
alpha_provider
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2023
- Posts
- 2,734
- Reputation
- 3,113
eternal respect for everyone who solves this
@mogger123
@mogger123
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
1897?
It’s a sequence which are the products of a prime number times seven, times a growing distance of 6 from its multiples.
Eg:
1*7=7
3*(7+6)=39
5*(7+6+12)=151
7*(7+6+12+24)=477
And so on
pretty good, unsure whether i wouldve been able to get it or not@mogger123, thoughts on this one?
also you fucked up ebcause 13 is included in terms 3 and 4
it should be 11x13 and then 17x19so what
it should be 11x13 and then 17x19
ok budyou are just jealous
Is it expected you do this in your fuckin head? Or is calculator a given?
Well anyone could make a fuckin pattern and call it high IQ.no calculator can help you with these. i usually make some mistakes in the process because i make these drunk, but the patterns are valid and out of reach for any machine
This nigger came with a logical answa but you denied it. Why are multiple answers not possible?It’s a sequence which are the products of a prime number times seven, times a growing sum of 6 and its doubles.
Eg:
1*7=7
3*(7+6)=39
5*(7+6+12)=151
7*(7+6+12+24)=477
…7*(7+6+12+24+48)=1143
And so on
Well anyone could make a fuckin pattern and call it high IQ.
This nigger came with a logical answa but you denied it. Why are multiple answers not possible?
Fine even if it’s not primes I could just say it’s start at 1 then add 2 (only set of natural numbers)from what i'm seeing here, 99% of you dont even understand the term pattern
there is nothing logical about his answer. he just randomly reverse engineered the sequence by using available numbers
he already failed in his first digit, using 1 as a prime number, lmao. and then conveniently skipping 2 so that his "pattern" could work
Fine even if it’s not primes I could just say it’s start at 1 then add 2 only natural numbers.
I don’t like@mogger123, thoughts on this one?