A traditional society and family can only exist if women are oppressed

JBcollector

JBcollector

Kraken
Joined
Jun 8, 2022
Posts
13,498
Reputation
12,778
Tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: AverageTevvezFan, hiwasuwor, Deleted member 21620 and 3 others
"Oppressed" isn't the right word - its what they consider oppression - we know what you mean though. Women being in charge of the domestic life, raising children and caring for a family is not oppression at all, but loving.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: EverythingMattersCel, Hades, hiwasuwor and 5 others
Agreed, they're far too cruel in nature under normal circumstances!
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 21620 and thecel
"Oppressed" isn't the right word - its what they consider oppression - we know what you mean though. Women being in charge of the domestic life, raising children and caring for a family is not oppression at all, but loving.
why do they consider the housewife role to be oppression though
could it be simply be because theyre told its "oppression" or they genuinely do not enjoy being housewifes
because the alternatives are wageslaving or being cannon fodder in a pointless war and i dont see why they want that so called "freedom"
 
  • Woah
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: hiwasuwor, JBcollector, thecel and 1 other person
"Oppressed" isn't the right word - its what they consider oppression - we know what you mean though. Women being in charge of the domestic life, raising children and caring for a family is not oppression at all, but loving.
Why would any women choose
That ovover a life of constant validation from simps and multiple gl men
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21620 and Deleted member 21340
By nature, womrn can’t be oppressed, even when they didn’t have the right to vote and had to stay in the kitchen they still had it better than men cuz they’re biologically valuable and we are not. Women in traditionalists societies don’t have to die in war, work manual labor dangerous jobs, provide for a family or anything like that. Even when women have less rights than men they still have it better. Women can’t be oppressed
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21620
why do they consider the housewife role to be oppression though
could it be simply be because theyre told its "oppression" or they genuinely do not enjoy being housewifes
because the alternatives are wageslaving or being cannon fodder in a pointless war and i dont see why they want that so called "freedom"
Women have very little to no ability to distinguish advertising and propaganda from genuine good-natured intent - remember that most marketing is aimed towards women, why? Because they fall for it at a far higher rate than men. The people who run the global media and governments (pagans, satanists, "large noses") have a vested interest in destroying the nuclear family as that is the greatest threat to their earthly kingdom. The family and the father supercedes government and earthly rulers, and the elites can't have that.

I agree with you somewhat on a microcosmic level - being a housewife is preferential to being a wagie for the vast majority of women. That said, I don't think we should trivialize the role, both because it's important and second because its thankless in today's post modern culture.

See this post:
Why would any women choose
That ovover a life of constant validation from simps and multiple gl men
Women are easily tempted by the idea of a higher dosage of superficial validation. To a vague extent its hard to blame them, you and I both love validation too (though I believe we are probably far more deprived). The validation they get from bearing children and raising them brings much more joy then being validated by worthless men. Women, regardless of what they do, will get some level of validation by doing nothing more than being present and alive, so the ideal route for them is housewife who gets validation from men in a civil way.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21620
Women have very little to no ability to distinguish advertising and propaganda from genuine good-natured intent - remember that most marketing is aimed towards women, why? Because they fall for it at a far higher rate than men. The people who run the global media and governments (pagans, satanists, "large noses") have a vested interest in destroying the nuclear family as that is the greatest threat to their earthly kingdom. The family and the father supercedes government and earthly rulers, and the elites can't have that.

I agree with you somewhat on a microcosmic level - being a housewife is preferential to being a wagie for the vast majority of women. That said, I don't think we should trivialize the role, both because it's important and second because its thankless in today's post modern culture.

See this post:

Women are easily tempted by the idea of a higher dosage of superficial validation. To a vague extent its hard to blame them, you and I both love validation too (though I believe we are probably far more deprived). The validation they get from bearing children and raising them brings much more joy then being validated by worthless men. Women, regardless of what they do, will get some level of validation by doing nothing more than being present and alive, so the ideal route for them is housewife who gets validation from men in a civil way.
see the whole ebil heckin joos secretly running the world behind closed doors theory seems somewhat rational until you realise the endgoal of said earthly kingdom is essentially brazil, so i dont really buy into the jewish question solely due to the fact if they were intelligent enough to dethrone the entirety of the qest and modify it to their will they wouldnt create latam 2.0 but on a slightly bigger scale

nonetheless i dont see how you came to the conclusion that the ideal route is to become a housewife and when the apparent goal is to attain validation. when we take into account quick hits of dopamine such as matches on tinder are largely preferred in comparison to achieving long term goals, such as giving birth and raising a family, hence why addiction is so common. although women most likely do want to receive the validation from bearing children on top of the plethora amounts of superficial validation they'll recieve while in their early twenties (i.e their prime) hence why the whole "fuck chad until im 30 and then settle down with betabuxx normie" phenomenon exists as then they'll get the best of both worlds
 
  • +1
Reactions: SLA
Women have very little to no ability to distinguish advertising and propaganda from genuine good-natured intent - remember that most marketing is aimed towards women, why? Because they fall for it at a far higher rate than men. The people who run the global media and governments (pagans, satanists, "large noses") have a vested interest in destroying the nuclear family as that is the greatest threat to their earthly kingdom. The family and the father supercedes government and earthly rulers, and the elites can't have that.

I agree with you somewhat on a microcosmic level - being a housewife is preferential to being a wagie for the vast majority of women. That said, I don't think we should trivialize the role, both because it's important and second because its thankless in today's post modern culture.

See this post:

Women are easily tempted by the idea of a higher dosage of superficial validation. To a vague extent its hard to blame them, you and I both love validation too (though I believe we are probably far more deprived). The validation they get from bearing children and raising them brings much more joy then being validated by worthless men. Women, regardless of what they do, will get some level of validation by doing nothing more than being present and alive, so the ideal route for them is housewife who gets validation from men in a civil way.
The generational family not the nuclear family is the real traditional family.
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21620 and SLA
"Oppressed" isn't the right word - its what they consider oppression - we know what you mean though. Women being in charge of the domestic life, raising children and caring for a family is not oppression at all, but loving.
Women will choose promiscuity without direct repercussions over the responsibility of a family. Every time.

They must be 'oppressed' at least to the point where they have no option but to fill the motherly role.

It's the only way out of this clusterfuck dating market imo.
 
  • +1
Reactions: SLA

Similar threads

MoggerGaston
Replies
39
Views
1K
The Grinch
The Grinch
swt
Replies
2
Views
72
The Grinch
The Grinch
RichmondBread
Replies
5
Views
140
kentick
kentick
_Tigrim_
Replies
34
Views
825
PrinceLuenLeoncur
PrinceLuenLeoncur
X
Replies
10
Views
164
Deleted member 81734
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top