- Credits for the idea of this thread goes entirely to imsubhumanlmfao on discord
- Credits for information and analytics inside of the thread goes to BigBallsLarry, imsubhumanlmfao on discord, the rater “lexi”, the rater “FaceIQ”, aswell as the currently pinned threads and BOTB posts in this forum
- credits for the ANGU and DIMO formulas go to max
- Credits for the looks scale go ENTIRELY to this highly detailed doc, the user that made this has spent hours on it and i completely respect it, however i couldn’t find WHO actually wrote it, so if you see this and wish it to be taken down then i am free to do so.
i have not come up with the examples myself, i simply wrote them down.
Disclaimer: The formulas and facial ratings in this thread might not be seen as the complete truth for everyone, and many people could disagree with placements and scores. This is completely fine, however it’s still a very good place to start, and shouldn’t be immediately dismissed.
- Credits for information and analytics inside of the thread goes to BigBallsLarry, imsubhumanlmfao on discord, the rater “lexi”, the rater “FaceIQ”, aswell as the currently pinned threads and BOTB posts in this forum
- credits for the ANGU and DIMO formulas go to max
- Credits for the looks scale go ENTIRELY to this highly detailed doc, the user that made this has spent hours on it and i completely respect it, however i couldn’t find WHO actually wrote it, so if you see this and wish it to be taken down then i am free to do so.
Code:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1hsV7keyO3pxRtET12Nnbq4E09cGwvVJF1yjC5sBoOdg/edit?gid=1682270163#gid=1682270163i have not come up with the examples myself, i simply wrote them down.
Disclaimer: The formulas and facial ratings in this thread might not be seen as the complete truth for everyone, and many people could disagree with placements and scores. This is completely fine, however it’s still a very good place to start, and shouldn’t be immediately dismissed.
This thread is meant to serve as a guideline on facial analytics, that is both accurate and objective.
In it, we will cover:
- an example of a looks scale - with real life examples and ratings
- A formula on calculating one’s harmony score. (HARM)
- A formula on calculating one’s dismorphism score. (DIMO)
- A formula on calculating one’s angularity score. (ANGU)
- A formula on calculating one’s miscellaneous score. (MISC)
- And how to put these scores into an objective looks rating
Why? - The ratings on this forum are usually done on a whim, and extremely rarely performed with a consistent structure. This leads to inflated variance, personal or subjective bias, unreliable comparisons or just overall bad ratings.
For the people who actually care about precision, that is unacceptable. Therefore, this thread is meant as a staple, repeatable and benchmarked solution to provide yourself or others with accurate, non-biased ratings that also point out flaws and strong points so the users know what to work on.
1. Looks scale
Factored on HARM, DIMO, ANGU and MISC
9.1-10 RANGE (~1 in 1.2million - 1 in billions)
These men are near perfect levels of facial looks, and individuals in this level place among the best (known) looking faces of all time.
Features:
- Only a handful in the world
- Only a few minor imperfections
- Very high facial harmony
- High dismorphism
- High health indicators
- Low BF% (near 8-12%)
- High set cheekbones
Examples:
- Matt Bomer
- Vasily Stepanov
- Rodrigo Guirao Diaz
- Vito Basso
- Henry Cavill
- Mikel Pishek
- Hernan Drago
- Atesh Salih
- Andreo Erikesen
- Miroslav Cech
9 (1 in 1.2million)
strikingly attractive, subjectively can be placed into the 9.1-10 range.
Features:
- Very small group of people (models, actors, etc.)
- Few flaws, perhaps unideal eye spacing, nose shape, etc.
- High facial harmony and dimorphism
- low BF% (near 8-13%)
- High set cheekbones
- High health indicators
Examples:
- Thom Strijd
- David Gandy
- Sebastian Rulli
- Alfredo Hernandez De La Cruz
- Brad Pitt
- Alain Delon
- Jeremy Meeks
- Brian Whittaker
- Simonas Pham
- Tom Cruise
- Tyler Maher
8.5 (1 in 58000)
Exceptionally attractive
Features:
- Few in the world (Mostly models & actors)
- Minimal flaws
- High facial harmony common, but not always present
- Low bodyfat
- Less angularity, but still lean features
- High health indicators
- High facial dimorphism
Examples:
- Tom Welling
- Haruma miuara
- Sahib Faber
- Oscar Spendrup
- Alessandro Dellisola
- Matthew Noszka
- Micheal Yeargar
- Elias de Poot
- Ian Sommerhalder
- Sean Opry
- Alexander Zanoza
8 (1 in 4100)
Surpassingly attractive
Features:
- Easier to find, but can model or act at a high level
- Can have a handful of flaws, and larger ones
- Low gonial angle
- High Fwhr usually necessary
- Low bodyfat
- High health indicators & harmony
- Usually, but not always possess high cheekbones
- High facial dimorphism
Examples:
- Harri Musumeci
- Arvid Gustavasson
- Alex Schlab
- Jensen Ackles
- Laurence Coke
- Chace Crawford
- Michael Ward
- TherealSofian
- Arvid heistner
- Paul Walker
7-7.5 (1 in 68 - 1 in 440)
Considerably or highly attractive
Features:
- Atleast one striking feature
- Recognized for their looks, or will stand out in a crowd
- Can be succesful models/actors
- Low body fat, but less facial angularity than the ones above.
- High health indicators
- High (7.5) or above average (7) facial harmony, usually flawed by eye spacing, face shapes, FWHR, etc.
- High dimorphism, but less than above
Examples:
(7.5)
- Chris Hemsworth
- Harry Styles
- Critsiano Ronaldo
- Cillian Murphy
- Rome Flynn
- Daivid becham
(7)
- Justin Bieber
- Penn Badgley
- Neymar.JR
- Archie Gray
6.5 (1 in 16)
Noticably attractive
Features:
- Can spark a modeling c areer or social media following
- Looks are not a life barier & usually an advantage
- Attractive actors found here
- Facial flaws more obvious
- Hotably higher than average facial dimorphism
- High health indicators
- Bodyfat does not have to be super low, but still in shape
Examples:
- Arthur Kulkov
- Jude Bellingham
- Karl Tune
- Timothee Chalamet
- Noah Beck
- Max motta
- Bradley Cooper
- Jacob Elordi
6 (1 in 5.4)
Decently attractive
Features:
- Generally considered attractive
- Subjectivity comes more into play
- Best looking in a small classroom or workplace
- Facial dimorphism and defenition above average
- Flaws are apparent
- Fit, but not always low bodyfat
Examples:
- Justin Timberlake
- Ben Sherell
- Hector Diaz
- Finley Williams
- James Smith
- Shahid Kapoor
5.5 (1 in 2.7)
Moderately attractive
Features:
- Not seen as unattractive
- Do not stand out in a crowd, but can act or do music
- Face not an advantage or disadvantage in life
- Lacking masculinity
- Facial flaws obvious (bulbous nose, long philtrum, droopy eyes, etc.)
- Facial harmony will typically be average around 55%.
- Health indicators are medium
Examples:
- Charlie Cox
- Kawhi leanord
- Steven Yeun
- Bryce Hall
- Ansel Elgort
- Riz Adhmed
5 (1 in 2)
Decent looking, ordinary
Features:
- Completely ordinary
- Can sometimes be considered below average by some
- Facial dimorphism, strikingness all about average
- Facial harmony almost always below 50%
- Weak chin and jaw are common
- Health indicators can vary
Examples:
- John Mulaney
- Daniel Kaluuya
- Adres Guardado
- Jamie Penedo
- Callum Stodart
- Messi
4.5 (1 in 2.16
Below average looking, can still be considered ordinary
Features:
- Considered ugly by most, but very ordinary in reality
- Bodyfat varies, but can be high around 20%
- Facial harmony lacking
Examples:
- Anoop Desai
- Jonah Hill
- lil Wayne
- Dalvis Paula
- Hirohiko Araki
- Hakan Calhanoglu
4 (1 in 3.69)
Ordinarily ugly
Features:
- Considered ugly by most
- Still very ordinary in public
- Few good features
Examples:
- Ed Sheeran
- Psy
- Jay Z
- DJ Khaled
3.5 (1 in 9.7)
Unordinarily ugly
Features:
- There is not much to note past this point. These are the bottom tiers of facial aesthetics.
- Past his point there is little purpose in discerning exactly how unattractive one’s facial features are.
Examples:
- Hong-Man Choi
- Richard Cabral
- Flavor Flav
- Lewis Capaldi
3 (1 in 39.2)
Extremely ugly
2.5 (1 in 243)
Extraordinarily ugly
2 (1 in 2316)
Otherwordly ugliness
2. MISC formula - calculating a miscellaneous score
MISC makes up 26% of a facial score, therefore next to harmony it’s the second most important formula.
Below you’ll see tables with numbers that will later be calculated into a 0=100 score.
| Skin | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7 | Tier 8 | Ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skin clearness (acne + blemishes) | 50 | 25 | 10 | 5 | 0 | -10 | -20 | -30 | No acne or blemishes |
| Hyperpigmentation | 30 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | -5 | -10 | -30 | None |
| Moles | 10 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -5 | -10 | None |
| Skin texture | 15 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -2 | -5 | Smooth |
| Acne scarring | 15 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -2 | -5 | None |
| Facial folds + wrinkles | 40 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | -5 | -15 |
| Eye area | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7 | Tier 8 | Ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper eyelid | 35 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 0 | -5 | -15 | No UEE, straight/curved, no drooping |
| Lower eyelid shape | 20 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -3 | -8 | Straight/slightly curved, no drooping |
| Sclera show | 15 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -5 | -10 | -15 | None |
| Eyelashes | 15 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | -2 | -4 | Thick, dense, dark | |
| Eyebrows | 30 | 18 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 0 | -5 | -15 | Thick, dense, dark |
| Periorbital darkening | 25 | 10 | 5 | 0 | -5 | -10 | -30 | -50 | None |
| Under eye circles | 15 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | -3 | -5 | -15 | None |
| LEE | 15 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | -5 | -8 | None | |
| Eye colour | 10 | 7 | 5 | Light colour | |||||
| Scleral triangles | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -5 | -10 | -15 | Even triangles |
| Medial canthus | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | -1 | Downturned, long, not thin | |||
| PFL | 20 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 0 | -5 | -10 | -15 | 27mm+ (iris method) |
| Sclera colour | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | White | ||||
| Unibrow | 5 | 3 | 1 | -2 | -5 | -10 | -15 | -30 | None |
| Colouring | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7 | Tier 8 | Ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skin colour | 30 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 0 | Tanned | |||
| Lip colour | 15 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 0 | -3 | Reddish pink | ||
| Eyelash visibility | 15 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | Contrasting + visible | |||
| Eye colour | 20 | 10 | 5 | Light eye colour | |||||
| Hair colour | 25 | 10 | 5 | 0 | Dark colour | ||||
| Eyebrow colour | 20 | 10 | 5 | 0 | Dark colour | ||||
| Sclera whiteness | 10 | 5 | 0 |
| Overall lower third | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7 | Tier 8 | Ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gonions | 40 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 0 | -5 | Flared | |
| Chin shape | 30 | 15 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | -5 | Square | |
| Chin width | 25 | 13 | 7 | 3 | 0 | -5 | Wide | ||
| Ramus length | 35 | 20 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 0 | -5 | Tall | |
| Mandible length | 30 | 15 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 0 | -5 | Long & straight | |
| Mandible shape | 10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -3 | Straight (minimal antegonial notch) |
| Lips | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7 | Tier 8 | Ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lip width | 25 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -5 | Wide | |
| Philtrum length | 20 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -5 | Short (not excessive) | |
| Philtrum ridges | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | -3 | Defined | |||
| Lip fullness | 15 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -5 | Full | |
| Lip health | 15 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -5 | No cracking | |
| Commissures | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | -3 | Slight upturn | |||
| Cupid’s bow | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | -3 | Prominent | |||
| Lip seal | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -3 | Straight, aligned with vermillion border |
| Nose | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7 | Tier 8 | Ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alar width | 15 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -5 | Not wide | |
| Nose bulbosity | 20 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -5 | Low bulbousness | |
| Nasal tip | 25 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -5 | Defined, not droopy | |
| Nostril show | 20 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -5 | Minimal | |
| Nostril flare | 10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | -3 | None | |||
| Dorsum | 5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | -3 | Straight | |||
| Radix projection | 15 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -5 | Projected, visible nasofrontal angle |
| Other misc | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7 | Tier 8 | Ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ears | 15 | 8 | 4 | 0 | -5 | -10 | -20 | -40 | Pinned back |
| Symmetry | 100 | 70 | 50 | 30 | 10 | 0 | -10 | -50 | Minimal asymmetry |
Now how do you calculate this into a 0-100 score?
An ideal, 100% MISC score will hold 1031 points, with these ideal categories:
1. Skin - 160
2. Eyes - 231
3. Colouring - 135
4. Overall lower third - 170
5. Lips - 110
6. Nose - 110
7. Other misc - 115
The worst possible MISC score will hold -460, with these worst categories:
1. Skin - -95
2. Eyes - -186
3. Colouring - 2
4. Overall lower third - -28
5. Lips - -32
6. Nose - -31
7. Other misc - -90
To calculate a total MISC score, use this formula
Code:
((YOURMISC - WORSTMISC) / (MAXMISC - (WORSTMISC)) X 100For example, a misc score of 571 would be:
Code:
((571 - (-460)) / ((1031 - (-460))) X 100 = 69.16Therefore, the person will overally have a 69.16% MISC score, or 6.916/10
3. ANGU formula - calculating an angularity score
The angularity score has the same weight as the dimorphism score - 20%
To calculate it, follow this formula:
| Feature | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7 | Ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mandible Visibility (Front) | 24.75 | 21.04 | 17.33 | 13.61 | 9.90 | 6.19 | 3.09 | Broad mandible flare, clear contour, no lower-face fat masking |
| Facial 3D-ness | 18.75 | 15.94 | 13.13 | 10.33 | 7.52 | 4.71 | 2.36 | Strong midface projection, sharp anterior depth, good orbital support |
| Gonion Sharpness | 18.75 | 15.94] | 13.13 | 10.33 | 7.52 | 4.71 | 2.36 | Well-defined gonial angle (120°–130°), visible edge |
| Facial Depth | 17.25 | 14.66 | 12.08 | 9.49 | 6.91 | 4.33 | 2.17 | Strong maxilla + mandible forward projection |
| Mandible & Ramus Visibility | 16.74 | 14.23 | 11.71 | 9.19 | 6.68 | 4.17 | 2.09 | Long, tall ramus, sharp rear-jaw contour clearly visible from front |
| Ogee Curve | 15.75 | 13.39 | 11.03 | 8.67 | 6.30 | 3.94 | 1.97 | Defined midface curve, strong high cheekbone projection |
| Cheekbone Visibility | 15.11 | 12.85 | 10.58 | 8.32 | 6.05 | 3.79 | 1.89 | High, wide-set malars, strong lateral projection, sharp shadow line (aka. hollow cheeks) |
| Chin Angularity | 12.30 | 10.46 | 8.61 | 6.77 | 4.92 | 3.08 | 1.54 | Squared chin pad, sharp pogonion definition, low convexity |
| Lower-Midface Fat | 10.43 | 8.86 | 7.30 | 5.73 | 4.17 | 3.13 | 1.56 | Minimal buccal fat, sharp lines, lean jaw contour |
To calculate your angularity score, do the exact same calculation as with MISC.
Max score - 149.83
Worst score - 19.03
(example) your score - 71
Code:
((71 - 19.03) / (149.83 - 19.03)) x 100 = 39.73Therefore, this (example) persons angularity score is 39.73%, or 3.973/10
4. DIMO formula - how to a calculate dimorphism score
DIMO, with a weight of 20%, describes how masculine a person is, with 0 being the closest to female-ish features, and 100 usually being a manly ogre.
DIMO is very easily eyeballed with a DIMO chart, but there’s still a rough formula that might be useful to some people
The chart:
The formula:
| Feature | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Ideal (highest masculinity) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eye depth | 22.32 | 16.74 | 11.16 | 0.00 | -33.48 | Very deepset eyes with strong supraorbital projection and obvious orbital shadowing |
| Brow ridge shape | 13.44 | 10.08 | 6.72 | 3.36 | -3.36 | Pronounced brow bossing with a sharp, continuous supraorbital margin. |
| Chin shape | 12.72 | 9.54 | 6.36 | 3.36 | -12.72 | Broad, square chin with forward projection and a strong pogonion. Minimal taper, well-defined horizontal chin plane. |
| Buccal fat size | 11.70 | 8.78 | 5.85 | 2.93 | -2.93 | Very low buccal fat, hollowing beneath the cheekbones, clear cheek/mandible shadowing that enhances male angularity. |
| Ramus length (front) | 11.53 | 8.65 | 5.77 | 2.88 | -2.88 | Tall, visible ramus with strong vertical jaw height producing a long lower face and a dominant jawline from frontal view. |
| Gonion outward growth | 11.04 | 8.28 | 5.52 | 2.76 | -2.76 | Wide gonial flare, laterally projecting jaw angle that creates a broad, V-to-square lower face silhouette. |
| Narrowing upper third | 9.00 | 6.75 | 4.50 | 2.25 | -2.25 | Noticeably narrower upper third (temples to brow) relative to mid/lower face |
| Facial hair development | 7.80 | 5.85 | 3.90 | 1.95 | -1.95 | Dense, coarse facial hair covering jaw, chin and cheeks. full beard or heavy stubble that reinforces masculine lower-face mass. |
| Rough skin texture | 7.20 | 5.40 | 3.60 | 1.80 | -1.80 | Thicker, textured dermis with visible pores/roughness consistent with mature male skin. |
| Cheekbone size | 6.91 | 5.18 | 3.46 | 1.73 | -1.73 | High, laterally projecting malar bones with clear shadow lines beneath cheekbones that support a strong midface and sharp ogee curve. |
| Lip fullness | 6.34 | 4.75 | 3.17 | 1.58 | -1.58 | Relatively thin to average lips (reduced fullness), tighter vermillion border. |
You already know how the score calculation goes.
Max - 120
Worst- -67.44
(example) Your score - 81
Code:
((81 - (-67.44)) / (120 - (-67.44))) x 100 = 79.20Therefore, this persons DIMO score will be 79.20% or 7.92/10
5. HARM formula - how to calculate a harmony score
Harmony is easily the most important facial aesthetic score in here. It holds a whopping 32% overall importance.
The term gets thrown around everywhere, but in reality it’s just your features on a mathematical scale.
Formula:
| Feature | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 | Tier 5 | Tier 6 | Tier 7 | Ideal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaw Width | 20.59 | 18.53 | 10.29 | 6.18 | -18.53 | -46.32 | - | Wide mandible width balanced with cheekbones. horizontally strong lower face |
| Eye to Eyebrow Distance / Eyebrow Setness | 19.83 | 17.84 | 9.91 | 5.95 | -5.95 | -11.90 | - | brows close to eyes without drooping |
| Brow Ridge Inclination Angle | 19.83 | 17.84 | 9.91 | 5.96 | -5.96 | -11.90 | - | smooth but defined brow ridge |
| Facial Thirds | 19.83 | 17.84 | 9.91 | 5.95 | -5.95 | -11.90 | - | 1:1:1 proportion between upper/mid/lower thirds |
| Nasofrontal Angle | 19.06 | 17.16 | 9.53 | 5.72 | -5.72 | -34.31 | - | 125–135° |
| Neck Width | 19.06 | 17.16 | 9.53 | 5.72 | -17.16 | -34.31 | - | Thick neck proportional to jaw width and face size |
| Lower Third Proportion | 18.30 | 16.47 | 9.15 | 5.49 | -5.49 | -10.98 | - | Lower third = ~33-34% of total face height |
| FWHR | 18.30 | 16.47 | 9.15 | 5.49 | -16.47 | -49.41 | - | neither too long nor too wide, between 1.8–2.0 |
| Eye Aspect Ratio | 18.30 | 16.47 | 9.15 | 5.49 | -5.49 | -10.98 | - | Almond shaped eyes with slight lateral taper |
| Gonial Angle | 16.78 | 15.10 | 8.39 | 5.03 | -10.07 | -20.13 | - | ~120° |
| Ramus Length | 14.41 | 14.41 | 8.01 | 5.80 | -10.59 | -20.13 | - | Long ramus with strong vertical jaw height |
| Thirds of Jaw | 17.54 | 15.78 | 8.77 | 6.48 | -3.89 | -23.35 | - | Symmetric vertical jaw thirds and a balanced mandible height |
| Chin to Philtrum Ratio | 12.96 | 11.67 | 6.48 | 3.89 | -1.95 | -3.89 | - | Short philtrum with proportional chin height (preferebly ~1:2) |
| Lateral Canthal Tilt | 12.35 | 11.12 | 6.18 | 3.71 | -3.71 | -7.4 | - | Positive 3+ degrees lateral tilt |
| Mouth to Nose Ratio | 12.35 | 11.12 | 6.18 | 3.71 | -3.71 | -7.4 | - | Balanced width between nose base and mouth corners, preferably 1:1.6 |
| Eye Separation/esr | 12.20 | 10.98 | 6.59 | 3.66 | -10.98 | -65.88 | - | IPD at ~62-65 mm, ESR at 46-50% |
| Midface Ratio | 11.90 | 10.71 | 5.95 | 3.57 | -3.57 | -7.14 | - | Short/mid midface height centered around 47-50mm |
| Jaw Frontal Angle | 9.15 | 8.24 | 4.58 | 2.75 | -4.58 | -9.15 | - | Strong frontal jawline angle without tapering inward |
| Cheekbone Setness | 20 | 10 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 | - | High, laterally projecting zygos with visible ogee curve |
| Face Length | 20 | 10 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 | - | Proportionate long face without vertical excess |
| Bizygomatic Width | 20 | 10 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 | - | Strong cheekbone width of 140-150 mm |
| Nose to Bizygomatic Ratio | 7 | 3.75 | 1.88 | 0.94 | 0 | -0.94 | - | Nose width ~70% of cheekbone width |
| Eyebrow Tilt | 10 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 | -5 | - | Neutral to slightly upward lateral brow rise |
| Medial Canthal Angle | 7.5 | 3.75 | 1.88 | 0 | -1.88 | -3.75 | - | Symmetric medial canthi forming subtle inward angle |
| Bitemporal Width | 7.5 | 3.75 | 1.88 | 0 | -1.88 | -3.75 | - | Strong but not overly wide temples |
| Lower Third Proportion | 5 | 2.5 | 1.25 | 0 | -1.25 | -2.5 | - | Evenly divided between all thirds. |
MAX score - 389.74
WORST score - -409.92
(example) your score - 110
Code:
((110−(−409.92)) / (389.74−(−409.92))) x 100 = 64.99Therefore, this (example) persons harmony score is 64.99, or 6.499/10
6. Overall facial score
We will take all the example scores we already made:
HARM - 64.99%, or 6.499/10
DIMO - 79.20%, or 7.92/10
ANGU - 39.73%, or 3.973/10
MISC - 69.16%, or 6.916/10
And make an overall facial analysis score using a corrected and more accurate calculation:
Weights:
32% harmony
26% misc
22% ang
20% dimo
Step 1 - Calculate weighted average (we will call it 'W'):
Code:
Harmony: 6.499 x 0.32 = 2.07968
MISC: 6.916 x 0.26 = 1.79716
ANGU: 3.973 x 0.22 = 0.87406
DIMO: 7.92 x 0.20 = 1.58400
W = 2.07968 + 1.79716 + 0.87406 + 1.58400
W = 6.33490Step 2 - Calculate spread between best and worst category:
Code:
Highest score = DIMO = 7.92
Lowest score = ANGU = 3.973
SPREAD = 7.92 - 3.973 = 3.947Step 3 - Apply harmony imbalance penalty:
Code:
Penalty = SPREAD x 0.5
Penalty = 3.947 x 0.5 = 1.9735
TRUE SCORE = W - Penalty
TRUE SCORE = 6.33490 - 1.9735 = 4.3614With all of this, our example person is a 4.36/10
WHY DO WE DO THE PENALTY - In real life, our faces are percieved by balance and cohesion, a score without a penalty completely eliminated that and assumes everything is linear (which it isn't)
for example, someone with this score:
Harmony 7.5, DIMO 7.4, ANGU 7.2, MISC 7.3
Will be seen as very high tier, obviously, they've got very good features.
But then comes someone like this:
Harmony 8.8, DIMO 3.9, ANGU 4.1, MISC 7.0
And without the penatly they will be seen as comparable to the first guy, because their harmony carries, despite all their features being simply shit.
(bonus) how to measure ratios easily
Best way to measure ratios is to use the line tool in a photoshop app (or for example paint.net), then dividing those pixels to get a structured ratio.
@Randomized Shame @Daddy's Home @TechnoBoss @NumbThePain @Hernan
Last edited:
