Abortion is unethical and should not be allowed BY ANY circustances

A

areayes

Banned
Joined
Oct 26, 2025
Posts
3,346
Reputation
3,293
Exept if the women life is at risk/she has to pick who will live.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: adeeyeah, walee, try2beme and 15 others
(Change my mind)
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah, walee, ss07 and 2 others
Exept if the women life is at risk/she has to pick who will live.
bro, school ends in 2 days and my teacher wants me to leave in my homework that was due 3 months ago, do i do it:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah and areayes
It's a perfect early stage fix to overpopulation, before you have to start considering to kill the elderly, limit the amount of children people can have, etc.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: adeeyeah, IAMNOTANINCEL, Divineincel and 1 other person
Nigga rep farming :lul:
It took me 2 months of hard work to fix my previous fucked up post rep ratio from my iqlet days in 2024. Im not gonne let it slide
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah and areayes
It's a perfect early stage fix to overpopulation, before you have to start considering to kill the elderly, limit the amount of children people can have, etc.
hitler was literally trying to save us from overpopulation
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: adeeyeah, Mess and areayes
It's a perfect early stage fix to overpopulation, before you have to start considering to kill the elderly, limit the amount of children people can have, etc.
Absolutly wrong, any human no metter what stage of development has the right to have rights.

The fetus/embryo inside the women belly has human rights and has the same worthy as anyone

(Hes a human living being)
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: adeeyeah, samgrattlescouilles, IAMNOTANINCEL and 3 others
It's a perfect early stage fix to overpopulation, before you have to start considering to kill the elderly, limit the amount of children people can have, etc.
Theres not enough people being born to replace the older generations
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah, Bartarus and theprox
what if the baby is ltn? lets be real its life will be worthless
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: adeeyeah, ltnbrownacnecel, Zygotic and 8 others
hitler was literally trying to save us from overpopulation
Hitler was a low iq then.

Killing is unethical, no metter what circustanses
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah and theprox
Also killing and unethical, the living being inside the women womb has no fault of the rapist chrimes and should not lose his life for it.

the same baby caused by a rape is the same baby from a planned pregnancy.

both has the same worth of living
And rape victims
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah and JoeNutz
Also killing and unethical, the living being inside the women womb has no fault of the rapist chrimes and should not lose his life for it.

the same baby caused by a rape is the same baby from a planned pregnancy.

both has the same worth of living
The child will know no warmth, pointless to allow to live
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah, Divineincel and m0ss26
You already posted this :think::think::think::think::think::think:
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: adeeyeah, Bartarus, JoeNutz and 2 others
The child will know no warmth, pointless to allow to live
Consciense doesnt define worthy, or if it is alive.

If we use this ideology we could kill 1 month old babys since they dont show any sign of consciousness.


Or people in coma/anesthesia. They also wont know they are alive or dead.
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah
What difference does it make? This is like saying people conceived in rape are worthless and should of been aborted. They are human to
Exactly, the baby caused by a rape and the baby caused by a planned pregnancy has the same worth and has the same rights
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah
What difference does it make? This is like saying people conceived in rape are worthless and should of been aborted. They are human to
Theres a difference between a rape victim and a common whore wanting to abort a fetus
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah and m0ss26
Not our place to judge

Why do you even care?
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah, m0ss26 and xyukeeee
Consciense doesnt define worthy, or if it is alive.

If we use this ideology we could kill 1 month old babys since they dont show any sign of consciousness.


Or people in coma/anesthesia. They also wont know they are alive or dead.
Im talking about how the rape-baby wont be loved
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah
Theres a difference between a rape victim and a common whore wanting to abort a fetus
Life should be always prioritzed than morals.

THe baby has the same worthy as any baby,

Killing a baby wont fix the main cause, the guy that raped chould be the one charged.
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah
hitler was literally trying to save us from overpopulation
Yes, he was very good to his people... Albeit just healthy people.

Absolutly wrong, any human no metter what stage of development has the right to have rights.

The fetus/embryo inside the women belly has human rights and has the same worthy as anyone

(Hes a human living being)
Do you really think that every human life has equal worth? Quite optimistic thinking (which is great to see). But our world is highly imperfect.

You're okay to allow children to be born, even if the parents are drug addicts, and will ultimately lead them down the same path? You're okay with seeing Indians having 8+ children, whilst not being able to financially or logistically support them? Is this not cruel? Do you really believe that apparent, innate human worth outweighs quality of life?

Theres not enough people being born to replace the older generations
But there soon will be. We're witnessing it already in the east, particularly in India and China. Both countries have far too many people, and thus their total population suffers. China is based, though. They've implemented some restrictive measures on birth.

We are already seeing (in the west) the detrimental effect of a growing population. House prices, job competitiveness, more crime, etc. We're ruining the quality of life for the people by having too much people. We are far past the Goldilock's zone and should do everything short of genocide to reduce the growing population.
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah
Not our place to judge

Why do you even care?
Wym by no place to judge?

Any human has the right to judge if killing is ethical or not ethical :lul:

Theres plenty of human living innocent beings getting murdered every single day and we should not opinate because we have no place to judge?

If theres a unethical thing happening we do have place to judge as a society.
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah and caleb555
Theres a difference between a rape victim and a common whore wanting to abort a fetus
You either believe abortion is murder or not. How does rape make a difference the baby is still human and there are lots of normal functioning members of society born from rape, would you tell them it would be fine if they got aborted?
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah
You either believe abortion is murder or not. How does rape make a difference the baby is still human and there are lots of normal functioning members of society born from rape, would you tell them it would be fine if they got aborted?
I believe its murder, and I believe its fine to abort such babies if the victim wants to
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah
Yes, he was very good to his people... Albeit just healthy people.


Do you really think that every human life has equal worth? Quite optimistic thinking (which is great to see). But our world is highly imperfect.

You're okay to allow children to be born, even if the parents are drug addicts, and will ultimately lead them down the same path? You're okay with seeing Indians having 8+ children, whilst not being able to financially or logistically? Is this not cruel? Do you really believe that apparent, innate human worth outweighs quality of life?


But there soon will be. We're witnessing it already in the east, particularly in India and China. Both countries have far too many people, and thus their total population suffers. China is based, though. They've implemented some restrictive measures on birth.

We are already seeing (in the west) the detrimental effect of a growing population. House prices, job competitiveness, more crime, etc. We're ruining the quality of life for the people by having too much people. We are far past the Goldilock's zone and should do everything short of genocide to reduce the growing population.
Like i said, morals should not be prioritized over life,

Doesnt metter if the parents are drugs addicts because LIFE is ALWAYS over morals, + you cant judge someones future, if someones gonna live or not.

You have your own right to say if YOU gonna live or not, but you dont have this power to say if someones gonna live or not.
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah, Mess and caleb555
Yes, he was very good to his people... Albeit just healthy people.


Do you really think that every human life has equal worth? Quite optimistic thinking (which is great to see). But our world is highly imperfect.

You're okay to allow children to be born, even if the parents are drug addicts, and will ultimately lead them down the same path? You're okay with seeing Indians having 8+ children, whilst not being able to financially or logistically support them? Is this not cruel? Do you really believe that apparent, innate human worth outweighs quality of life?


But there soon will be. We're witnessing it already in the east, particularly in India and China. Both countries have far too many people, and thus their total population suffers. China is based, though. They've implemented some restrictive measures on birth.

We are already seeing (in the west) the detrimental effect of a growing population. House prices, job competitiveness, more crime, etc. We're ruining the quality of life for the people by having too much people. We are far past the Goldilock's zone and should do everything short of genocide to reduce the growing population.
All human beings has the same worthy,

development doesnt equal less worthy

If we use this logic children has less worth than a adult because hes less developed.

Same goes to fetus/embryos.
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah
Killing is unethical, no metter what circustanses
Even Jesus Christ says that this isn't true, lmao.

"But now, the one who has a purse must take it, and likewise a bag. And the one who has no sword must sell his cloak and buy one." Luke 22:36
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah and MouthBreathingElite
Even Jesus Christ says that this isn't true, lmao.

"But now, the one who has a purse must take it, and likewise a bag. And the one who has no sword must sell his cloak and buy one." Luke 22:36
Exception ≠ rule.

Low iq people usually use excepetions to justify rules.

You clearly got what i wanted to say by killing is not ethical,

Prove me how killing a innocent human being is ethical, I am sure that Jesus Chris is not for that :lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah
christian moralfagging. race mixed babies 🤮
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah
All human beings has the same worthy,
1765932037341


Let me ask you this. If you were able to forsee futures, and you seen that one foetus would become a school shooter, would you still be against it's abortion?

Or, if another foetus was to die at 2 years old, after a debilitating fight with some cancer, would you still be against it's abortion?
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah and MouthBreathingElite
So are all lives equal? Or only the ones you deem to be human?
Screenshot 2025 12 17 01 44 17 087 comandroidchrome edit
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: adeeyeah, try2beme and Mess
Exception ≠ rule.

Low iq people usually use excepetions to justify rules.

You clearly got what i wanted to say by killing is not ethical,
You quite literally said that killing is wrong under any circumstances. ANY circumstances.

Prove me how killing a innocent human being is ethical, I am sure that Jesus Chris is not for that :lul:
Innocent, yet may suffer great pain in this world. It is sometimes the better of two evils to kill it.

Also, I'm not particularly religious. I just used Jesus as an example, seeing as he's the ultimate pacifist.
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah, try2beme and MouthBreathingElite
View attachment 4431091

Let me ask you this. If you were able to forsee futures, and you seen that one foetus would become a school shooter, would you still be against it's abortion?

Or, if another foetus was to die at 2 years old, after a debilitating fight with some cancer, would you still be against it's abortion?
We cant see the future buddy :lul:

If your conclusion only works in a fantasy scenario, it doesnt apply to real life

That argument relies on an impossible premise :lul: We cant read minds or know the future with certainty

Moral rules cant be based on superpowers that don’t exist


Just by this argument we can notice a low iq person over here :forcedsmile::forcedsmile:
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah
You quite literally said that killing is wrong under any circumstances. ANY circumstances.


Innocent, yet may suffer great pain in this world. It is sometimes the better of two evils to kill it.

Also, I'm not particularly religious. I just used Jesus as an example, seeing as he's the ultimate pacifist.
Is it you Mess? The OG mess?
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah and Mess
Kill whores
Kill Jews
Kill niggers

Might as well kill the babies for all I care
 
  • Love it
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah, Mess and MouthBreathingElite
We cant see the future buddy :lul:

If your conclusion only works in a fantasy scenario, it doesnt apply to real life

That argument relies on an impossible premise :lul: We cant read minds or know the future with certainty
Are you retarded? The child will still suffer or cause suffering, you just have the predetermined event stored in your head. Even if you didn't know beforehand, aborting both foetuses would result in no school shooter and no child dying a painful death.

Just by this argument we can notice a low iq person over here :forcedsmile::forcedsmile:
Nice ad hominem, great to see that I'm winning this so-called debate.

Is it you Mess? The OG mess?
Yes, it's me bro. Who's this?
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah and MouthBreathingElite
You quite literally said that killing is wrong under any circumstances. ANY circumstances.


Innocent, yet may suffer great pain in this world. It is sometimes the better of two evils to kill it.

Also, I'm not particularly religious. I just used Jesus as an example, seeing as he's the ultimate pacifist.
So your argument is killing babys because a prediction?
:lul::lul::lul::lul:


[you clearly got what i said by any circustances, you have to be severely low iq to not literally get what im saying
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah
Are you retarded? The child will still suffer or cause suffering, you just have the predetermined event stored in your head. Even if you didn't know beforehand, aborting both foetuses would result in no school shooter and no child dying a painful death.


Nice ad hominem, great to see that I'm winning this so-called debate.


Yes, it's me bro. Who's this?
You cant use seeing futurr as a argument because thats impossible dumbass negro,

You cant fucking see the future :lul:

You cant use superpowers and claim it as a argument :lul:

"If you could see the future and you d know he is a school shooter"

Tf is this argument:lul:
 
  • +1
Reactions: adeeyeah

Similar threads

Funnyunenjoyer1
Replies
10
Views
190
saugat
saugat
6ft4schizocel
Replies
23
Views
107
Mezialix
Mezialix
BelowAverage
Replies
3
Views
86
1385
1385
AutistSubhumanRtrd
Replies
10
Views
91
Diᴏgenes
Diᴏgenes
nicht vorbei?
Replies
27
Views
272
nicht vorbei?
nicht vorbei?

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top