a question for renowned looks theorists here

[Deleted member 116873]

in the context of the main dogmas of this site:
1. looks are objective (and everything)
2. men can be classified to truecels, incels, ltns, mtns, htns, chadlites, chads, and gigachads,

is the first dogma really grounded in reality if not even the resident looks experts can agree on whether a certain guy is a mtn or a chadlite unless they have additional information about their status, money, personality/aura/charisma to help them decide?

 

[Deleted member 116873]

an unanswered question, it seems

 

[Org3cel]

in the context of the main dogmas of this site:
1. looks are objective (and everything)
2. men can be classified to truecels, incels, ltns, mtns, htns, chadlites, chads, and gigachads,

is the first dogma really grounded in reality if not even the resident looks experts can agree on whether a certain guy is a mtn or a chadlite unless they have additional information about their status, money, personality/aura/charisma to help them decide?

Looks are objective
Yes they can
They are rated based off their face, not height personality or fucking anything else, you can rate them as an overral, because of the halo that height and money can give

 

[Deleted member 116873]

Looks are objective
Yes they can
They are rated based off their face, not height personality or fucking anything else, you can rate them as an overral, because of the halo that height and money can give

i'm talking exactly about face comparisons. there would be 0 consensus about a guy's face category on this forum for every man on earth

if someone posted a pic of young gosling as his to get rated, without anyone knowing who he is, most experts would tell him "it never began", that he has a "typical incel pheno", or recommend 12 surgeries to him.

 

[Org3cel]

i'm talking exactly about face comparisons. there would be 0 consensus about a guy's face category on this forum for every man on earth

Yes it would, there is no such thing as human opinion, its almost pure math

 

[Bug]

It is a range just like how tall is 6ft2-6ft5+
or short is 5ft3-5ft7

but we can look at your face and determine your range, whether it's LTN-MTN face exactly is subjective but the range is what matters, that's objective based on your features

 

[cytoplasm]

Yes it would, there is no such thing as human opinion, its almost pure math

Kindergarden level math

 

[Deleted member 107430]

finally not a water post

 

[Deleted member 67937]

Looks are objective and subjective

 

[Deleted member 44222]

There should only be 3 tiers: sub-5, normie and Chad. This is how it is IRL.