A reminder that even if you are a chad women would still lose interest in you

Spartacus1-

Spartacus1-

The world is yours
Joined
Jul 3, 2019
Posts
4,161
Reputation
7,727
People who say that they want to surgerymaxx then settle for an ltr always make me chuckle at how naive they are of what truly the situation is and how disadvantageous is it for men.

A woman's ultimate purpose is to fulfill her nature engraved duty, which is to pass on genetic information to a newer generation for the continuity of the human race. And as we all know the better the information is the more desirable you are to women. So naturally, they pursue chad. Once they get chad through and pass on his genes a switch deeply buried in their brains turns on, like a bright lamp hard to miss unconsciously signaling to the female that her mission is accomplished and she should seek more proper quality candidates to spread out the human gene as far as possible with it increasing the chances for human survival.

With the switch turned on the female will automatically lose interest in her current mate and start distancing herself from him to let him know that his duty as a male has finished and it's time for him to move on.

This phenomenon is something naturally inscribed in human nature and therefore is unavoidable. An interesting study observes this behavior and confirms my hypothesis


• Study shows that once a women 'bonds' or knows she has fully secured her mates commitment she will lose interest in sex. But women, he said, have evolved to have a high sex drive when they are initially in a relationship in order to form a "pair bond" with their partner. But, once this bond is sealed a woman's sexual appetite declines, he added.

TL;Dr it's over regardless of whether you're chad or incel if you consider an LTR best option is to pump and dump.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: FreakkForLife, Lmao, Frank Jack and 12 others
B-b-but muh slaying is childish and will leave you unfulfilled

Yeah and the alternative is being cucked/fucked over in an LTR
 
  • +1
  • So Sad
  • JFL
Reactions: FreakkForLife, Lmao, Be_ConfidentBro and 6 others
This isn't how it works, there are tons of old couples that love each other that easily debunk such a stupid theory. Humans are way more complex animals then the rest, and even then Gorillas our 3rd closest relatives are monogamous and kill off the offspring of the previous male if they win over his women. Humans are a mix of all our other ape relatives, a human can be naturally like in the OP or monogamous too
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • WTF
Reactions: Deleted member 13787, Eduardo DOV, Pnpm and 9 others
People who say that they want to surgerymaxx then settle for an ltr always make me chuckle at how naive they are of what truly the situation is and how disadvantageous is it for men.

A woman's ultimate purpose is to fulfill her nature engraved duty, which is to pass on genetic information to a newer generation for the continuity of the human race. And as we all know the better the information is the more desirable you are to women. So naturally, they pursue chad. Once they get chad through and pass on his genes a switch deeply buried in their brains turns on, like a bright lamp hard to miss unconsciously signaling to the female that her mission is accomplished and she should seek more proper quality candidates to spread out the human gene as far as possible with it increasing the chances for human survival.

With the switch turned on the female will automatically lose interest in her current mate and start distancing herself from him to let him know that his duty as a male has finished and it's time for him to move on.

This phenomenon is something naturally inscribed in human nature and therefore is unavoidable. An interesting study observes this behavior and confirms my hypothesis


• Study shows that once a women 'bonds' or knows she has fully secured her mates commitment she will lose interest in sex. But women, he said, have evolved to have a high sex drive when they are initially in a relationship in order to form a "pair bond" with their partner. But, once this bond is sealed a woman's sexual appetite declines, he added.

TL;Dr it's over regardless of whether you're chad or incel if you consider an LTR best option is to pump and dump.
I just want to surgerymaxx so i could post Instagram selfies ffs
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Eduardo DOV, Pnpm, Be_ConfidentBro and 2 others
This isn't how it works, there are tons of old couples that love each other that easily debunk such a stupid theory. Humans are way more complex animals then the rest, and even then Gorillas our 3rd closest relatives are monogamous and kill off the offspring of the previous male if they win over his women. Humans are a mix of all our other ape relatives, a human can be naturally like in the OP or monogamous too
Love? How can you measure it? How are you so certain that the reason for the longevity of those specific cases is love and not a mix of different circumstances compelling them to stay together? Monogamy was built for a society where humans can't surpass ages beyond 30 so the time the mates stay together is considerably lower than that of modern time. 10 years of relationship is much shorter and tolerable than let's say 40 years that the current age allows. And you can see that currently where couples can't last longer than a year before divorcing and then marrying again after a year with new partners or so just to repeat the cycle and separate. I made a thread that tackles this subject actually jfl

It's true though that humans are complex beings with unpredictability and far away from the simplicity of animal behavior. But they fall under patterns that you can study and expect to repeat that's called psychology you should check it out sometime.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: thickdickdaddy27 and TsarTsar444
Love? How can you measure it? How are you so certain that the reason for the longevity of those specific cases is love and not a mix of different circumstances compelling them to stay together? Monogamy was built for a society where humans can't surpass ages beyond 30 so the time the mates stay together is considerably lower than that of modern time. 10 years of relationship is much shorter and tolerable than let's say 40 years that the current age allows. And you can see that currently where couples can't last longer than a year before divorcing and then marrying again after a year with new partners or so just to repeat the cycle and separate. I made a thread that tackles this subject actually jfl

It's true though that humans are complex beings with unpredictability and far away from the simplicity of animal behavior. But they fall under patterns that you can study and except to repeat that's called physiology you should check it out sometime.
Yes but humans can still be monogamous, we are extremely flexible compared to other animals. My mom even after 30 years still cried like hell when my dad was in a car accident, she many times says how she loves him. Humans are super complex, other animals pale in comparison.

And about 10% of birds are completely monogamous, like the Albatross
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 13787, FreakkForLife, Be_ConfidentBro and 4 others
over
 
  • +1
Reactions: oldcelloser
Life is complex, you do hear stories of people being happily married for 50+ years. Its possible its just rare because both people have to make compromises. You also have to have similliar life goals, which can't change drastically over the course of your life.

There is alot which can go wrong, but its possible for you to find a life partner. I just wouldn't expect to find one. If you do, you have got lucky.

The issue is that the general narritive nowadays doesn't support people having LTR's. The media celebrates short term relationships and infidelity, because cheating on somebody or having a hookup with chad/stacy on holiday is more exciting then a 50 year happy marriage. The latter is mundane compared to the former options. This narritive applies to both genders but its harder for guys to be promiscous. You need looks and low inhibition which is hard to come by.

Another narritive of females always being correct and being the vicitims in a relationshit is also counter productive. Some women aren't going to work through their problems if the media tells them they are never wrong.

Finally people also let themsevles go to easily due to the bluepilled narritive that looks don't matter. On average people were in better shape in the past due to there being less opportunities to rot. More people would have worked manual labour and their would have been no ldar activities such as video games or TV. Food would have been harder to come by so you won't get 300lbs landwhales roaming the earth.

Reminder that this was the fattest person on the planet in 1903. You could find multiple people this fat daily. "Buu-t I have a thyroid problem".
1627695138444
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lmao, Be_ConfidentBro, Effortless and 2 others
ltrs are cope but you're still autistic
 
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Be_ConfidentBro and Prettyboy
Girl messaged me this obviously pissed off after I ghosted her for weeks, I live rent free inside their skulls
2C4B96BE 0C71 4976 902A 4422C52B3DFA
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Be_ConfidentBro
LTRs are cope and for beta low t soys tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: Be_ConfidentBro and Prettyboy
Love? How can you measure it? How are you so certain that the reason for the longevity of those specific cases is love and not a mix of different circumstances compelling them to stay together? Monogamy was built for a society where humans can't surpass ages beyond 30 so the time the mates stay together is considerably lower than that of modern time. 10 years of relationship is much shorter and tolerable than let's say 40 years that the current age allows. And you can see that currently where couples can't last longer than a year before divorcing and then marrying again after a year with new partners or so just to repeat the cycle and separate. I made a thread that tackles this subject actually jfl

It's true though that humans are complex beings with unpredictability and far away from the simplicity of animal behavior. But they fall under patterns that you can study and expect to repeat that's called psychology you should check it out sometime.
divorce should be prohibited, just as it used to be. What's your proposal? A "All for Sex" society? you are a cancer tbh.
 
marriage and family formation should be taken very seriously, and divorce prohibited.
 
This isn't how it works, there are tons of old couples that love each other that easily debunk such a stupid theory. Humans are way more complex animals then the rest, and even then Gorillas our 3rd closest relatives are monogamous and kill off the offspring of the previous male if they win over his women. Humans are a mix of all our other ape relatives, a human can be naturally like in the OP or monogamous too
So what do you suggest ? Killing offspring doesn’t seem to be Neither legal nor beneficial. It would at best make her more financially dependant due to lack of child support payments.
 
the man also loses sexual interest in the woman over time, it is up to the individual to make an effort not to give in to his animal nature.
and society to create laws to repress this animal nature.
 
the man also loses sexual interest in the woman over time, it is up to the individual to make an effort not to give in to his animal nature.
and society to create laws to repress this animal nature.
Marriage is not longer about love, is about sharing income and resources.
There’s also the social pressure about tightening the knot, also people gain some status for baking married.
But following norms doesn’t always mean happiness. :feelsez:
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

yandex99
Replies
17
Views
1K
forevergymcelling
forevergymcelling
Acromegaly_Chad
Replies
9
Views
605
CookieGuy
CookieGuy
Sloppyseconds
Replies
34
Views
2K
WINGLESS ANGEL
WINGLESS ANGEL

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top