V
valentine
-
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2024
- Posts
- 40,624
- Reputation
- 76,270
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
isnt, 1:1 being ideal is sfs indian copeis this cope![]()
kind of an irrelevant ratio because of eye spacing tbh but 95 looks better than 1:1 its more high class and high iq lookingSlightly compact is more ideal
Tbh Idk if I should cope with you cause my midface is horse tier, but my ipd is dolphin tier so I end up with a technically compact midface
Short looks childish, long looks too primalkind of an irrelevant ratio because of eye spacing tbh but 95 looks better than 1:1 its more high class and high iq looking
short looks stupid
i honestly associate shorte with being more primal and low iq looking but okShort looks childish, long looks too primal
Idk if mine is 95 or 105 I feel like it’s long but the calculator said otherwise
Leonardo dicaprio is a good examplei honestly associate shorte with being more primal and low iq looking but ok
BrutalLeonardo dicaprio is a good example
He looks too childish because of his compact midface but not really retarded View attachment 4254988
Long midface Leo looks like he would bully normal leo
in kindergarten maybe1.03 is ideal
its not always a reliable ratio like eye spacing can make it less accurate but still i would say around 95 is ideal its more masc and looks higher iqIdk if mine is 95 or 105 I feel like it’s long but the calculator said otherwise

But what about JORDAN BARET![]()