien]

Man you made a mistake and are too narci to realize or accept it.

This series is 1) not solveable with logic as you needed to introduce an exception.


2) you don’t even know the exact 5th number cuz your calculator doesn’t give you exact numbers to the power of 15

3) even if you started with 343 and didn’t have that 7 in it that rule is the most random rule I’ve ever seen


But yeah as it stands that series is false due to the 7

stfu midwit

 

[Deleted member 12217]

stfu midwit

You better learn that we all make mistakes and you aren’t as smart as you think. I had to learn it the hard way by having a doctor In IT basically tell me I did some retarded shit.

 

[Harold O'brien]

You better learn that we all make mistakes and you aren’t as smart as you think. I had to learn it the hard way by having a doctor In IT basically tell me I did some retarded shit.

one of your "criticisms" is literally number too big I don't like it lmfao

 

[Deleted member 12217]

one of your "criticisms" is literally number too big I don't like it lmfao

One of the criticism. Exactly. The most important one was that your series as you wrote it down doesn’t work (without exceptions).


What you did is the equivalent of focusing on a typo…


Your series doesn’t work and you didn’t think That one through

 

[Harold O'brien]

One of the criticism. Exactly. The most important one was that your series as you wrote it down doesn’t work without exceptions.


That’s the equivalent of focusing on a typo…


Your series doesn’t work and you didn’t think That one through

it's intuitively very clear that if you have only one digit you treat it as the middle one

you are just mad because you didn't get it, and that's ok

 

[Deleted member 12217]

it's intuitively very clear that if you have only one digit you treat it as the middle one

you are just mad because you didn't get it, and that's ok

I don’t judge people for Doing a mistake. Everyone does that. But people who do them and have an attitude like you, can’t accept their mistakes.

It’s not even anything at stake here. Relax

 

[Harold O'brien]

I don’t judge people for Doing a mistake. Everyone does that. But people who do them and have an attitude like you, can’t accept their mistakes and thus also can’t learn. Those people are an issue.


It’s not even anything at stake here. Relax

it's not a mistake, retard

caging at the condescending attitude to project your own frustrations though. this is where I am in my element

 

[Deleted member 12217]

it's not a mistake, retard

caging at the condescending attitude to project your own frustrations though. this is where I am in my element

Gladly I’m not like you anymore. Thinking I’m super smart n always right.

 

[Harold O'brien]

Gladly I’m not like you anymore. Thinking I’m super smart n always right.

yeah, that's what happens to people who tend to be wrong

 

[Deleted member 13787]

the 72 in 1728 is a dead giveaway
cant believe i didnt notice it, after that the problem is a piece of cake

 

[Deleted member 12217]

the 72 in 1728 is a dead giveaway
cant believe i didnt notice it, after that the problem is a piece of cake

You think it makes sense?

 

[Deleted member 13787]

You think it makes sense?

it does
why wouldnt it
turns out its not as vague as i thought, and like i said, the 72 makes it obvious, yet i somehow didnt notice it

 

[Deleted member 12217]

it does
why wouldnt it
turns out its not as vague as i thought, and like i said, the 72 makes it obvious, yet i somehow didnt notice it

i don’t see how the 72 makes it obvious at all


Also still the issue with the 7 that doesn’t fit the series as you can’t Compute a1 out of a0

 

[Deleted member 12217]

it does
why wouldnt it
turns out its not as vague as i thought, and like i said, the 72 makes it obvious, yet i somehow didnt notice it

i don’t see how the 72 makes it obvious at all


Also still the issue with the 7 that doesn’t fit the series as you can’t Compute a1 out of a0

Even if we took out the 7 and only had the 343 1728 and last number, so it would be a valid series, i still don’t see how the 72 makes anything obvious here as you still would have to 72^3*8

 

[Deleted member 18258]

Even if we took out the 7 and had the 343 1728 and last number, so it would be a valid series, i still don’t see how the 72 makes anything obvious here as you still would have to 72^3*8

its 72^3 x 1^8 in other words 72^3 x 1

 

[Deleted member 12217]

its 72^3 x 1^8 in other words 72^3 x 1

Ah yeah you are right. Wouldn’t have seen it either way tho