A bloatlord — depending on how his bloat is distributed — could potentially evoke respect and fear. But the quintessential mogger evokes the holy t

D

Deleted member 17829

Kraken
Joined
Feb 16, 2022
Posts
10,148
Reputation
15,934
Wanting to be mired for abs is vain as they're purely aesthetic. But the sizemog which evokes respect and fear is pure 300,000+ year-old intrasexual selection instinct atavism.

The holy trinity of mogging — admiration, respect and fear. Like the lion — admired for his aesthetics and majesty, respected and feared for his size and strength

A man with an aesthetic physique evokes admiration and potentially some respect.

A bloatlord — depending on how his bloat is distributed — could potentially evoke respect and fear.

But the quintessential mogger evokes the holy trinity of admiration, respect and fear.

@prettyboislime thoughts
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: currylightskin, Elvisandreaa, Deleted member 17244 and 2 others
It sound like u talkin bout a video game
 
take the bloat pill
Th 3869793629
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kingcel32, BoneDensity and Dystopian
1657657667677
1657657695607

lack of size is the worst form of ugliness
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: mvp2v1, Constantin Denis, ItsOverCel and 3 others
My bloat distributes as glycogen in muscles so they get swollen
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 17829
Wanting to be mired for abs is vain as they're purely aesthetic. But the sizemog which evokes respect and fear is pure 300,000+ year-old intrasexual selection instinct atavism.
  • Human mate selection is intersexual, not intrasexual.
  • Low bodyfat (abs) isn't purely aesthetic. Low bodyfat entails better agility and general fitness.
  • Female attraction for low bodyfat (abs) is also an atavic instinct, related to the previous point.
  • Females don't care about men who evoke "respect and fear". That's mostly a male power fantasy. They are perfectly content with a man they find attractive, regardless of whether or not other men fear him, respect him, or can beat him up. This is a typical male gaze vs female gaze scenario.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, Kingcel32, Elvisandreaa and 2 others
Human mate selection is intersexual, not intrasexual.
for the last 300,00 years its been intra. you cant just wipe that from their brains

Females don't care about men who evoke "respect and fear". That's mostly a male power fantasy. They are perfectly content with a man they find attractive, regardless of whether or not other mean fear him, respect him, or can beat him up. This is a typical male gaze vs female gaze scenario.
they 100% do. thats a big reason they select for height as the no.1 thing. and foids always resort back to physical domiannce hierarchies and shit like "my boyfriend could beat you up"
 
for the last 300,00 years its been intra. you cant just wipe that from their brains
It really hasn't. Females have historically always been into the same type of guys, but ever since we estabilished structured societies, they've been forced to accept whatever the men decided. They couldn't live without a man, so they had to marry whatever man had the most resources, or were forced to marry men they disliked because... well, because men are physically and socially stronger.

Fast forward 2000 years: women can now work and support themselves. They are free to choose their mate based on personal taste, rather than necessity. And what type of men is most popular with women in a fertile age range? Definitely not bloatlords.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, Kingcel32, Elvisandreaa and 1 other person
They are perfectly content with a man they find attractive, regardless of whether or not other mean fear him, respect him, or can beat him up
nope. Never get beat up in front of your girl. You will loose all respect. Not just from her but from everyone else.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kingcel32 and Deleted member 17829
nope. Never get beat up in front of your girl. You will loose all respect. Not just from her but from everyone else.
Maybe. But she won't hook up with a bloatlord just because he beat up their boyfriend.
Physical dominance isn't enough to warrant attraction; physical attractiveness IS.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, Kingcel32, Moggie and 2 others
It really hasn't. Females have historically always been into the same type of guys, but ever since we estabilished structured societies, they've been forced to accept whatever the men decided. They couldn't live without a man, so they had to marry whatever man had the most resources, or were forced to marry men they disliked because... well, because men are physically and socially stronger.

Fast forward 2000 years: women can now work and support themselves. They are free to choose their mate based on personal taste, rather than necessity. And what type of men is most popular with women in a fertile age range? Definitely not bloatlords.
BEHOLD! a Tails blackpill copypasta
you lack analazyng skills and copy what a german base dweler says, pure PSL autism, havent grabbed a book of evolutionary psychology once in his life ¨muh female gaze, muh male gaze¨
 
  • +1
Reactions: Elvisandreaa
dnrd just get LL
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 17829
BEHOLD! a Tails blackpill copypasta
you lack analazyng skills and copy what a german base dweler says, pure PSL autism, havent grabbed a book of evolutionary psychology once in his life ¨muh female gaze, muh male gaze¨
You can't even spell "analyze" correctly. That says enough about the quality of your observations.
 
  • Human mate selection is intersexual, not intrasexual.
  • Low bodyfat (abs) isn't purely aesthetic. Low bodyfat entails better agility and general fitness.
  • Female attraction for low bodyfat (abs) is also an atavic instinct, related to the previous point.
  • Females don't care about men who evoke "respect and fear". That's mostly a male power fantasy. They are perfectly content with a man they find attractive, regardless of whether or not other men fear him, respect him, or can beat him up. This is a typical male gaze vs female gaze scenario.
Women definitely prefer to have lethal oneitis rather than someone who has low chance of winning a fight. If their oneitis can't fight they will have protection fetish and they will go out of their way to defend their oneitis whether he is dangerous or not.
 

Similar threads

D
Replies
6
Views
311
Deleted member 15827
Deleted member 15827

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top