$80 down the drain for a consult with a surgeon who said having recessed infras is ideal

O

Oesteogenesis

Diamond
Joined
Jul 9, 2025
Posts
1,379
Reputation
1,163
Paid $80 and gave DR Fahd my reasonings why and he literally told me that fixing my tear troughs is not ideal for a “masculine” look and instead having these recessed fucked infras and dark under eyes is better esp with my slightly negative-neutral vector. (Whenever I squint you can see the muscle btw)

This was for fat grafting btw, this dude said that these types of under eyes look horrible and it looks weird. Was he right and am I wrong or was I right to reject his idea of aesthetics? He has had 30 years of experience btw and has done over 1027 cases of micro grafting over 15 years.

Reference images I shown since he didn’t understand what I meant, instantly said it looks bad and unnatural. Like fuck bro if that’s unnatural and weird go ahead make me unnatural looking. But see, amazing under eyes with 0 tear troughs and it’s completely smooth.
IMG 1873


IMG 1874
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: Autistical and Y̷a̶g̶a̷m̴i̸
just fucking annihilate him brah
 
  • +1
Reactions: Autistical and Y̷a̶g̶a̷m̴i̸
Paid $80 and gave DR Fahd my reasonings why and he literally told me that fixing my tear troughs is not ideal for a “masculine” look and instead having these recessed fucked infras and dark under eyes is better esp with my slightly negative-neutral vector. (Whenever I squint you can see the muscle btw)

This was for fat grafting btw, this dude said that these types of under eyes look horrible and it looks weird. Was he right and am I wrong or was I right to reject his idea of aesthetics? He has had 30 years of experience btw and has done over 1027 cases of micro grafting over 15 years.

Reference images I shown since he didn’t understand what I meant, instantly said it looks bad and unnatural. Like fuck bro if that’s unnatural and weird go ahead make me unnatural looking.
View attachment 5406142

View attachment 5406143
It could be worse, people order fake test for a few hundred dollars if it's a large supply. Now that's a waste.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Oesteogenesis
It could be worse, people order fake test for a few hundred dollars if it's a large supply. Now that's a waste.
That’s just their own stupidity, this surgeon had a research paper just on fat grafting for over 1000 cases and didn’t have an eye for aesthetics even though his results clearly were amazing.


Good ethics though for actually countering my view, which I respect but it gets to a point where I need to have a say instead of him spamming its unnatural
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Y̷a̶g̶a̷m̴i̸
That’s just their own stupidity, this surgeon had a research paper just on fat grafting for over 1000 cases and didn’t have an eye for aesthetics even though his results clearly were amazing
Weird
 
Paid $80 and gave DR Fahd my reasonings why and he literally told me that fixing my tear troughs is not ideal for a “masculine” look and instead having these recessed fucked infras and dark under eyes is better esp with my slightly negative-neutral vector. (Whenever I squint you can see the muscle btw)

This was for fat grafting btw, this dude said that these types of under eyes look horrible and it looks weird. Was he right and am I wrong or was I right to reject his idea of aesthetics? He has had 30 years of experience btw and has done over 1027 cases of micro grafting over 15 years.

Reference images I shown since he didn’t understand what I meant, instantly said it looks bad and unnatural. Like fuck bro if that’s unnatural and weird go ahead make me unnatural looking. But see, amazing under eyes with 0 tear troughs and it’s completely smooth.
View attachment 5406142

View attachment 5406143
hold him at gunpoint with mike mehlman and force him to give the implants tomorrow and get it done
 
Paid $80 and gave DR Fahd my reasonings why and he literally told me that fixing my tear troughs is not ideal for a “masculine” look and instead having these recessed fucked infras and dark under eyes is better esp with my slightly negative-neutral vector. (Whenever I squint you can see the muscle btw)

This was for fat grafting btw, this dude said that these types of under eyes look horrible and it looks weird. Was he right and am I wrong or was I right to reject his idea of aesthetics? He has had 30 years of experience btw and has done over 1027 cases of micro grafting over 15 years.

Reference images I shown since he didn’t understand what I meant, instantly said it looks bad and unnatural. Like fuck bro if that’s unnatural and weird go ahead make me unnatural looking. But see, amazing under eyes with 0 tear troughs and it’s completely smooth.
View attachment 5406142

View attachment 5406143

I don’t see any tear troughs
 
It looks like you have thin undereye skin (making blood vessels visible). It doesn’t look like you lack structural support in the undereyes. I don’t see any hollowing or shadowing along the tear trough.
 
It looks like you have thin undereye skin (making blood vessels visible). It doesn’t look like you lack structural support in the undereyes. I don’t see any hollowing or shadowing along the tear trough.
thats not me its the reference pictures
 

Similar threads

artisticmnyc
Replies
4
Views
82
i cant rate
i cant rate
D
Replies
31
Views
171
GoldenSeahorse
GoldenSeahorse
artisticmnyc
Replies
2
Views
58
artisticmnyc
artisticmnyc
T
Replies
10
Views
161
hornygoatweed
H
ScientiaAeterna
Replies
1
Views
18
ScientiaAeterna
ScientiaAeterna

Users who are viewing this thread

  • rsj
Back
Top
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →