A theoretical technology to ascend completely without surgery on any face

Aypo129

Aypo129

Luminary
Joined
Jul 25, 2022
Posts
7,951
Reputation
10,509
I feel like discussing one of the ideas I have regarding creating a face rather than trying to make our face better

I want this discussion and others to think about it too and overall improve it

A lot of us have all heard of hyperrealistic sillicon mask before.
These mask wore on the face with a set to look like someone else, a rather crude display mask that is heavy and can't move along with face, moreover not too realistic in any sense of the word


A good example of what I am talking about

A rather good upgrade of these mask are found in professional anaplastologist labs aka medical hardware prosthetic for face
Thinner than these mask and utterly realistic
1767673081390


1767673114536


I was thinking around this concept
Technically what makes a mask/prosthetic work?
Well three components
1).Structural integrity
2).Optical realism
3).face attachment

I got around several concepts of face to come up with a solution

Here are they:-
1).Subsurface scattering- a human face diffuses light rather than reflecting light a very important aspect of our face that is not found on other faces
What is the requirement for subsurface scattering
The mask must be thin less than 700 microns thin with gradient

2).Refractive index:- skin has a refractive index of 1.37 to 1.45 it must have these values

3). Structural topography
The mask must have a state with low young modulus capable of streching 35% with low hysterisis

4).bonding:- mask must bond to face no problem asked

5). Must feel like skin

Now I have described the problem, let's discuss possible solutions
 
I feel like discussing one of the ideas I have regarding creating a face rather than trying to make our face better

I want this discussion and others to think about it too and overall improve it

A lot of us have all heard of hyperrealistic sillicon mask before.
These mask wore on the face with a set to look like someone else, a rather crude display mask that is heavy and can't move along with face, moreover not too realistic in any sense of the word


A good example of what I am talking about

A rather good upgrade of these mask are found in professional anaplastologist labs aka medical hardware prosthetic for face
Thinner than these mask and utterly realistic
View attachment 4509422

View attachment 4509423

I was thinking around this concept
Technically what makes a mask/prosthetic work?
Well three components
1).Structural integrity
2).Optical realism
3).face attachment

I got around several concepts of face to come up with a solution

Here are they:-
1).Subsurface scattering- a human face diffuses light rather than reflecting light a very important aspect of our face that is not found on other faces
What is the requirement for subsurface scattering
The mask must be thin less than 700 microns thin with gradient

2).Refractive index:- skin has a refractive index of 1.37 to 1.45 it must have these values

3). Structural topography
The mask must have a state with low young modulus capable of streching 35% with low hysterisis

4).bonding:- mask must bond to face no problem asked

5). Must feel like skin

Now I have described the problem, let's discuss possible solutions

dnr most of this but are u implying making face masks,

this might be the most robotic org thread oat
 
  • +1
Reactions: duromaxxing, Jgns, yussimania and 2 others
I see the vision but this is the most udder autistic post I’ve ever seen
 
  • +1
Reactions: duromaxxing, BR32, idont and 1 other person
eh, implants/osteos will always be superior because its under the hood; supports real, physical soft tissue/bone, this is just overlaying it, its like painting the implant your skin color/soft tissue, and placing it on your skin, instead of inside of it, kinda useless
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
There is a possible way to do it and I have a theoretical framework for it

Here is what I am suggesting

Using XPL to create hybrid soft-hard layer

What is XPL second skin
It's a siloxane based agent that can has young modulus lower than skin and can stretch upto 300% of its original size

Here's what I am thinking
We know it's possible to convert siloxane agents with chemistry so I learned a bit of chemistry to think of molding it


In standard soft silicone, the polymer chains are long and have few connections (cross-links). Imagine a bowl of oily spaghetti—it moves easily. To make "Hard XPL," we need to turn that spaghetti into a tight "fishing net."

The "MQ Resin" Integration
The most effective way to harden silicone without making it brittle is to introduce MQ Resins (Trimethylsiloxysilicate).

The Structure: These are 3D "cages" of silicone and oxygen (SiO 4/2 and R3 SiO
1/2 units).

When mixed into the XPL base, these cages act as "molecular ball bearings" that eventually lock together. They provide the "Hard" structure while remaining chemically compatible with the "Soft" XPL layer.

Here is what chemistry hardness look like
1767674251272

To reach the Shore A 30+ target for your dye-sublimation layer, the "Hard XPL" formula would look like this:

Step A: Increase the Cross-link Density
We increase the ratio of the Hydride-functional cross-linker to the Vinyl-terminated polymer. In a standard soft mix, the ratio might be 1:1. For Hard XPL, we move to a 1.5:1 or 2:1 ratio. The hydrosilylation reaction looks like this:

≡Si−H+CH
2
=CH−Si≡
Pt
≡Si−CH
2
−CH
2 −Si≡
By adding more Si−H (Hydride) sites, we create more "bridges," which increases the Elastic Modulus (stiffness).

Step B: Fillers for Tear Strength (Fumed Silica)
Pure XPL is clear but weak. To make it a "Hard" mask, we must add Surface-Treated Fumed Silica (SiO 2 )

t: The silica must be treated with Hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS).

Why: If the silica isn't treated, the mask will become "clumpy." Treated silica allows the "Hard XPL" to remain smooth enough for your 500-micron mold while providing the stiffness needed for the outer shell.


The most difficult part of simulation is how to make the Hard layer transition into the Soft layer without a visible "seam."

The "Green-State" Diffusion Technique
Cast the Hard XPL: Pour the 200-micron "Hard" layer into the mold.

Partial Cure: Wait until it reaches the "Tacky" or "Green" state (roughly 60-70% cured).

Cast the Soft XPL: Pour the "Soft" layer directly onto the tacky hard layer.

Molecular Entanglement: Because the Hard layer isn't fully cured, the "Soft" polymer chains will physically migrate into the "Hard" matrix.

Final Cure: The Platinum catalyst finishes the job, locking the two layers together with covalent bonds.

4. Sublimation Readiness: The "Polar" Modification
Silicones are notoriously "non-stick" (low surface energy). Dyes usually slide right off. To make the "Hard XPL" accept dye sublimation:

The Simulation: We would graft Phenyl groups or Allyl-polyester chains into the Hard XPL formula.

The Result: This creates "pockets" in the silicone structure that can trap the gaseous dye molecules during the heat-transfer process. This is what allows the hyperrealistic skin texture to become a permanent part of the material.

Technical Summary for your IIT Team
If you hand them this "Simulation Report," they will know exactly what to do:

Polymer Base: Vinyl-terminated Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS).

Hardener: Trimethylsiloxysilicate (MQ Resin) at 20-30% concentration.

Cross-linker: Methyl-hydro-siloxane copolymer (aiming for high SiH:Vinyl ratio).

Reinforcement: 10-15% HMDS-treated Fumed Silica.

Aesthetic Layering: 500-micron total thickness with a Functionally Graded transition.

This Hard XPL is essentially a "Ceramic-Silicone Hybrid"—it has the durability of a shell but the chemistry of a second skin.
 
  • +1
Reactions: BR32
eh, implants/osteos will always be superior because its under the hood; supports real, physical soft tissue/bone, this is just overlaying it, its like painting the implant into your skin, and placing it on your skin, instead of inside of it, kinda useless
No this is utterly superior to implants infact
I am not talking merely about changing bone contrary changing the fat structure itself by overlaying a new face

A face off mask like a tom cruise mission impossible mask
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: esoterik
The possible questions that are supposed to be solved is two tier
1). If one created a mask that is let's say 600 microns thick
Then what would happen to the structural integrity of the mask
Would it require a exoskeleton

2). Optical properties
Should the face be done by pigments loading or a dye sublimation transfer
 
Heres what dye sublimation transfer looks like on prosthetic
1767674610578

One of these eyes is fake
If you can tell which one then comment me
 
  • +1
Reactions: BR32
No this is utterly superior to implants infact
I am not talking merely about changing bone contrary changing the fat structure itself by overlaying a new face

A face off mask like a tom cruise mission impossible mask
"by overlying a new face" this is so unpractical in daily life lol, and there are alot of limitations (dimensional, ware, etc) there is a reason it is localized to a region
 
"by overlying a new face" this is so unpractical in daily life lol, and there are alot of limitations (dimensional, ware, etc) there is a reason it is localized to a region
That's the whole point of trying to solve structural integrity
There is a question of composition
If the mask can made it hard soft gradient layer than the facial topography can be solved by generative ai
It would be in a sense adding a face rather than laying a face
Adhesive is not a problem
 
I'll bite

Tell me more doc
It's a question about evolution of general standard sillicon prosthetic
There is more idea to how to achieve structure integration
Here in my opinion one way to solve
A integrated Scaffold with tip of local stem cell
The stem cell part injected into face after face layer has been blown by common co2 laser
Imagine for example how a bridge works
It's a flat surface lying on multiple beams
Imagine if you similar beams hundreds localised on face per cm^2 with tiles or gradient layer on them
Thats artitechure
1767675013411

Thats one method
 
Other method will be something like a face cage
Imagine a face cage that can hold of and give shape to hydrogel and second skin mold

This is in my opinion in realm of possibilities
 
Give of your ideas on this theoretical tech

It doesn't hurt or pay to think @Jason Voorhees
 
Last edited:
I skimmed over all of ur stuff in the thread and I want to know what’s the end goal here, is this purely theoretical, are you planning yourself on making these molds for urself or to sell on the market
Ur quite high iq if this all subjugated from urself btw I admire the effort
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
I skimmed over all of ur stuff in the thread and I want to know what’s the end goal here, is this purely theoretical, are you planning yourself on making these molds for urself or to sell on the market
Ur quite high iq if this all subjugated from urself btw I admire the effort
Eventually planning to do both
Overall
There are some more methods I have discovered
True vat polymerization polygon mapping sillicon tiles

You have to understand until very recently these were not possible
Only in 2015 some of these tech were developed and only in 2022 some of these tech matured enough to be usable

It's possible and imperial now that I do this
 
  • Love it
Reactions: sub5gymcel
Just hide that part of face by cloth, use masks

I don't understand why everyone wants to look average
 
  • +1
Reactions: Aypo129
True vat polymerization developed in 2015 is now capable of creating lattices as small at 5-25 microns
A sample
1767925539293

The single smallest strut is as small as 3 microns
1767925468983

These are so light that they can immediately follow your face anisotropy
New polymers mixed with acrylic stereohardness and sillicon hyperrealistic optical properties can be made now
 
Last edited:
Is the thing I am saying never done before?
No
Just it doesn't happen to us but it exist in various forms of biology

Think about a leaf for example
A leaf cannot be more thick that some 200 microns or more or all the wavelength of light would be immediately trapped causing underlying leaves and stem to die from shadow

Yet it being so incredibly thin would cause it to easily collapse

This means one and one thing that leaf have to create a sort of very thin structure that will make sure that leaf substrate will not just immediately collapse but also when you tear one part of leaf, it doesn't immediately leads to all of the leaf being ripped apart

This is done through venation

And just when you think venation is only purely biologically possible
Not anymore


Now even before curing,matrix ink for deposition is happening side by side to create the exact stiffness we want
 

Similar threads

pio
Replies
35
Views
3K
swordsinsanee
swordsinsanee
BucketCrab
Replies
45
Views
15K
iamgoingtoascend
iamgoingtoascend
D
Replies
44
Views
26K
cometohaunted
cometohaunted

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top