A 1-10 looks scale based on primarily objective metrics

[Deleted member 30887]

If you disagree with my selections, let me know. I based each rate on objective metrics such as facial harmony, angularity, sexual dimorphism, and health indicators to ensure that the choices were as objective as possible. However, men and women alike are sure to have preferences among the higher tiers.

 

[Deleted member 66828]

solid 6/10

 

[Deleted member 30887]

solid 6/10

thats good, the jump from 6-7 is probably one of the largest, not many on the fourm would be a 7

 

[FaceIsLaw]

Finally an accurate scale for once

 

[Deleted member 30887]

Finally an accurate scale for once

Yeah, some of the ones on YouTube are insanely poor with like Ryan Gosling and cavil near the same tier

 

[Deleted member 66828]

Yeah, some of the ones on YouTube are insanely poor with like Ryan Gosling and cavil near the same tier

true, ryan gosling actually very mid imo, like mtn

 

[Deleted member 30887]

true, ryan gosling actually very mid imo, like mtn

He is an anomaly; though his harmony is so poor, his phenotype and coloring somehow make him slightly a

bove average imo